Skip to main content
Log in

Managing vegetation within U.S. national parks: A policy analysis

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of U.S. national park vegetation management policies is briefly traced from 1872, when Yellowstone National Park was created, to the present. Ambiguities in legislative policies are described and partially resolved. Alternative vegetation management objectives, consistent with those policies, are evaluated using quantitative data from a giant sequoia-mixed-conifer forest community in Kings Canyon National Park. It is concluded from an analysis of this data that structural maintenance objectives are biologically infeasible in this forest community because the community does not have a fully regulated or steady-state distribution of aggregation types. Since such a steady-state distribution of aggregation types is probably not present in most forest communities, the Park Service is generally restricted to pursuing process maintenance objectives for vegetation within national parks and monuments. It is also pointed out that implementation of some process maintenance objectives is complicated by the need to return the forest community to its pre-fire exclusion state before reintroducing fire to the ecosystem. To do otherwise would perpetuate the changes in species composition and structure that have resulted from more than three-quarters of a century of fire exclusion. A new alternative for managing vegetation in national parks that is based on a high resolution description of the presettlement forest community, called the reconstruction-simulation approach, is also presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Agee, J. K. 1977. Fire management in the national parks.Western Wildlands 4: 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnicksen, T. M., and E. C. Stone. 1978. An analysis of vegetation management to restore the structure and function of presettlement giant sequoia-mixed conifer forest mosaics. Report to the U.S. National Park Service Western Regional Office. 159 pp.

  • Bonnicksen, T. M., and E. C. Stone. 1981. The giant sequoiamixed conifer forest community characterized through pattern analysis as a mosaic of aggregations.Forest Ecology and Management 3 (4): 307–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnicksen, T. M., and E. C. Stone. 1982. The reconstruction of a presettlement giant sequoia-mixed conifer forest community using the aggregation approach.Ecology (In press). 30 pp.

  • Botkin, D. B., J. F. Janak, and J. R. Wallis. 1972. Rationale, limitations, and assumptions of a northeastern forest growth simulator.IBM Journal of Research Development 16 (2): 101–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clar, R. C. 1969. California government and forestry—II. California Division of Forestry, Sacramento. 319 pp.

  • Dolan, R., and B. Hayden. 1974. Adjusting to nature in our national seashores.National Parks and Conservation Magazine 48:9–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D., and L. H. Reineke. 1933. Preliminary yield tables for second-growth stands in the California pine region. USDA Technical Bulletin No. 354. Washington, DC. 24 pp.

  • Everhart, W. C. 1972. The National Park Service. Praeger Publishers, New York, NY. 276 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ise, J. 1961. Our national park policy: A critical history. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, MD. 701 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilgore, B. M., and D. Taylor. 1979. Fire history of a sequoiamixed conifer forest.Ecology 60: 129–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, A. S., S. A. Cain, C. M. Cottom, J. N. Gabrielson, and T. L. Kimball. 1963. Wildlife management in the national parks.American Forests 69: 32–35, 61–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundgren, A. L., and W. A. Dolid, 1970. Biological growth functions describe published site index curves for Lake States timber species. USDA Forest Service North Central Forest and Range Experiment Station. 9 pp.

  • National Academy of Sciences. 1963. A report by the Advisory Committee to the National Park Service on Research. National Academy of Sciences—National Research Council. Washington, DC. 156 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. C. 1965. Preserving vegetation in parks and wilderness.Science 150: 1261–1267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner, L. 1967. Biological research and management in the National Park Service—a history. USNPS office of Natural Sciences. (Processed). 27 pp.

  • U.S. National Park Service. 1968. Compilation of the administrative policies for the national parks and national monuments of scientific significance (natural area category). Washington. DC. 66 pp.

  • U. S. National Park Service. 1978. Management policies. Washington, DC. 156 pp.

  • Wright, G. M., J. S. Dixon, and B. H. Thompson. 1933. A preliminary survey of faunal relations in national parks. USDI National Park Service Fauna Series No. 1. 157 pp.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bonnicksen, T.M., Stone, E.C. Managing vegetation within U.S. national parks: A policy analysis. Environmental Management 6, 109–122 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01871431

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01871431

Key words

Navigation