Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity

  • Profile
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Though the restoration of disturbed ecosystems has so far played a relatively modest role in the effort to conserve biological diversity, there are reasons to suspect that its role will increase and that its contribution to the maintenance of diversity will ultimately prove crucial as techniques are further refined and as pristine areas for preservation become scarcer and more expensive.

It is now possible to restore a number of North American communities with some confidence. However, it should be noted that many current efforts to return degraded lands to productive use, like attempts to reclaim land disturbed by mining, try only for rehabilitation to a socially acceptable condition and fall considerably short of actually restoring a native ecological community.

Possible uses for restoration in the conservation of biodiversity include not only the creation of habitat on derelict sites, but also techniques for enlarging and redesigning existing reserves. Restoration may even make it possible to move reserves entirely in response to long-term events, such as changes in climate. Restoration in the form of reintroduction of single species to preexisting or restored habitat is also a critical link in programs to conserve species ex situ in the expectation of eventually returning them to the wild. And restoration provides opportunities to increase diversity through activities as diverse as management of utility corridors, transportation rights-of-way, and parks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Anonymous. 1983. Restoration key to assessing environmental damages liability: Interior seeks aid.Restoration and Management Notes 1(4): 14–15.

  • Applegate, R. D. 1985. Pine plantations: study suggests ecological value.Restoration and Management Notes 3(1):28–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashby, W. C., N. F. Rogers, and C. A. Kolar. 1980. Forest tree invasion and diversity on stripmines. Pages 273–281in H. E. Garrett and G. S. Cox (eds.), Proceedings of the central hardwoods conference III. University of Missouri, Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Belous, R. 1984. Restoration among the redwoods.Restoration and Management Notes 2(2):56–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, J. J. 1985. Restoring the earth. Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botkin, D. B. 1977. Strategies for the reintroduction of species into damaged ecosystems. Pages 241–260in J. Cairns, K. L. Dickson, and E. E. Herricks (eds.), Recovery and restoration of damaged ecosystems. University Press of Virginia, Charlottesville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D., and R. G. Hallman. 1984. Reclaiming disturbed lands. USDA Forest Service 1454.1, Technical Services-Range, 2200.8422 2805, Equipment Development Center, Missoula, MT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. E., J. B. Maddox, and W. E. Splittstoesser. 1983. The use of trees, shrubs and forbs for reclamation of mine spoils. Pages 129–139in P. E. Pope (ed.), Better reclamation with trees. Proceedings of the third annual conference, Purdue University, Lafayette, IN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, K. A., and R. J. Pleznac. 1981. A summary of prairie preservation and reconstruction in Michigan. Pages 151–155in R. L. Stuckey and K. J. Reese (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth North American prairie conference. Ohio Biological Survey, Notes No. 15. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, G. D., E. B. Welch, S. A. Peterson, and P. R. Newroth. 1986. Lake and reservoir restoration. Butterworths, Stoneham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cottam, G. 1979. Management: our first 45 years.Arboretum News 28(1):1–4, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree, A. F. 1984. Proceedings of the third international symposium on environmental concerns in rights-of-way management. Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cronk, Q. C. B. 1983. The decline of the redwoodThrochetripsis erythroxylon on St. Helena.Biological Conservation 26:163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossley, K. G. 1985. A survey of communication in the field of land restoration.Restoration and Management Notes 3:45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, J. T. 1959. The Vegetation of Wisconsin. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, J. M. 1975. The island dilemma: lessons of modern biogeography, studies for the design of nature reserves.Biological Conservation 7:129–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diekelmann, J., and R. Schuster. 1982. Natural landscaping: designing with native plant communities. McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Game, M. 1980. Best shape for nature reserves.Nature 287:630–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilpin, M. E., and J. Diamond. 1980. Subdivision of nature preserves and the maintenance of species diversity.Nature 285:567–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gore, J. A. 1985. The restoration of rivers and streams. Butterworths, Stoneham, MA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosselink, J. G., and R. H. Baumann. 1980. Wetland inventories: wetland loss along the United States coast.Z. Geomorphol. 34:173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, H. E., M. Sifuentes, and C. O. Martin. 1981. Reestablishment of native grasses by the Corps of Engineers on project lands in the Southwestern Division Area. Pages 194–201 in R. Stuckey and K. J. Reese (eds.), Proceedings of the sixth North American prairie conference, Ohio Biological Survey Notes, No. 15. Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanmer, R. W. 1983. EPA's emerging nonpoint source role. Pages 1–2in Lake and reservoir management. Proceedings of the third annual conference of the North American lake management society. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellmann, R. 1984. Forest restoration at Fancher Center.Restoration and Management Notes 2(1): 16–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgs, A. J., and M. B. Usher. 1980. Should nature reserves be large or small?Nature 285:568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holtz, S. L., and E. A. Howell. 1983. Restoration of grassland in a degraded woods using the management techniques of cutting and burning. Pages 124–129in R. Brewer (ed.), Proceedings of the eighth North American prairie conference. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, E. 1986. Woodland restoration: an overview.Restoration and Management Notes 4(1):13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Janzen, D. 1985. How to grow a tropical national park. Summary of presentation to symposium on tropical forest conservation. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, December 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. R., III. 1983. Hint of green.Restoration and Management Notes 1(4):4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, W. R., M. Gilpin, and J. Aber. 1987. Restoration ecology: a synthetic approach to ecological research. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karr, J. R. 1981. Assessment of biotic integrity using fish populations.Fisheries 6(6):21–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman, D. G., B. B. Beck, L. A. Dietz, and J. D. Ballou. 1985. Conservation program for the golden lion tamarin: captive research and management, ecological studies, educational strategies, and reintroduction. Pages 959–979in K. Benirschke (ed.), Primates: the road to self-sustaining populations. Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klopatek, J. M., R. J. Olson, L. J. Emerson, and J. L. Jones. 1979. Land-use conflicts with natural vegetation in the United States. ORNL/TM-6813, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, P. L., and W. W. Woodhouse, Jr. 1982. Pacific coastal marshes. Pages 111–130in R. R. Lewis (ed.), Creation and restoration of coastal plant communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar, C., and W. C. Ashby. 1978. Potential for woodland habitat from surface-mine tree plantings. Pages 323–330in Editors, Transactions of the 43rd North American wildlife and natural resources conference, Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Konstant, W. R., and R. A. Mittermeier. 1982. Introduction, reintroduction and translocation of neotropical primates: past experiences and future possibilities.International Zoo Yearbook 22:69–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, M. M. 1984. Invasion of volunteer tree species on stripmine plantations in east-central Ohio. Research Bulletin 1158, Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center, Wooster, OH.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. R., III. 1982. Lowmarshes, peninsular Florida. Pages 147–152in R. R. Lewis (ed.), Creation and restoration of coastal plant communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, L. 1962. Rivers.American Scientist 50:511–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddy, J. K. 1970. Midwest livestock producers rediscover the prairie grasses. Pages 427–430in M. Wali (ed.), Prairie: a multiple view. University of North Dakota Press, Grand Forks, ND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, R. M., and J. Jastrow. 1986. Soil studies at Fermilab support agricultural role for restored prairies.Restoration and Management Notes 4(2):62–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. G. 1981. Use of prairie vegetation on disturbed sites. Transportation research record 822, Landscape and Environmental Design, National Academy of Science, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, D. G. 1982. Principle of revegetating mined lands, wildlife values of gravel pits. Pages 51–58 in W. D. Svedarsky and R. D. Crawford (eds.), University of Minnesota Agricultural Experiment Station Miscellaneous Publication 17-1982, Crookston, MN.

