Summary
The activation of rabbit aortic smooth muscle was studied by two most widely used vascular smooth muscle stimulants: α-adrenoceptor activation by norepinephrine (NE) and high-K+ depolarization. This was studied by measurements of isometric contractions and net as well as unidirectional Ca2+ fluxes. These parameters showed markedly differential sensitivities towards two smooth muscle inhibitors used in this study: D 600 and amrinone. By choosing an appropriate concentration of D 600 or amrinone, Ca2+ uptake or Ca2+ influx induced by high K+ or NE could be selectively inhibited. Furthermore, by using unidirectional flux measurements it was demonstrated that Ca2+ influx stimulated by NE and high K+ were additive in nature. The data from the addivity experiment exclude the interpretation of a common Ca2+ pathway with two separate mechanisms for opening it. The data on three criteria employed in this study provide evidence for the existence of two independent Ca2+ pathways, one for each mode of activation, for Ca2+ influx known to be associated with these contractions.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bolton, T.B. 1979. Mechanism of action of transmitters and other substances on smooth muscle.Physiol. Rev. 59:606
Bose, D., Innes, I.R. 1975. Utilization of calcium pools during pharmaco- or electromechanical coupling in smooth muscle.Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 53:586
Breemen, C. van 1969. Blockade of membrane calcium fluxes by lanthanum in relation to vascular smooth muscle contractility.Arch. Int. Physiol. Biochim. 77:710
Breeman, C. van 1975. Transmembrane calcium transport in vascular smooth muscle.In: Vascular Neuroeffector Mechanisms, 2nd International Symposium (Odense). pp. 67–79. Krager, Basel 67-79
Breemen, C. van, Aaronson, P., Loutzenhiser, R. 1979. Na+, Ca2+ interactions in mammalian smooth muscle.Pharmacol. Rev. 30:167
Breemen, C. van, Siegel, B. 1980 The mechanism of α-adrenergic activation of the dog coronary artery.Circ. Res. 46:426
Deth, R., Breemen, C. van 1974. Relative contributions of Ca2+ influx and cellular Ca2+ release during drug induced activation of the rabbit aorta.Pfluegers Arch. 348:13
Deth, R., Breemen, C. van 1977. Agonist induced release of intracellular Ca2+ in the rabbit aorta.J. Membrane Biol. 30:363
Farah, A.F., Alousi, A.A. 1978. New cardiotonic agents: A search for digitalis substitute.Life Sci. 22:1139
Fleckenstein, A. 1977. Specific pharmacology of calcium in myocardium, cardiac pacemakers, and vascular smooth muscle.Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. 17:149
Hille, B. 1973. Potassium channels in myelinated nerve. Selective permeability to small cations.J. Gen. Physiol. 61:669
Hinke, J.A.M. 1965. Calcium requirements for noradrenaline and high potassium ion contraction in arterial smooth muscle.In: Muscle. W.M. Paul, E.E. Daniel, C.M. Kay, and G. Monckton, editors. p. 269. Pergamon Press, Oxford
Hudgins, P.M., Weiss, G.B. 1968. Differential effects of calcium removal upon vascular smooth muscle contraction induced by norepinephrine, histamine, and potassium.J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 159:91
Kalsner, S., Nickerson, M., Boyd, G. 1970. Selective blockade of potassium-induced contractions of aortic strips by β-diethylaminoethyldiphenylpropylacetate (SKF 525A).J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 174:500
Meisheri, K.D., Hwang, O., Breemen, C. van 1980b. Norepinephrine and high-K+ depolarization utilize separate Ca2+ channels during vascular smooth muscle activation.Fed. Proc. 39:711
Meisheri, K.D., Palmer, R.F., Breemen, C. van 1980a. The effects of amrinone on contractility, Ca2+ uptake, and cAMP in smooth muscle.Eur. J. Pharmacol. 61:159
Ritchie, J.M. 1975. Binding of tetrodotoxin and saxitoxin to sodium channels.Phil. Trans. R. Soc. London B 270:319
Waugh, W.H. 1962. Role of calcium in contractile excitation of vascular smooth muscle by epinephrine and potassium.Circ. Res. 11:927
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Meisheri, K.D., Hwang, O. & van Breemen, C. Evidence for two separate Ca2+ pathways in smooth muscle plasmalemma. J. Membrain Biol. 59, 19–25 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01870817
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01870817