Skip to main content
Log in

Bell's theorem and Bayes' theorem

  • Part III. Invited Papers Dedicated To John Stewart Bell
  • Published:
Foundations of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bell's theorem is expounded as an analysis in Bayesian probabilistic inference. Assume that the result of a spin measurement on a spin-1/2 particle is governed by a variable internal to the particle (local, “hidden”), and examine pairs of particles having zero combined angular momentum so that their internal variables are correlated: knowing something about the internal variable of one tells us something about that of the other. By measuring the spin of one particle, we infer something about its internal variable; through the correlation, about the internal variable of the second particle, which may be arbitrarily distant and is by hypothesis unchanged by this measurement (locality); and make (probabilistic) prediction of spin observations on the second particle. Each link in this chain has a counterpart in the Bayesian analysis of the situation. Irrespective of the details of the internal variable description, such prediction is violated by measurements on many particle pairs, so that locality—effectively the only physics invoked—fails. The time ordering of the two measurements is not Lorentz-invariant, implying acausality. Quantum mechanics is irrelevant to this reasoning, although its correct predictions of the statistics of the results imply it has a nonlocal—acausal interpretation; one such, the “transactional” interpretation, is presented to demonstrable advantage, and some misconceptions about quantum theory are pursued. The “unobservability” loophole in photonic Bell experiments is proven to be closed. It is shown that this mechanism cannot be used for signalling; signalling would become possible only if the hidden variables, which we insist must underlie the statistical character of the observations (the alternative is to give up), are uncovered in deviations from quantum predictions. Their reticence is understood as a consequence of their nonlocality: it is not easy to isolate and measure something nonlocal. Once the hidden variables are found, all the problems of quantum field theory and of quantum gravity might melt away.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. S. Bell,Physics 1, 195–200 (1964). Reprinted as Chapter 2 of J. S. Bell,Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, and N. Rosen,Phys. Rev. 47, 777–780 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  3. D. Bohm,Quantum Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1951), Section 22.16.

    Google Scholar 

  4. E. T. Jaynes, inFoundations of Probability Theory, Statistical Inference, and Statistical Theories of Science, W. L. Harper and C. A. Hooker, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976), pp. 175–257. Largely reprinted as Chapter 9 of Ref. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. E. T. Jaynes,Papers on Probability, Statistics and Statistical Physics, R. D. Rosenkrantz, ed. (Synthese Library158) (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  6. A. J. M. Garrett, “Macroirreversibility and microreversibility reconciled: The second law,” to be published inMaximum Entropy in Action, B. Buck and V. A. Macaulay, eds. (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

  7. R. T. Cox,Am. J. Phys. 14, 1–13 (1946).

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Tribus,Rational Descriptions, Decisions and Designs (Pergamon, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. E. T. Jaynes, inMaximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods in Inverse Problems, C. R. Smith and W. T. Grandy, Jr., eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1985), pp. 21–58.

    Google Scholar 

  10. A. Garg and N. D. Mermin,Found. Phys. 14, 1–39 (1984).

    Google Scholar 

  11. A. J. M. Garrett, inMaximum Entropy and Bayesian Methods, J. Skilling, ed. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  12. A. J. M. Garrett,Found. Phys. 20, 381–402 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  13. J. F. Clauser and A. Shimony,Rep. Prog. Phys. 41, 1881–1927 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Aspect, J. Dalibard, and G. Roger,Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 1804–1807 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  15. S. L. Braunstein and C. M. Caves,Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 662–665 (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  16. A. Fine,Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 291–295 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  17. N. D. Mermin,Phys. Today 38(4), 38–47 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  18. N. D. Mermin, inNew Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory, D. M. Greenberger, ed.,Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 480, 422–427 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  19. D. M. Greenberger, M. A. Horne, and A. Zeilinger, inBell's Theorem, Quantum Theory, and Conceptions of the Universe, M. Kafatos, ed. (Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1989), pp. 69–72.

    Google Scholar 

  20. N. D. Mermin,Am. J. Phys. 58, 731–734 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  21. P. M. Pearle,Phys. Rev. D 2, 1418–1425 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Lamehi-Rachti and W. Mittig,Phys. Rev. D 14, 2543–2555 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  23. D. Hestenes,Am. J. Phys. 47, 399–415 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  24. D. Hestenes, inClifford Algebras and Their Applications in Mathematical Physics, J. S. R. Chisholm and A. K. Common, eds. (Reidel, Dordrecht, 1986), pp. 321–346.

    Google Scholar 

  25. F. Herbut and M. Vujicic,J. Phys. A 20, 5555–5563 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. J. Bussey,Phys. Lett. A 90, 9–12 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. T. Jaynes, inBayesian Analysis and Decision Techniques: Essays in Honour of Bruno de Finetti (Studies in Bayesian Econometrics 6), P. K. Goel and A. Zellner, eds. (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1986), pp. 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  28. E. T. Jaynes,IEEE Trans. Syst. Sci. Cybern. SSC-4, 227–241 (1968); reprinted as Chapter 7 in Ref. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  29. J. von Neumann,Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, 1955), pp. 305–324. (English translation of German original, 1932.)

    Google Scholar 

  30. D. Bohm,Phys. Rev. 85, 166–179 and 180–193 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  31. J. S. Bell,Rev. Mod. Phys. 38, 447–452 (1966). Reprinted as Chapter 1 of Ref. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  32. J. S. Bell,Found. Phys. 12, 989–999 (1982). Reprinted as Chapter 17 of Ref. 1.

    Google Scholar 

  33. F. J. Belinfante,A Survey of Hidden-Variables Theories (Pergamon, Oxford, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  34. D. Hestenes,Found. Phys. 15, 63–87 (1985).

    Google Scholar 

  35. D. Hestenes, The Zitterbewegung interpretation of quantum mechanics,Found. Phys. 20, 1213–1232 (1990).

    Google Scholar 

  36. J. G. Cramer,Rev. Mod. Phys. 58, 647–687 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  37. K. V. Roberts,Proc. R. Soc. London A 360, 135–160 (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  38. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 17, 157–181 (1945).

    Google Scholar 

  39. J. A. Wheeler and R. P. Feynman,Rev. Mod. Phys. 21, 425–433 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Garrett, A.J.M. Bell's theorem and Bayes' theorem. Found Phys 20, 1475–1512 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883519

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883519

Keywords

Navigation