Skip to main content
Log in

Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: Focus on the underserved

  • Guest editor's introduction
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In the last decade, numerous research and programmatic efforts have attempted to improve cancer screening practices among women from diverse race/ethnic backgrounds on the assumption that observed differences in breast cancer survival were largely due to differences in early detection practices. Recent data from the 1992 National Health Interview Survey and a 1992 survey in San Francisco Bay Area multiethnic communities indicate that rates of self-reported breast cancer screening tests among African American, Hispanic, and white women no longer differ significantly. However, there are large, persistent socioeconomic differences as reflected in educational and income levels, the recency of immigration, and English language proficiency. This emphasizes the continuing need for interventions tailored specifically for the underserved, with the racial, ethnic, and cultural composition of the intended audience informing educational messages and strategies. However, effective research interventions are complex and costly throughout the spectrum of outreach, inreach, and follow-up. Thus the generalizability of these strategies to under-funded providers and agencies in low-income communities may be limited. Therefore, as ongoing research continues to refine strategies, the application of effective community-based intervention should seek out potential partnerships with programs that provide the critical access to services. Cancer control scientists are well positioned to advocate for community-based infrastructures that facilitate translation of research into practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. American Cancer Society: California Cancer Facts & Figures 1994. American Cancer Society, California Division, Oakland, CA, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sondik E: Breast cancer trends: incidence, mortality, and survival. Cancer 74S:995–999,1994.

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Cancer Society: Cancer Facts & Figures for Minority Americans 1991. American Cancer Society, Atlanta, GA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Eley JW, Hill HA, Chen VW, Austin DF, Wesley MN, Muss HB, Greenberg RS, Coates RJ, Correa P, Redmond CK, Hunter CP, Jerman AA, Kurman R, Blacklow R, Shapiro S, Edwards BK: Racial differences in survival from breast cancer. JAMA 272: 947–954, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baquet CR, Ringen K, Pollack ES, Young JL, Horm JW: Cancer among blacks and other minorities: statistical profiles.In: NCI, NIH Pub 86-2785. Bethesda, Md, 1986.

  6. Leffall LD: Breast cancer in black women. CA-A Cancer J for Clinicians 31:208–211, 1981.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dawson DA, Thompson GB: Breast cancer risk factors and screening: United States, 1987. Vital Health Stat (10) 172. DHHS publication PHS 90-1500, 1989.

  8. Howard J: Using mammography for cancer control: an unrealized potential. Cancer 37:33–48, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Richardson JL, Marks G, Solis JM, Collins LM, Birba L, Hisserich JC: Frequency and adequacy of breast cancer screening among elderly hispanic women. Prev Med 16:761–774,1987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Breen N: (personal communication) Applied Research Branch, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Cancer Institute, 1994.

  11. Hiatt RA (Principal Investigator): Breast and Cervical Cancer Intervention Studies (RO1-CA-54605).

  12. Breen N, Kessler L: Changes in use of screening mammography: evidence from the 1987 and 1990 national health interview surveys. Am J Public Health 84:62–67, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gordon NP, Hiatt RA, Lampert DI: Concordance of self-reported data and medical record audit for six cancer screening procedures. J Natl Cancer Inst 85: 566–570, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hiatt RA, Perez-Stable E, Sabogal F, Quesenberry CP Jr, Otero-Sabogal R, McPhee S: Agreement between self-reported early cancer detection practices and medical audits in hispanic compared with non-hispanic white health plan workers in Northem California. Prev Med (in press).

  15. Neale AV: Racial and marital status influences on 10 year survival from breast cancer. J Clin Epidemiol 47:475–483, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Swanson GM, Ragheb NE, Lin CS, Hankey BF, Miller B, Horn-Ross P, White E, Liff JM, Harlan LC, McWhorter WP, Mullan PB, Key CR: Breast cancer among black and white women in the 1980s. Cancer 72:788–798, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Elledge RM, Clark GM, Chamness GC, Osborne CK: Tumor biologic factors and breast cancer prognosis among white, Hispanic, and black women in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 86:705–712, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Freeman HP: Race, poverty, and cancer (editorial). J Natl Cancer Inst 83:526–527, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerner JF, Dusenbury L, Mandelblatt JS: Poverty and cultural diversity: challenges for health promotion among the medically underserved. Annu Rev Publ Health 14:355–377, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Baquet CR, Horm JW, Gibbs T, Greenwald P: Socioeconomic factors and cancer incidence among blacks and whites. J Natl Cancer Inst 83:551–557, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. McWhorter WP, Shatzkin AG, Horm JW, Brown CC: Contribution of socioeconomic status to black/ white difference in cancer incidence. Cancer 63: 982–987, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Wells BL, Horm JW: Stage at diagnosis in breast cancer: race and socioeconomic factors. Am J Public Health 82:1383–1385, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Farley TA, Flannery JT: Late-stage diagnosis of breast cancer in women of lower socioeconomic status: public health implications. Am J Public Health 79:1508–1512, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Krieger N, Rowley DL, Herman AA, Avery B, Phillips MT: Racism, sexism, and social class: implications for studies of health, disease, and wellbeing. Am J Prev Med 9:82–122, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Freimuth VS, Mettger W: Is there a hard-to-reach audience? Public Health Rep 105:232–239, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bloom JR, Grazier K, Hodge F, Hayes WA: Factors affecting the use of screening mammography among African American women. Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention 1:75–82, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Prochaska JO, Redding CA, Harlow LL, Rossi JS, Velicer WF: The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: a review. Health Educ Quarterly 21(4):471–486, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  28. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health: The picture of health: how to increase breast cancer screening in your community. NIH Pub #94-3604, 1993.

