Skip to main content
Log in

Plant response to Los Angeles aqueduct construction in the Mojave desert

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Construction of the 1913 Los Angeles aqueduct system had a different effect on vegetation productivity, diversity, and stability in the Mojave Desert than did construction of the 1970 aqueduct. Drastic disturbance was found to impede vegetation recovery, whereas slight disturbance sometimes enhanced vegetation. Comparisons of productivity, diversity, and stability measures for both aqueducts show apparent similarities of vegetation cover, biomass, and density. However, these similarities often vanish when one considers qualitative factors, such as proportion of long-lived species and typical cominants of undisturbed communities. Percentage composition of common long-lived perennials represents a good qualitative measure to supplement quantitative comparisons. Enhancement of vegetation along the right-of-way transects of the 1913 aqueduct shows considerable recovery, owing to the more than 65 years that have passed since construction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature cited

  • Bureau of Land Management. 1979.Weight density values for perennial plants of the Colorado and Mojave Deserts, California. Desert Plan Program, Bureau of Land Management, Riverside, California File report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, K. 1970. A test for comparing diversities based on the Shanon formula.Journal of Theoretical Biology 29: 151–154

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, H. B., F. C. Vasek, and T. Yonkers. 1975. Productivity, diversity and stability relationships in Mojave Desert roadside vegetation.Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club. 102: 106–114

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay, B. L. 1979. Summary of revegetation attempts on the second Los Angeles aqueduct.Mojave revegetation notes, Agronomy and Range Science, University California, Davis No. 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lathrop, E. W. 1979.Plant response studies to utility construction in the Mojave Desert, California. Contract No. Ca-060-CT8-53. Desert Plan Program, Bureau of Land Management, Riverside, California Final report.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, R. P. 1967. An index of diversity and the relation of certain concepts to diversity.Ecology 48: 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C. H. 1940. Plant succession in theLarrea-Flourensia climax.Ecology 21: 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C. M. 1971. Vegetation study of the Los Angeles Aqueduct. Bureau of Land Management, Portland, Ore. File report, looseleaf, 9 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, C. M., and L. Walgren. 1972.Rehabilitation of disturbed arid areas with native desert species in the Mojave Desert. Bureau of Land Management, Bakersfield, California File report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1969.Biometry. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasek, F. C. 1979. Plant succession in the Mojave Desert. In Wright, W. (ed.) California deserts-fragile ecosystems. Symposium proceedings, Southern California Botanists, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California In press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasek, F. C., H. B. Johnson, and D. H. Eslinger. 1975a. Effects of pipeline construction on creosote bush scrub vegetation of the Mojave Desert.Madrono 23: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasek, F. C., H. B. Johnson, and G. D. Brum. 1975b. Effects of power transmission lines on vegetation of the Mojave Desert.Madrono 23: 114–129.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lathrop, E.W., Archbold, E.F. Plant response to Los Angeles aqueduct construction in the Mojave desert. Environmental Management 4, 137–148 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866510

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01866510

Keywords

Navigation