  • National Academy of Sciences. 1981. Surface mining: soil, coal and society. National Research Council, National Academy Press, 233 pp.

  • National Research Council (NRC). 1983. Changing climate. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. 1983. A regional landscape approach to maintain diversity.BioScience 33(11):700–706.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noss, R. 1985a. Letter to the editor,Restoration and Management Notes 3(2).

  • Noss, R. 1985b. Wilderness recovery and ecological restoration: an example for Florida.Earth First.

  • Parmenter, R. R., J. A. MacMahon, M. E. Waaland, M. M. Stuebe, P. Landres, and C. M. Chrissafulli. 1985. Reclamation of surface coal mines in western Wyoming for wildlife habitat: a preliminary analysis.Reclamation and Revegetation Research 4:93–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. L. 1985. Global climate change: a challenge for restoration ecology.Restoration and Management Notes 3(2):62–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, R. L., and J. D. S. Darling. 1985. The greenhouse effect and nature reserves.BioScience 35:707–717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, J. A. 1984. Learning by doing.Restoration and Management Notes 2(2):55–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, M. S. 1985. Critique of present wetlands mitigation policies in the United States based on an analysis of past restoration projects in San Francisco bay.Environmental Management 9(1):71–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Race, M. S., and D. R. Christie. 1982. Coastal zone development: mitigation, marsh creation, and decision-making.Environmental Management 6:317–328.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafaill, B. L., and W. G. Vogel. 1978. A Guide for revegetation of surface-mined lands for wildlife in eastern Kentucky and West Virginia. FWS 14-16-009-77-923.

