Skip to main content
Log in

The environmental audit. II. Application to stream network design

  • Forum
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The planning and execution of water quality management programs requires careful collection and analysis of data coupled with a systematic review and analysis of programmatic success. The environmental audit is a tool which facilitates improved water quality planning and management. This article demonstrates the utility of the environmental audit by reviewing portions of a comprehensive review of the water quality management program for the state of Idaho. The audit is a tool which forces careful design of a sampling program before data are collected. In the audit approach, program objectives are clearly stated prior to initiation of sampling. Stated objectives are also evaluated regularly to identify tension points, that is, conflicts between expectations and reality. In the example taken from Idaho, a management review team followed a directive to redesign the water quality monitoring program. We present a summary of the redesign as proposed by that team, to illustrate the results of a typical review of monitoring programs. That summary is followed by an example of how the proposed program would differ if the audit approach had been used. The two approaches offered both coincident and conflicting recommendations. Management review team and audit recommendations for lake sampling programs were similar even though a different process was used to develop the recommendations. The most striking contrast between the two results lies in the review team's approach to the problem. The directives followed, and the team's responses, concentrate on tools, such as increasing biological monitoring or reliance on monthly BWMP stations. In contrast, the audit results stress addressing management questions for which clear objectives have been stated, depending on specific tools only as needed to meet stated objectives. Although the audit does integrate externalities in its structure, it is little affected by economic or political influences. A major strength of the audit approach is its ability to provide defensible data for management decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Crimm, R. 1976. Basic water monitoring program. US Environmental Protection Agency. Report no. EPA 440/9-76-025, Washington, DC. 51 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deason, J. P., and K. P. White, Jr. 1984. Specification of objectives by group processes in multiobjective water resources planning.Water Resources Research 20:189–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duda, A. M., M. T. El-Ashry, and A. Broch. 1984. Coping with uncertainty in environmental decisions.Journal of Soil and Water Conservation (March–April): 96–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haimes, Y. Y. 1984. Integrated risk and uncertainty assessment in water resources within a multiobjective framework.Journal of Hydrology 68:405–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herricks, E. E. 1983. Aspects of monitoring in river basin management.Water Science and Technology 16:259–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herricks, E. E., and J. Cairns, Jr. 1982. Biological monitoring, part III: receiving system methodology based on community structure.Water Resources 16:141–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hocutt, C. H. 1975. Assessment of a stressed macroinvertebrate community.Water Research Bulletin 11:820–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, R. G., J. H. Carroll, and J. C. Staves. 1984. Water quality management decisions on two Oklahoma streams.Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 56:274–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram, H. M., D. E. Mann, G. D. Weatherford, and H. J. Cortner. 1984. Guidelines for institutional analysis in water resources planning.Water Resources Research 20:323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lettenmaier, D. P. 1977. Detection of trends in stream quality: monitoring network design and data analysis. Harris Hydraulics Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle. Technical report 51. 181 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loftis, J. C., and R. C. Ward. 1979. Regulatory water quality monitoring networks: statistical and economic considerations. US EPA 600/4/79-055. 89 pp.

  • Matthews, R. A., A. L. Buikema, Jr., J. Carins, Jr., and J. H. Rodgers, Jr. 1982a. Biological monitoring, part IIA: receiving system functional methods, relationships, and indices.Water Research 16:129–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, R. A., P. E. Kondratiett, and A. L. Buikema, Jr. 1982b. A seasonal analysis of stress in a stream ecosystem using a nontaxonomic approach.American Society of Testing Materials ASTM STP 766:326–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, J. A., R. C. Ward, and J. C. Loftis. 1984. Survey of state water quality monitoring programs.Environmental Management 8:21–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Platt, J. R. 1963. Strong inference.Science 146:347–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, D. J., C. Corley, and H. Chien. 1983. Pollution source analysis using 1-dimensional time series.Environmental Management 7:421–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer, D. J., H. W. Kerster, J. A. Perry, and S. D. Cox. 1985. The environmental audit. I. concepts.Environmental Management 9:191–198 (this issue).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, A. L. 1984. Costs and precision in a stream sampling program.Hydrobiologia 111:147–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • US Government Accounting Office. 1981. Better monitoring techniques are needed to assess the quality of rivers and streams, vol. 1. Report CED-81-30, US General Accounting Office, Washington, DC. 121 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Belle, G., and J. P. Hughes. 1984. Nonparametric tests for trend in water quality.Water Resources Research 20:127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallin, T. R., and D. J. Schaeffer. 1979. Illinois redesigns its ambient water quality monitoring network.Environmental Management 3:313–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward, R. C., and J. C. Loftis., 1983. Incorporating the stochastic nature of water quality into management.Journal of the Water Pollution Control Federation 55:408–414.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Perry, J.A., Schaeffer, D.J., Kerster, H.W. et al. The environmental audit. II. Application to stream network design. Environmental Management 9, 199–207 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867076

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01867076

Key words

Navigation