Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Editorial comment

  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiac Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chirillo F, Marchiori MC, Andriolog L, Razzolini R, Mazzucco A, Galucci V, Chioin R. Outcome of 290 patients with aortic dissection: A 12-year multicentre experience. Eur Heart J 11: 311–9, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Erbel R, Oelert II, Meyer J, Puth M, Mohr-Kahaly S, Hausmann D, Daniel W, Maffei S, Caruso A, Baroni M, Terrazzi M, Fraser A, Taams M, Slavich G, Sutherland G, Roelandt J, Marcaggi X, for the European Cooperative Study Group on Echocardiography. Circulation 87: 1604–15, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lytle BW, Mahfood SS, Boosgrove DM, Loop FD. Replacement of the ascending aorta. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 99: 651–8, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Svenson IG, Crawford ES, Hess KR, Coselli JS, Safi HJ: Dissection of the aorta and dissecting aortic aneurysms. Circulation 82: IV-24–IV-38, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haverich A, Miller DC, Scott WC, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Shumway NE. Determinants of late survival and reoperation after aortic dissection repair. Circulation 72 (Suppl II): II-22–II-34, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Glower DD, Speier RIL, White WD, Smith LR, Rankin JS, Wolfe WG: Management and long-term outcome of aortic dissection. Ann Surg 214: 31–41, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kouchoukos NT, Wareing TH, Murphy SF, Perrillo JB. Sixteen-year experience with aortic root replacement. Ann Surg 214: 308–20, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Maffei S, Baroni M, Terrazzi M, Piacenti M, Paoli F, Camerini F, Verunelli F, Salvatore I, Biagini A. Ambulatory follow-up of aortic dissection: Comparison between computed tomography and biplane transesophageal echocardiography. Int Card Imag 12: 105–111, 1996.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Neufang KFR, Theissen P, Deider S, Sechtem U. Thorakale Aortendissektion — Stellenwert von MRT and CT in der Verlaufskontrolle nach prothetischem Aortenersatz. Fortschr Röntgenstr 151: 659–65, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Just M, Mohr-Kahaly S, Kreitner KF, Grebe P, Erbel R, Meyer J, Thelen M. Magnetresonanztomographie bei chronischer Aortendissektion. Fortschr Röntgenstr 158, 2: 109–114, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Universitätsklinikum Essen, Germany

    R. Erbel

Authors
  1. R. Erbel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erbel, R. Editorial comment. Int J Cardiac Imag 12, 137–138 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880745

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01880745

Keywords

Search

Navigation