Skip to main content
Log in

A Bayesian approach for incorporating uncertainty and data worth in environmental projects

  • Modeling
  • Published:
Environmental Modeling & Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A data worth model is presented for the analysis of alternative sampling schemes in a special project where decisions have to be made under uncertainty. This model is part of a comprehensive risk analysis algorthm with the acronym BUDA. The statistical framework in BUDA is Bayesian in nature and incorporates both parameter uncertainty and natural variability. In BUDA a project iterates among the analyst, the decision maker, and the field work. As part of the analysis, a data worth model calculates the value of a data campaign before the actual field work, thereby allowing the identification of an optimum data collection scheme. A goal function which depicts the objectives of a project is used to discriminate among different alternatives. A Latin hypercube sampling scheme is used to propagate parameter uncertainties to the goal function. In our example the uncertain parameters are the parameters which describe the geostatistical properties of saturated hydraulic conductivity in a Molasse environment. Our results indicated that failing to account for parameter uncertainty produces unrealistically optimistic results, while ignoring the spatial structure can lead to an inefficient use of the existing data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. R.A. Freeze, J. Massmann, L. Smith, T. Sperling and B. James, Ground Water 28 (1990) 738.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D.R. Davis and W.M. Dvoranchik, Water Resour. Res. 7 (1971) 700.

    Google Scholar 

  3. G.J. Vicens, I. Rodriguez-Iturbe and J.C. Schaake Jr., Water Resour. Res. 11 (1975) 405.

    Google Scholar 

  4. H.H. Einstein and G.B. Baecher, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering 16 (1983) 39.

    Google Scholar 

  5. J.S. Gates and C.C. Kisiel, Water Resour. Res. 10 (1974) 1031.

    Google Scholar 

  6. E.G. Reichard and J.S. Evans, Water Resour. Res. 25 (1989) 1451.

    Google Scholar 

  7. P.W. Grosser and A.S. Goodman, Civ. Eng. Syst. 2 (1985) 186.

    Google Scholar 

  8. M. Ben-Zvi, B. Berkowitz and S. Kesler, Water Resour. Manage. 2 (1988) 11.

    Google Scholar 

  9. C.M. Marin, M.A. Medina, Jr. and B. Butcher, J. Contam. Hydrol. 5 (1989) 1.

    Google Scholar 

  10. M.A. Medina, Jr., B. Butcher and M.M. Carlos, J. Contam. Hydrol. 5 (1989) 15.

    Google Scholar 

  11. B.R. James and R.A. Freeze, Water Resour. Res. 29 (1993) 2049.

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.R. James and S.M. Gorelick, Water Resour. Res. 30 (1994) 3499.

    Google Scholar 

  13. K.C. Abbaspour, Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 71 (1994) 297.

    Google Scholar 

  14. H. Raiffa and R. Schlaifer,Applied Statistical Decision Theory, The M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, MA, 1961.

    Google Scholar 

  15. K.C. Abbaspour, R. Schulin and E. Schläppi, submitted for review to Mathematical Geology (1996).

  16. K.C. Abbaspour, M.Th. van Genuchten, R. Schulin and E. Schläppi, submitted for review to Water Resources Research (1996).

  17. C. Martinson, Eclogae Geologicae Helvetiae 87 (1994) 473.

    Google Scholar 

  18. J.R. Benjamin and C.A. Cornell,Probability, Statistics, and Decision for Civil Engineers, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

  19. M.H. DeGroot,Probability and Statistics, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  20. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman and W.J. Conover, Technometrics 21 (1979) 239.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Abbaspour, K.C., Schulin, R., Schläppi, E. et al. A Bayesian approach for incorporating uncertainty and data worth in environmental projects. Environ Model Assess 1, 151–158 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874902

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874902

Keywords

Navigation