Notes
L. Jonathan Cohen, ‘Some Remarks on Grice's Views about the Logical Particles of Natural Language’, in Y. Bar-Hillel (ed.),Pragmatics of Natural Languages, 1971, pp. 50–68. Grice's second Lecture has now been published separately under the litle of ‘Logic and Conversation’, inThe Logic of Grammar (ed. by D. Davidson and G. Harman), 1975, pp. 64–75.
Ralph C. S. Walker, ‘Conversational Implicature’, in S. Blackburn (ed.),Meaning, Reference and Necessity, 1975 pp. 133–181.
Op. cit., p. 153.
Op. cit., p. 139.
Op. cit., p. 140.
Op. cit., p. 139.
Op. cit., p. 138.
Op. cit., pp. 143/4.
Op. cit., p. 134.
Cf. L. Jonathan Cohen and Avishai Margalit. ‘The Role of Inductive Reasoning in the Interpretation of Metaphor’,Synthese 21 (1970) 469–487, reprinted in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.),Semantics of Natural Language, 1972, pp. 722–740.
R. C. S. Walker,op, cit., pp. 158/9.
Op. cit., p. 140.
Op. cit., p.. 178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cohen, L.J. Can the conversationalist hypothesis be defended?. Philos Stud 31, 81–90 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857178
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01857178