Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency and profitability: An inverse relationship according to the size of Austrian firm?

  • Published:
Small Business Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper tries to shed some light on the Austrian situation of the efficiency of firms according to their size class. For total Austria we find that large firms seem to be more efficient with respect to value-added per employee, but small firms are more efficient with respect to the gross residual quota and to profitability (= (value added — wages)/(value added)). On the other side a similar analysis for Upper Austria does not show this result. Here firms with the size of 500 employees or more seem to be the most efficient with respect to efficiency and profitability, and only the employment cost efficiency criteria reveals the picture, the smaller the firm, the more cost effective it seems to be. Hence, the result obtained from most studies in Europe, that at least the biggest firms are not the most efficient, can only be confirmed to a limited extent for (Upper) Austria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acs, Z. and D. B.Audretsch (eds.), 1990,The Economics of Small Firms: An European Challenge, Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., 1982, ‘Flexibilität, Wachstum und Rentabilitäts-unterschiede in der Österreichischen Industrie’,Quartalshefte der Girozentrale 17 (2), 81–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., 1987a, ‘Business Response to Increasing Uncertainty: Survey Results Confronted with Industrial Economics’, report at the CIRET-Conference, Zuerich.

  • Aiginger, K., 1987b,Production and Decision Theory Under Uncertainty, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K., 1988, ‘Flexibility in Economic Models and Trends to Increase Flexibility in Industry’, report at the NOEG-Conference.

  • Aiginger, K. and G.Tichy, 1984,Die Größe der Kleinen, Wien: Signum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aiginger, K. and G.Tichy, 1991, ‘Small Firms and the Merger Mania’,Small Business Economics 3 (2), 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armington, M. C. and M. Odle, 1983, ‘Further Examination of Sources of Recent Employment Growth’,The Brookings Institution.

  • Auquier, A., 1980, ‘Sizes of Firms, Exporting Behavior and the Structure of French Industry’,Journal of Industrial Economics 23, 203–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bade, F. J., 1987, ‘Die wachstumspolitische bedeutung kleiner und mittlerer Unternehmen’, in M.Fritsch and C.Hull (eds.),Arbeitsplate und Regionalestwicklung, Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, R. 1989,Organisationsgröße und Effizienz', Theoretische Grundlagen und erste empirische Evidenz für die Industriebetriebe Oberösterreichs, Ph.D. dissertation an der Johannes Kepler Universität Linz.

  • Bartel, R., 1990, ‘Betriebsgröße und Effizienz in der oberösterreichischen Industire: Erste empirische Ergebnisse,Zeitschrift für Betriebswirtschaft 60(7), 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartel, R. and F.Schneider, 1987, ‘Die Ursachen der Krise in der Verstaatlichten Industries: Einige theoretische Überlegungen’,Wirtschaftspolitische Blätter 34(3), 275–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, D. L., 1979 ‘The Job Generation Process’, MIT, mimeo.

  • Bock, K., 1987, ‘Unterschiede im Beschäftigtenverhalten zwischen kleinen und großen Unternehmen’, in M.Fritsch and C.Hull, (eds.),Arbeitsplate und Regionalertwicklung, Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, P. and H.Dewhurst (eds.), 1986,Small Business in Europe, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaloupek, G. K., 1989, ‘Industrial Policy in Austria’,Materialien zu Wirtschaft und Gesellschat, 40, Wien.

  • Dahremöller, A., 1985, Der Beitrag mittelständischer Unternehmer zur Beschäftigung unter Berücksichtigung der Unternehmens-fluktuation’,IFM Materialien 32, Bonn.

  • Eckart, W., E.VonEinem, and K.Stahl, 1987, Dynamik der Arbeitsplatzentwicklung, in M.Fritsch and C.Hull (eds.),Arbeitsplate und Regionalentwicklung, Berlin: Sigma.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch, M., forthcoming, ‘The Role of Small Firms in West Germany’, in E. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in West and East Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Geroski, P. A. and S.Schwalbach (eds.) 1991,Entry and Market Contestability. An International Comparison, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gowen, K., D.Brolchain, and V.Andrews, 1986. ‘The Republic of Ireland’, In P.Burns and H.Dewhurst (eds.),Small Business in Europe, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, T., forthcoming, ‘U.S. Government Policy Toward Small Firms in the 1990s’,Small Business Economics.

