Skip to main content
Log in

Prediction of hormone responsiveness by mammographic parenchymal pattern in advanced primary breast cancer

  • Report
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ninety-two women with advanced, unilateral breast cancer were classified according to the Wolfe and Nottingham classifications of mammographic parenchymal pattern (MPP). Both classifications of MPP were significantly correlated to the estrogen receptor (ER) status of the breast carcinoma, but could not be used for prediction of response to hormonal therapy. Age distribution was significantly different among Wolfe types as well as between ER groups, but a multiple regression analysis showed that both age and Wolfe pattern were significant and independent predictors of the ER status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nielsen NSM, Poulsen HS: Relation between mammographic findings and hormonal receptor content in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 145: 501–504, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  2. Broberg A, Glas U, Gustafsson SA, Hellstrom L, Somell A: Relation between mammographic pattern and estrogen receptor content in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 3: 201–207, 1983

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hinton CP, Roebuck EJ, Williams MR, Blamey RW, Glaves J, Nicholson RI, Griffiths K: Mammographic parenchymal patterns: Value as a predictor of hormone dependency and survival in breast cancer. Am J Roentgenol 144: 1103–1107, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ciatto S, Cecchini S, Iossa A, Grazzini G, Messeri G, Valenti L, Nunzi G, Bartolucci R, Costanzo FD: Association of estrogen receptors with parenchymal pattern at mammography. Radiology 170: 695–697, 1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wolfe JN: Risk for breast cancer development determined by mammographic parenchymal pattern. Cancer 37: 2486–2492, 1976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roebuck EJ: The importance of mammographic parenchymal patterns. Br J Radiol 55: 387–398, 1982

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hayward JL, Carbone PP, Heuson J-C, Kumaoka S, Segaloff A, Rubens RD: Assessment of response to therapy in advanced breast cancer. Eur J Cancer 13: 89–94, 1977

    Google Scholar 

  8. Andersen J, Ørntoft TE, Poulsen HS: Immunohistochemical demonstration of estrogen receptors (ER) in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human breast cancer tissue by use of a monoclonal antibody to ER. J Histochem Cytochem 36: 1553–1560, 1988

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Boyd NF, Fishell E, Tonkin K, Mobbs BG: Age as a confounding factor in the association of mammographic dysplasia and estrogen receptor concentration in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 10: 51–54, 1987

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, N.S.M., Andersen, J., Poulsen, H.S. et al. Prediction of hormone responsiveness by mammographic parenchymal pattern in advanced primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Tr 23, 219–222 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833518

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01833518

Key words

Navigation