Skip to main content
Log in

Shadow price principles applied to regulated pricing of natural gas

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Inclusion of the shadow prices for natural gas in a dynamic fuels model for the United States shows that the primary reason for the relatively large, fly-up in new marginal gas prices in the early 1980's was the release of the pent-up price effects of the U.S. government's price regulations. In accordance with principles, the shadow price of natural gas fell siginificantly following de-regulation of the highcost gas (section 107) in 1980, which represented the precursor for downward adjustments in marginal wellhead prices of new high-cost gas and drilling activity. The modeling results show that no significant fly-up in new marginal gas prices for lower-cost gas (section 102) is likely to occur in 1985, when its phased de-regulation ends and it is finally de-regulated, because no shadow price precursor currently exists for this gas. Shadow price principles clear up the primary misconceptions with regard to natural gas pricing. This application indicates the significance of shadow price principles for regulated pricing in general.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Energy Resource Analysis Model, A.G.A.-TERA 83-1 (American Gas Association, Arlington, Va., Feb. 8, 1983).

  2. G.B. Dantzig and A. Orden,Duality Theorems, RAND Report RM-1265 (The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica, Ca., Oct. 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. Dorfman, P.A. Samuelson and R.T. Solow,Linear Programming and Economic Analysis (McGraw-Hill, New York 1958).

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.A. Dreyfus, Technology planning decisions, Paper presented at Assoc. for Adv. of Sci. Annual Meeting, Normative Analysis Symposium., Detroit, Michigan, May 28, 1983, this volume.

  5. R.J. Duffin, E.L. Peterson and C. Zener,Geometric Programming Theory and Application (Wiley, New York, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. H.J. Frank, ed., Special issue on natural gas de-regulation, The Energy J. 3, No. 4 (1982).

  7. M.D. Intriligator,Mathematical Optimization and Economic Theory (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.A. Johnson and R.E. Messick, Vertical divestiture of U.S. oil firms: The impact on the world oil market,Law and Policy in International Business, Vol. 8, No. 4 (1976) p. 963.

    Google Scholar 

  9. E.F. Mitchell, ed.,The De-Regulation of Natural Gas (Amer. Enterprise Institute for Public Policy Research, Washington, D.C., 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  10. M. Ott and I.A. Tatom, Are there adverse effects associated with natural gas decontrol?, Contemporary Policy Issues 1(1982)27.

    Google Scholar 

  11. R.S. Pindyck,The Structure of World Energy Demand, M.I.T. Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.G. Thompson, J.C. Stone, S. Muthukrishan and S. Raghaven Input-output modeling from the bottom-up rather than from the top-down,Large Scale Engery Models, AAAS Selected Symposium 73, ed. R.M. Thrall et al. (Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1983) p. 101.

    Google Scholar 

  13. A.R. Tussing and C.C. Barlow, The decline and fall of regulation, The Energy J. 3, No. 4 (1982) 103.

    Google Scholar 

  14. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration,Annual Energy Outlook 1982 — Supplement (Washington, D.C.).

  15. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration,Shor-Term Energy Outlook, DOE/EIA-0202(82/4Q)-2., Vol. 2, Methodology (Washington, D.C., 1982).

  16. J.W. Wilkinson, The supply demand and average price of natural gas under free market conditions, The Energy J. 4, No. 1 (1983) p. 99.

    Google Scholar 

  17. T.J. Woods and E.H. Vidas,The GRI Hydrocarbon Model (Gas Research Institute, Chicago, Ill., 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. T.C. Koopmans, Concepts of optimality and their uses, Nobel Memorial Lecture (Dec., 1975) Mathematical Programming 11(1976)212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L.V. Kantarovich, Mathematics in economics: Achievements, difficulties, perspectives, Nobel Memorial Lecture (Dec. 1975) Mathematical Programming 11(1976)204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. A., Charnes and W.W. Cooper,Management Models and Industrial, Applications of Linear Programming, Vols. I and II, (Wiley, New York, 1961).

    Google Scholar 

  21. U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration,The Current State of the Natural Gas Market, DOE/EIA-0313, (Dec. 1981).

  22. G.B. Dantzig,Linear Programming and Extensions (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  23. R.G. Thompson and F.D. Singleton, Jr., Natural gas demands depend on environmental policy, Review of Regional Economics and Business, (April, 1983).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thompson, R.G., Singleton, F.D. Shadow price principles applied to regulated pricing of natural gas. Ann Oper Res 2, 285–316 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874745

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01874745

Keywords and phrases

Navigation