Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of sugars on salt reception in true slime moldPhysarum polycephalum

Physicochemical interpretation of interaction between salt and sugar receptions

  • Published:
The Journal of Membrane Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Interaction between salt and sugar receptions in plasmodium ofPhysarum polycephalum was studied by using double-chamber method. Effect of sugars on salt reception was evaluated by measuring membrane potential and the motive force of tactic movement of the slime mold, where salt concentration in one compartment was increased successively with a fixed sugar concentration. Results are summarized as follows: (1) The presence ofd-glucose,d-mannose,d-maltose, or sucrose in medium led to increase of the threshold concentration,C th , for salts (chlorides and nitrates of Li, Na, K), whereasd-ribose decreased the threshold for salt reception.d-galactose showed no appreciable effect onC th of every salt species examined. No change inC th for salt reception was observed until concentration of sugars exceeded their respective thresholds. (2) Double logarithmic plots ofC th for salts against sugar concentration followed different straight lines for different cations, whose slopes being closely correlated with the effects of lyotropic number of anions in the absence of sugars. (3) Plots of logC th against the reciprocal of the absolute temperature, 1/T, gave linear relations, and the slopes of the straight line became small with increase of sugar concentration above their respective thresholds.

Experimental results obtained here suggest that the structure of water at the interface of cell membrane plays an indispensable role in the interaction between salt and sugar receptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beidler, L.M. 1954. A theory of taste stimulation.J. Gen. Physiol. 38:133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beidler, L.M., Fishman, I.Y., Hardiman, C.W. 1955. Species differences in taste responses.Am. J. Physiol. 181:235

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Camp, W.G. 1936. A method of cultivating myxomycete plasmodia.Bull. Torrey Bot. Club 63:205

    Google Scholar 

  4. Diamond, J.M., Wright, E.M. 1969. Biological membranes: The physical basis of ion and nonelectrolyte selectivity.Annu. Rev. Physiol. 31:581

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Franks, F., Ranvenhill, J.R., Reid, D.S. 1972. Thermodynamic studies of dilute aqueous solutions of cyclic ether and simple carbohydrates.J. Solu. Chem. 1:3

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kamiya, N. 1942. Physical aspects of protoplasmic streaming.In: “The Structure of Protoplasm. W. Seifriz, editor. pp. 199–244. Iowa State University Press, Ames

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kamiya, N. 1959. Protoplasmic streaming. Protoplasmatologia8 (3a):1

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tait, M.J., Suggett, A., Franks, F., Ablett, S., and Quickenden, P.A. 1972. Hydration of monosaccharides: A study by dielectric and nuclear magnetic relaxation.J. Solu. Chem. 1:131

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ueda, T., Kurihara, K., and Kobatake, Y. 1975. Response ofNitella internodal cell to chemical stimulation: A model for olfactory receptor system.J. Membrane Biol. 25:271

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ueda, T., Terayama, K., Kurihara, K., and Kobatake, Y. 1975. Threshold phenomena in chemoreception and taxis in slime moldPhysarum polycephalum.J. Gen. Physiol. 65:223

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Voet, A. 1939. Quantitative lyotropy.Chem. Rev. 20:169

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Terayama, K., Ueda, T., Kurihara, K. et al. Effect of sugars on salt reception in true slime moldPhysarum polycephalum . J. Membrain Biol. 34, 369–381 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01870309

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01870309

Keywords

Navigation