Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison between the action of carbonic acid and other acids upon the living cell

  • Abhandlungen
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Experiments on the comparative influence of CO2 and other acids upon the living cell, carried out with two objects (Paramaecium caudatum and the hairs of the anther filaments ofTradescantia virginica) have shown the following:

  1. 1.

    The different toxicity of CO2 and of other acids does not only depend on the different rapidity of their penetration (which in a number of cases is considerably higher than in other acids), for with an equally rapid penetration into the cell, the toxicity of these acids can be different.

  2. 2.

    According to the degree of their toxicity the investigated acids can be divided into two groups: I — including the mineral acids, citric acid and oxalic acid; and II — to which belong CO2 and the acids near to it, easily penetrating into the cell, valerianic and acetic acids, which are more toxic, although their pH is the same as in the I-st group.

  3. 3.

    The toxicity of the second group of acids does not depend on their pH, but on the concentration of the undissociated molecules, as their effect is the same with a considerably less acid pH, than that of the acids of the first group.

  4. 4.

    Carbonic acid stands by itself among all these acids, because of its narcotic action, which apparently depends on the CO2 molecule. The other acids are not able to cause narcosis.

  5. 5.

    Taking all this into consideration, carbonic acid can be characterised as an acid penetrating more easily into the cell than the other acids, acting as an acidifier in small doses, as a lethal agent in higher ones. Its penetrative and lethal properties do not depend on the H-ion concentration, but on the CO2 molecule. The narcotizing capacity is particularly characteristic for CO2 and creates a sharp difference between it and other acids.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Adolf, M. u.Pauli, W., 1924. Biochem. Zeitschr., Bd. 152, S. 360.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Becker, Z. E., 1933. Microbiology, vol. 3, No. 4, p. 160 (in russian).

    Google Scholar 

  3. -, 1934. Botan. Journ. U.S.S.R. (printed in russian).

  4. Brooks, M., 1923. U. S. Pub. Health Repts., No. 846, p. 1470.

    Google Scholar 

  5. —, 1923. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., vol. 20, p. 384.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bruchatowa, A., 1928. Acts of the Zwenigorod Hydrophysic Station. Institute of experimental Biology, Moscow, p. 124 (in russian).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chambers, R., 1922. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 5, p. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  8. —, 1928. Biol. Bull., vol. 55, p. 369.

    Google Scholar 

  9. — andPollack, H., 1927. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 10, p. 739.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chase, A. M. andGlaser, O., 1930. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 13, p. 627.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clowes, G. H. A. andSmith, H. W., 1923. Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. 64, p. 144.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Collander, R., Turpeinen, O. undFabritius, E., 1931. Protoplasma, Bd. 13, S. 348.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crosier, W., 1916. Journ. Biolog. Chem., vol. 24, p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  14. —, 1916. Journ. Biol. Chem., vol. 26, p. 217.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fraser, L., Mc. Ph., 1925. Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. 72, p. 119.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Galagiew, M. A. andMalm, E. N., 1932. Memoire of Acad. of Sc. U.S.S.R., Ser. 7, No. 1 (in russian).

  17. Gicklhorn, J. u.Keller, R., 1926. Zeitschr. f. wiss. Zoolog., Bd. 127, S. 244.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Gompel, M., 1925. Ann. de Physiol. et Physicochemie Biol., vol. 1, p. 166.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gutsrein, M., 1932. Protoplasma, Bd. 17, S. 454.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Harvey, N., 1911. Journ. Exper. Zool., vol. 10, p. 507.

    Google Scholar 

  21. —, 1915. Int. Zeitschr. f. phys.-chem. Biol., Bd. 1, S. 463.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Haywood, C., 1925. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 7, p. 693.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Jacobs, M. H., 1912. Journ. Exper, Zool., vol. 12, p. 519.

    Google Scholar 

  24. —, 1920. Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. 51, p. 321.

    Google Scholar 

  25. —, 1920. Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. 53, p. 457.

    Google Scholar 

  26. —, 1922. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 5, p. 181.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —, 1922. Biol. Bull., vol. 42, p. 14.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Jacques, A. G. andOsterhout, W. I. V., 1930. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 13, p. 625.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Krogh, 1919. Journ. of Physiol., vol. 52, p. 391.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Loeb, J., 1906. Arch. f. d. Gesamm. Physiol., Bd. 115, S. 564.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Loeb, L. andGilman, F., 1914. Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. 67, p. 526.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lopriore, G., 1895. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot., Bd. 28, S. 531.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Losina-Losinsrsky, L. K., 1926. Memoirs of Lesgaft Scientif. Inst., vol. 11, p. 57 (in russian).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Malm, E. N., 1930. Acts of Sevastopol Biol. Station., vol. 2 (in russian).

  35. Nikitinsky, J., 1928. Zentralbl. f. Bakter., II. Abt., Bd. 73.

  36. - undMudrezowa-Wyss, Fr. K., 1930. Zentralbl. f. Bakt., Abt. II, Bd. 81.

  37. Osterhout, W. I. V. andDorcas, 1925. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 9, p. 255.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pantin, C. F. A., 1923. Nature, vol. 111, p. 81.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Pearse, H. E., 1925. Arch. Int. Med., Bd. 35, S. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Pfeiffer, H., 1927. Protoplasma, Bd. 1, S. 434.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Pollack, H., 1928. Biol. Bull., vol. 55, p. 383.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Reiss, P., 1926. “Le pH intérieur cellulaire”. Paris.

  43. Reznikoff, P. andChambers, R., 1927. Journ. Gen. Physiol., vol. 10, p. 731.

    Google Scholar 

  44. — andPollack, H., 1928. Biol. Bull., vol. 55, p. 377.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Rumiantzew, A. undKedrovsky, B., 1927. Protoplasma, Bd. 1, S. 189.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Schaede, R., 1923. Ber. d. Deutsch. Bot. Ges., Bd. 41, S. 345.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schmidtmann, M., 1924. Biochem. Zeitschr., Bd. 150, S. 253.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sierakowski, S. undZajdel, R., 1924. Biochem. Zeitschr., Bd. 152, S. 111.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Small, J., 1929. “Hydrogen Ion Concentration of Plant cells and Tissues”. Protoplasma-Monographien. II. Berlin.

  50. Smith, 1926. Amer. Journ. of Physiol., vol. 76, p. 411.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Smith, H. W. andClowes, G. H. A., 1924. Amer. Journ. Physiol., vol. 68, p. 183.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Smith, E. P., 1923. Nature, vol. 112, p. 654.

    Google Scholar 

  53. —, 1933. Protoplasma, Bd. 18, S. 90.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Spek, J. undChambers, R., 1933. Protoplasma, Bd. 20, S. 376.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Thiel undStrohecker, 1914. Ber., Bd. 47, S. 945.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Vlès, F., 1925. Arch. phys. Biol., vol. 4, p. 228.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Wehrli-Hegner, J. undWyss, O. A. M., 1933. Biochem. Zeitschr., Bd. 266, S. 46.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Winterstein, 1919. „Die Narkose in ihrer Bedeutung für die allgemeine Physiologie“. Berlin.

  59. Wulff, P., 1926. Chemikerzeitung, Bd. 50, S. 732.

    Google Scholar 

  60. -, 1926. Kolloid-Zeitschrift, Bd. 40, Nr. 4.

  61. Zacharowa, T. M., 1925. Jahrb. f. wiss. Bot., Bd. 65, S. 61.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Becker, Z.E. A comparison between the action of carbonic acid and other acids upon the living cell. Protoplasma 25, 161–175 (1936). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01839067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01839067

Keywords

Navigation