  • Hoffmann, H. J., 1986, ‘Mindestoptimale Betriebsgrößen und die Ursachen suboptimaler Kapazitäten’,Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik 201(2).

  • Hughes, A., forthcoming, ‘Industrial Concentration and the Small Business Sector in the UK: The 1980's in Historical Perspective’, in Z. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in West and East Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Invernizzi, B. and R. Revelli, forthcoming, ‘Small Firms in the Italian Economy: Structural Changes and Evidence of Turbulence’, in E. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),Small Firms and Entreprereurship in West and East Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Irsch, N., 1988, ‘Zum Zusammenhang zwischen Unternehmensgröße und Rentabilität in der BRD in der Mitte der achtziger Jahre’,Jahrbücher für Nationalökonomie und Statistik.

  • Klejeweg, A. and R. Thurik, forthcoming, ‘Are There Decreasing Economies of Scale over Time in Dutch Manufacturing?’, in Z. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in West and East Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

  • Koenig, A. and G. Weißhuhn, 1988, ‘Size of Enterprises and Gains and Losses in the Economic Sectors of Western Germany’, paper presented at theConference of New Technology, Berlin.

  • Koenig, A. and G.Weißhuhn, 1990, ‘Changes in the Enterprise Size and Employment Levels in the Branches of the Federal Republic of Germany 1980 to 1986’, in R.Schetthat and M.Wagner (eds.),Technological Change and Employment, Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mata, J., forthcoming ‘Small Firms in the Portuguese Manufacturing Industries’, in Z. Acs and D. Audretsch (eds.),Small Firms and Entrepreneurship in West and East Countries, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Neumann, M., I., Böbel, and A. Haid, 1979, ‘Profitability, Risk and Market Structure in West German Industries’,Journal of Industrial Economics.

  • Pleitner, H., 1986, ‘Switzerland’, in P.Burns and H.Dewhurst (eds.),Small Business in Europe, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pratten, C., 1988, ‘A Survey on Economics of Scale: Eonomic Papers’, Commission of the European Communities, Internal Paper, October.

  • Reynolds, P. D., forthcoming, ‘Cross-National Comparisons of the Role of Small Firms Based on Longitudinal Cross-Regional Analysis’,Small Business Economics.

  • Scherer, F. M., 1980,Industrial Market Structure and Economic Performance, 2nd ed., Chicago: Rand McNally.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. and R.Bartel, 1989, ‘Gemein- versus Privatwirtschaft: Ein Effizienzvergleich’,Schriftenreihe des Lundwig Boltzmann Institutes für ökonomische Analysen wirtschafts politischer Aktivitäten, Band 5, Wien: Manzsche Verlags- und Universitätsbuchhandlung.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, F. and R.Bartel, 1991, ‘The Mess of the Public Industrial Production in Austria: A Typical Case of Public Sector Inefficiency?”,Public Choice 68(1), 17–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwalbach, J., forthcoming, ‘Small Firm Dynamics in Europe’,Small Business Economics.

  • Storey, D. J., forthcoming, ‘The Birth of New Firms — Does Unemployment Matter?: A Review of the Evidence’,Small Business Economics.

  • White, L. J., 1982, ‘The Determinantes of the Relative Importance of Small Business’,Review of Economics and Statistics 64, 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Revised version. A first draft (with the title “Austrian Industrial Policy: Does the Firm Size Matter?”) was presented at the conference “The Role of small Firms and Entrepreneurship: A Comparison between East and West Countries”, Science Center Berlin, Berlin, July 6–7, 1990. Comments and critics are appreciated.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schneider, F. Efficiency and profitability: An inverse relationship according to the size of Austrian firm?. Small Bus Econ 3, 287–296 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840610

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01840610

Keywords

Navigation