  • Riskind, D. H., and A. G. Davis. 1975. Prairie management and restoration in the state parks of Texas. Pages 369–373in M. K. Wali (ed.), Prairie: a multiple view. University of North Dakota Press, Grand Forks, ND.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rock, H. 1976. Prairie propagation handbook. Boerner Botanical Gardens, Hales Corners, WI.

  • Rorslett, B. 1978. Some ecological implications of freshwater systems restoration. Pages 339–346in M. W. Holdgate and M. J. Woodman (eds.), The breakdown and restoration of ecosystems. Plenum, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sagal, Mary, and W. R. Jordan, III. 1986. Getting an education and finding a job in the reclamation busiess.Restoration and Management Notes 4:1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, P. 1970. A practical restoration method for tallgrass prairie. Pages 63–64in P. Schramm (ed.), Proceedings of a symposium on prairie and prairie restoration, Knox College, Galesburg, IL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramm, P. 1978. The do's and don'ts of prairie restoration. Pages 139–150in D. C. Glenn-Lewin (ed.), Fifth midwest prairie conference proceedings, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff, D. S., and L. G. Abele. 1976. Island biogeography theory and conservation practice.Science 191:285–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. R., with B. S. Smith. 1980. The prairie garden. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyser, C. A. 1982. Nature's design. Rodale Press, XXX, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soots, R. F., and M. C. Landin. 1978. Development and management of avian habitat on dredged material islands. Technical Report DS-78-18, Dredged Material Research Program, US Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Office, Chief of Engineers, US Army, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperry, T. M. 1983. Analysis of the University of Wisconsin-Madison prairie restoration project. Pages 140–146in R. Brewer (ed.), Proceedings of the eighth North American prairie conference. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes, L. 1984. Letter to the editor,Restoration and Management Notes 2(2):56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes, L. 1985. Letter to the editor,Restoration and Management Notes 3(2):59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Army Corps of Engineers. 1982. Draft impact analysis of the corps regulatory program 112. Memorandum, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Code (USC). 1981. 33 Section 1344 Supplement V.

  • United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USDA). 1985a. An annotated bibliography of surfacemined area reclamation research. Northern Forest Experiment Station, Berea, KY.

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service (USDA). 1985b. Riparian ecosystems and their management: reconciling conflicting uses. First North American riparian conference. Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, General Technical Report, RM-120. National Information Service, Springfield, VA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Valk, A. G., and C. B. Davis. 1979. A reconstruction of the recent vegetational history of a prairie glacial marsh, Eagle Lake, Iowa, from its seed bank.Aquatic Botany 6:25–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, W. G. 1977. Revegetation of surface-mined lands in the east. Pages 167–172in Forests for people: a challenge in world affairs. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters, 1977 National Convention. Bethesda, MD.

  • Waltham, P., and O. L. Gilbert. 1978. Artificial diversification of grassland with native herbs.Journal of Environmental Management 7:29–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warkins, T. E., and E. A. Howell. 1983. Introduction of selected prairie forbs into an established tallgrass prairie restoration. Pages 140–146in R. Brewer (ed.), Proceedings of the eighth North American prairie conference. Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildman-Evans, E., and B. Albright. 1984. Mesic forest restoration results influenced by topography, microclimate (Wisconsin).Restoration and Management Notes 2:19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willeke, G. E., and A. D. Baldwin. 1983. An evaluation of river restoration techniques in northwestern Ohio. Miami University, Oxford, Ohio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, L. L. (ed.) 1985. Senate approves farm bill.Outdoor News Bulletin 39(29): 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O., and E. O. Willis. 1975. Applied biogeography. Pages 522–234in M. Cody and J. M. Diamond (eds.), Ecology and evolution of communities. Belknap, Cambridge, MA.

  • Woodhouse, W. W., Jr., and P. L. Knutson. 1982. Atlantic coastal marshes. Pages 45–70in R. R. Lewis (ed.), Creation and restoration of coastal plant communities. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zedler, J. B. 1982. The ecology of southern California coastal salt marshes: a community profile. US Fish and Wildlife Service, Biological Services Program, Washington, DC. FWS/OBS-81/54. 110 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Wisconsin Arboretum and Center for Restoration Ecology, USA

    William R. Jordan III

  2. University of Wisconsin-Madison, 53706, Madison, Wisconsin, USA

    William R. Jordan III

  3. The Conservation Foundation, Washington D.C., USA

    Robert L. Peters II

  4. Institute for Land Rehabilitation and Department of Range Science, Utah State University, Logan, Utah, USA

    Edith B. Allen

Authors
  1. William R. Jordan III
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Robert L. Peters II
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Edith B. Allen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jordan, W.R., Peters, R.L. & Allen, E.B. Ecological restoration as a strategy for conserving biological diversity. Environmental Management 12, 55–72 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867377

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867377

Key words

Search

Navigation