Skip to main content
Log in

Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Land classification systems can be useful for assessing aquatic ecosystems if relationships among them exist. Because the character of an aquatic ecosystem depends to a large extent upon the character of the landscape it drains, spatial patterns in aquatic ecosystems should correspond to patterns in the landscape. To test this hypothesis, the US state of Ohio was divided into four aquatic ecoregions based on an analysis of spatial patterns in the combination of land-surface form, land use, potential natural vegetation, and soil parent material. During the period July–October 1983, fish assemblages were sampled in 46 streams that were representative of the ecoregions, and that had watersheds relatively undisturbed by human activities. Spatial patterns of the fish assemblages were examined relative to the ecoregions; distinct regional differences were identified. The assemblages differed most between the Huron/Erie Lake Plain region and the Western Allegheny Plateau region; assemblages in the Eastern Corn Belt Plains and the Erie/Ontario Lake Plain-Interior Plateau regions were intermediate. This pattern also reflects the gradient in landscape character as one moves from the northwest to the southeast of Ohio.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Anderson, J. R. 1970. Major land-uses. Pages 157–160in A. C. Gerlach (ed.), The national atlas of the United States. US Geological Survey. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1976. Ecoregions of the United States: map (scale 1∶7,500,000). USDA Forest Service, Ogden, Utah.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1983. Delineation of ecosystem regions.Environmental Management 7:365–373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey, R. G. 1984. Testing an ecosystem regionalization.Journal of Environmental Management 19:239–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G. C. 1983. Fishes of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1052 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlander, K. D. 1969. Handbook of freshwater fishery biology, vol. 1. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 752 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlander, K. D. 1977. Handbook of freshwater fishery biology, vol. 2. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa, 431 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowley, J. M. 1967. Biogeography.Canadian Geographer 11:312–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch, K. D., J. R. Karr, and P. R. Yant. 1984. Regional application of an index of biotic integrity based on stream fish communities.Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 113:39–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Register. 1983. Water quality standards regulation. 48:51399–51413.

  • Fenneman, N. W. 1928. Physiographic divisions of the United States.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 18:261–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenneman, N. M. 1946. Physical divisions of the United States: map. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauch, H., Jr. 1982. Multivariate analysis in community ecology. Cambridge University Press, New York, 298 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond, E. H. 1964. Classes of land-surface form in the forty-eight states, U.S.A.Annals of the Association of American Geographers 54:map suppl. 4.

  • Hawkes, C. L., D. L. Miller, and W. G. Layher. 1986. Fish ecoregions of Kansas: stream fish assemblage patterns and associated environmental correlates.Environmental Biology of Fishes (in press).

  • Hill, M. O. 1979.Decorana: aFortran program for detrended correspondence analysis and reciprocal averaging. Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hynes, H. B. N. 1975. The stream and its valley.Verhandlungen Internationale Vereinigung für theoretische und angewandte Limnologie 19:1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarman, R. 1984. The development of aquatic ecoregions in Oklahoma. PhD thesis, University of Oklahoma, 196 pp.

  • Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish communities.Fisheries 6:21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R., and I. J. Schlosser. 1978. Water resources and the land-water interface.Science 201:229–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuchler, A. W. 1964. Potential natural vegetation. US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. S., C. R. Gilbert, C. H. Hocutt, R. E. Jenkins, D. E. McAllister, and J. R. Stauffer, Jr. 1980. Atlas of North American freshwater fishes. North Carolina State Museum of Natural History, Raleigh, 854 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legendre, L., and V. Legendre. 1984. Postglacial dispersal of freshwater fishes in the Quebec Peninsula.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 41:1781–1802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Likens, G. E., and F. H. Bormann. 1974. Linkages between aquatic and terrestrial ecosystems.Bioscience 21:447–456.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neter, J., and W. Wasserman. 1974. Applied linear statistical models. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, 842 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohio Department of Natural Resources. 1973. Know Ohio's soil regions. Columbus, Ohio.

  • Olson, R. J., K. D. Kumar, and R. L. Burgess. 1982. Analysis of ecoregions utilizing the geoecology data base. Pages 149–156in T. B. Brann, L. O. House IV, and H. G. Lund (eds.), In-place resource inventories: principles and practices—proceedings of a national workshop. Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W. L. 1971. A distributional study of Missouri fishes.Museum of Natural History University of Kansas Publications 20:225–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W. L. 1975. The fishes of Missouri. Missouri Department of Conservation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 343 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflieger, W. L., M. A. Schene, and P.S. Haverland. 1981. Techniques for the classification of stream habitats, with examples of their application in defining the stream habitats of Missouri. Pages 367–368in N. B. Armantrout (ed.), Acquisition and utilization of aquatic habitat inventory information: proceedings of a symposium. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platts, W. S. 1979. Including the fishery system in land planning. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report INT-60. Ogden, Utah, 37 pp.

  • Reckhow, K. H. 1980. Techniques for exploring and presenting data applied to lake phosphorous concentration.Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 37:290–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. S., and J. W. Sheard. 1981. Ecological land classification: a survey approach.Environmental Management 5:451–464.

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute, Inc. 1982. SAS user's guide: statistics. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina, 584 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirazi, M. A. 1984. Land classification used to select abandoned hazardous waste study sites.Environmental Management 8:281–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. W. 1979. The fishes of Illinois. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Illinois, 314 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, R. G. D., and J. H. Torrie. 1980. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York, 633 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautman, M. B. 1981. The fishes of Ohio. Ohio State University Press, Columbus, Ohio, 683 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Agriculture. 1981. Land and resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States. Agriculture handbook 296. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, C. E. 1979. Toward classification and rationale for watershed management and stream protection. EPA-600/3-79-059. US Environmental Protection Agency, Corvallis, Oregon, 143 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Larsen, D.P., Omernik, J.M., Hughes, R.M. et al. Correspondence between spatial patterns in fish assemblages in ohio streams and aquatic ecoregions. Environmental Management 10, 815–828 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867734

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867734

Key words

Navigation