Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnosis and categorization of small bowel neoplasms: Role of computed tomography

  • Published:
Gastrointestinal Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A retrospective study of 35 patients with small bowel neoplams studied by computed tomography (CT) was performed. The tumor detection rate was 80%. Using the findings reported in the literature, an adequate histological diagnosis could be performed in 69% of the cases by CT. Lipomas, leiomyomas, leiomyosarcomas, and carcinoid tumors were well-recognized, but adenocarcinomas and lymphomas were often mistaken one for the other. An accurate preoperative staging was performed in 61% of the cases. CT failed to detect 75% of the invaded lymph nodes, 25% of the liver metastases, and 25% of the tumoral growth beyond the bowel wall. Despite major limitations in preoperative staging, a good detection rate and some features allowing a specific diagnosis advocate using CT along with the barium examination when clinical history suggests a small bowel tumor.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adolph JM, Bernhard NK, Georgi P, Winkel K. Carcinoid tumors: CT and I-131 meta-iodo-benzylguanidine scintigraphy.Radiology 1987; 164:199–203

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. McLeod AJ, Zornoza J, Shirkhoda A. Leiomyosarcoma: computed tomographic findings.Radiology 1984; 152:133–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. McCarthy S, Stark DD, Moss AA, Goldberg HT. Computed tomography of abdominal carcinoid tumors.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1984; 8:846–850

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Hulnick DH, Naidich DP, Bosniak MA. CT evaluation of gastrointestinal leiomyomas and leiomyosarcomas.AJR 1985; 144:727–731

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Megibow AJ, Balthazar EJ, Naidich DP, Bosniak MA. Computed tomography of gastrointestinal lymphoma.AJR 1983; 141:541–547

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Picus D, Glazer HS, Eevitt RG, Husband JE. Computed tomography of abdominal carcinoid tumors.AJR 1984; 143:581–584

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Scigel RS, Kuhns LR, Borlaza GS, McCormick TL, Simmons JL. Computed tomography and angiography in ileal carcinoid tumor and rectractile mesenteritis.Radiology 1980; 134:437–440

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ormson MJ, Stephens DH, Carlson HC. CT recognition of intestinal lipomatosis.AJR 1985; 144:313–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nijssens M, Usewils R, Broeckx J, Ponette E, Baert AL. Eipoma of the duodenal bulb CT demonstration.Eur J Radiol 1983; 3:39–41

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dudiak KM, Johnson CD, Stephens DH. Primary tumors of the small intestine: CT evaluation.AJR 1989; 152:995–998

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Farah MC, Hasan Jafri SZ, Schwab RE, et al. Duodenal neoplasms: role of CT.Radiology 1987; 162:839–843

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Scatarige JC, Allen HA, Fishman EK. Computed tomography of the small bowel.Semin Ultrasound CT MR 1987; 8:403–423

    Google Scholar 

  13. James S, Balfe DM, Eee JK, Picus D. Small bowel disease: categorization by CT examination.AJR 1987; 148:863–868

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Pagani JJ, Bernardino ME. CT radiographic correlation of ulcerating small bowel lymphomas.AJR 1981; 136:998–1000

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cockey BM, Fishman EK, Jones B, Siegelman SS. Computed tomography of abdominal carcinoid tumor.J Comput Assist Tomogr 1985; 9:38–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Laurent, F., Raynaud, M., Biset, J.M. et al. Diagnosis and categorization of small bowel neoplasms: Role of computed tomography. Gastrointest Radiol 16, 115–119 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887323

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01887323

Key words

Navigation