Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults

  • Articles
  • Published:
Law and Human Behavior

Abstract

The Criteria-Based Content Analysis (CBCA) technique has been proposed as a way to differentiate truth from falsehood in interviews of children. We studied adults, utilizing 14 of the 19 CBCA criteria. In a 2×2 design, 114 students estimated the truthfulness of the statements of 12 adults; 6 were true and 6 described an invented traumatic personal experience. Subjects viewed a videotape or read a written transcript; half were trained in CBCA and half were not. Trained subjects who saw videotapes performed significantly better than chance and were significantly more accurate than each of the other 3 groups. For the trained subjects, 10 of the 14 CBCA criteria yielded significant differences in the predicted direction between evaluations of truthful and invented statements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bulkley, J. A. (1989). The impact of new child witness research on sexual abuse prosecutions. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 208–229). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceci, S. J., Ross, D. F., & Toglia, M. P. (1987). Age differences in suggestibility: Narrowing the uncertainties. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross, Eds.,Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 79–91). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Conerly, S. (1986). Assessment of suspected child sexual abuse. In K. MacFarlane, J. Waterman, S. Conerly, L. Damon, M. Durfee, & S. Long (Eds.),Sexual abuse of young children: Evaluation and treatment (pp. 30–51). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., & Pfeifer, R. L. (1986). On-the-job experience and skill in detecting deception.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 249–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • DePaulo, B. M., Stone, J. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1985). Deceiving and detecting deceit. In B. R. Schlenker (Ed.),The self and social life (pp. 323–370). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P., & O'Sullivan, M. (1991). Who can catch a liar?American Psychologist, 46, 913–920.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Esplin, P. W., Houed, T., & Raskin, D. C. (1988, June).Applications of statement validity assessment. Paper presented at the NATO-Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.

  • Faller, K. C. (1984). Is the child victim of sexual abuse telling the truth?Child Abuse and Neglect, 8, 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, G. S., & Clarke-Stewart, A. (1991). Suggestibility in children's testimony: Implications for sexual abuse investigations. In J. Doris (Ed.),The suggestivity of children's recollections (pp. 92–105). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. P. M., & McGraw, J. M. (1987). Reliable and fictitious accounts of sexual abuse in children.Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 2, 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. A., & Yuille, J. C. (1987). Suggestibility and the child witness. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 24–35). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehnken, G. (1987). Training police officers to detec deception: Does it work?Social Behaviour, 2, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehnken, G. (1989).The evaluation of statement credibility: Social judgement and expert diagnostic approaches. Paper presented at the International Conference on Children's Eyewitness Evidence in Legal Proceedings, Selwyn College, Cambridge, England.

  • Kraut, R. E., & Poe, D. (1980). On the line: The deception judgements of customs inspectors and laymen.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 784–798.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langer, E. J., & Abelson, R. P. (1972). The semantics of asking a favor: How to succeed in getting help without really dying.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 26–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, D. C., & Esplin, P. W. (1991). Assessment of children's statements of sexual abuse. In J. Doris (Ed.),The suggestibility of children's recollections (pp. 153–164). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin, D. C., & Yuille, J. C. (1989). Problems in evaluating interviews of children in sexual abuse cases. In S. J. Ceci, D. F. Ross, & M. P. Toglia (Eds.),Perspectives on children's testimony (pp. 184–207). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M. (1989). Recent developments in statement analysis. In J. C. Yuille (Ed.),Credibility sessment (pp. 135–154). Norwell, MA: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M., & Koehnken, G. (1989). Criteria-based statement analysis. In D. C. Raskin (Ed.),Psychological methods in clinical investigation and evidence (pp. 217–245). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steller, M., Raskin, D. C., Esplin, P. W., & Boychuk, T. (1989).Child sexual abuse: Forensic interviews and assessment techniques. Unpublished manuscript.

  • Steller, M., Wellershaus, P., & Wolf, T. (1988).Empirical validation of criteria-based content analysis. Paper presented at the NATO Advanced Study Institute on Credibility Assessment, Maratea, Italy.

  • Turtle, J. W., & Wells, G. L. (1987). Setting the stage for psychological research on the child eyewitness. In S. J. Ceci, M. P. Toglia, & D. F. Ross (Eds.),Children's eyewitness memory (pp. 230–248). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuille, J. C. (1988). The systematic assessment of children's testimony.Canadian Psychology, 29, 247–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. L., & Loftus, E. F. (1991). Commentary: Is this child fabricating? Reactions to a new assessment technique. In J. Doris (Ed.),The suggestivity of children's recollections (pp. 168–171). Washington, DC: APA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., DePaulo, B. M., & Rosenthal, R. (1981). Verbal and nonverbal communication of deception. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 14, pp. 1–59). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Kristine Landry is now at Clark University.

About this article

Cite this article

Landry, K.L., Brigham, J.C. The effect of training in Criteria-Based Content Analysis on the ability to detect deception in adults. Law Hum Behav 16, 663–676 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01884022

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01884022

Keywords

Navigation