Abstract
The “theorems” showing the impossibility of ascribing to individual quantum systems a definite value of a set of observables, not necessarily commuting,1–4 are based on the tacit assumption that eachindividual spin component has a discrete dichotomic value. We show explicitly that it is possible to introduce continuous hidden variables for individual spins which avoid these quantum paradoxes without changing any of the observed quantum mechanical results.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
S. Kochen and E. P. Specker,J. Math. Mech. 17, 59 (1967).
A. Peres,Phys. Lett. A,151, 107 (1990).
D. M. Greenberg, M. Horne, A. Zeilinger, and A. Shimony,Am. J. Phys. 58, 1138 (1990).
D. Mermin,Phys. Rev. Lett. 65, 3373 (1990);Phys. Today 43, 9 (1990);Am. J. Phys. 58, 731 (1990).
A. O. Barut, “Quantum theory of single events,” inFoundations of Modern Physics, 1990, P. Lahti and P. Mittelstaed, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991), p. 31.
A. O. Barut and P. Meystre,Phys. Lett. 105A, 458 (1984).
A. O. Barut and M. Bozic,Nuovo Cimento 101B, 595 (198).
M. O. Scully, W. E. Lamb, and A. O. Barut,Found. Phys. 17, 575 (1987).
A. O. Barut, inQuantum Mechanics Versus Local Realism, F. Selleri, ed. (Plenum, New York, 1988), p. 433.
A. Aspect, inFrontiers of Nonequilibrium Statistical Physics, G. Moore and M. O. Scully, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1986), p. 185; A. O. Barut,ibid., p. 119.
H. P. Seipp,Found. Phys. 16, 1143 (1986).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Barut, A.O. How to avoid “quantum paradoxes”. Found Phys 22, 137–142 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883383
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01883383