  29. AMC Cancer Research Center: Breast and cervical cancer public education programs (summary). Denver, 1992 (unpublished report).

  30. AMC Cancer Research Center: Breast and cervical screening: barriers and use among specific populations. (literature review) Denver, 1991 (unpublished report).

  31. AMC Cancer Research Center: Breast and cervical screening: barriers and use among specific populations (literature review). Denver, 1992 (unpublished report).

  32. AMC Cancer Research Center: Breast and cervical cancer screening: barriers and use among specific populations (literature review). Denver, 1993 (unpublished report).

  33. USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Resources for reaching special populations (selected annotations). January 1994.

  34. Greenwald P, Cullen JW, McKenna JW: Cancer prevention and control: from research through applications. J Natl Cancer Inst 79:389–400, 1987.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Zapka JG, Stoddard AM, Costanza ME, Greene HL: Breast cancer screening by mammography utilization and associated factors. Am J Public Health 79:1499–1502, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rimer BK, Keintz MK, Engstrom PF, Rosan JR: Why women resist screening mammography: patientrelated barriers. Radiology 172:243–246, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Burg MA, Lane DS, Polednak AP: Age group differences in the use of breast cancer screening tests: the effects of health care utilization and socioeconomic variables. J Aging and Health 2:514–530, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Hayward RA, Shapiro MF, Freeman HE, Corey CR: Who gets screened for cervical and breast cancer? Arch Intern Med 148:1177–1181, 1988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. King E, Rimer BK: Mammography-related beliefs of older women: a survey of an HMO population. J Aging and Hlth 5:82–100, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Calle EE, Flanders WD, Thun MJ, Martin LM: Demographic predictors of mammography and Pap smear screening in US women. Am J Public Health 83:53–60, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Stein JA, Fox SA, Murata PJ: The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on usage of mammography. J Hlth Soc Behav 32:101–113, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Burack RC, Liang J: Acceptance and completion of mammography by older black women. Am J Public Health 79:721–726, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Vernon SW, Vogel VG, Halabi S, Jackson GL, Lundy RO, Peters GA: Breast cancer screening behaviors and attitudes in three racial/ethnic groups. Cancer 69:165–174, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Stein JA, Fox SA: Language preference as an indicator of mammography use among Hispanic women. J Natl Cancer Inst 82:1715–1716, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Bloom JR: Early detection of cancer: psychologic and social dimensions. Cancer 74:1464–1473, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Whitman S, Ansell D, Lacy L, Chen EH, Ebie N, Dell J, Phillips CW: Patterns of breast and cervical cancer screening in 3 public health centers in an inner-city urban area. Am J Public Health 81:1651–1653, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Eng E: The save our sisters project. Cancer 72: 1071–1077, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. McCoy CB, Nielsen BB, Chitwood DD, Zavertnik JJ, Khoury EL: Increasing the cancer screening of the medically underserved in South Florida. Cancer 67:1808–1813, 1991.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Suarez L, Nichols DC, Pulley L, Brady CA, McAlister A: Local health departments implement a theorybased model to increase breast and cervical cancer screening. Public Health Rep 108:477–482, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lacey L: Cancer prevention and early detection strategies for reaching underserved urban, low-income black women: barriers and objectives. Cancer 72:1078–1083, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rimer B: Improving the use of cancer screening for older women. Cancer 72:1084–1087, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Zapka JG, Harris DR, Hosmer D, Costanza ME, Mas E, Barth R: Effect of a community health center intervention on breast cancer screening among Hispanic American women. Health Services Research 28:223–235, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Bastani R, Marcus AC, Maxwell AE, Das IP, Yan KX: Evaluation of an intervention to increase mammography screening in Los Angeles. Prev Med 23:83–90, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Burach RC, Gimotty PA, Stengle W, Eckert D, Warbasse L, Moncrease A: Detroit's avoidable mortality project: breast cancer control for inner-city women. Public Health Rep 104:527–535, 1989.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Green LW, Kreuter MW: Health Promotion Planning: an educational and environmental approach, second edition. Mayfield Publishing Company, Mt. View CA, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Kotler P, Roberto EL: Social marketing: strategies for changing public behavior. The Free Press, New York, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  57. AMC Cancer Research Center: Breast and cervical cancer screening: focus groups with ethnically diverse, low income women: a report, 1992.

  58. Rakowski W, Fulton JP, Feldman JP: Women's decision making about mammography: a replication of the relationship between stages of adoption and decisional balance. Health Psychology 12:209–214, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Rimer BK: Audiences and messages for breast and cervical cancer screening. Health Educ Quarterly (in press).

  60. Friedman LC, Nelson DV, Webb JA, Hoffman LP, Baer PE: Dispositional optimism, self-efficacy, and health beliefs as predictors of breast self-examination. Am J Prev Med 10:130–135, 1994.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Baines CJ: Breast self-examination. Cancer 69: 1942–1946, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Lerman C, Rimer B, Trock B, Balshem A, Engstrom PF: Factors associated with repeat adherence to breast cancer screening. Prev Med 19:1–12, 1990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Perez-Stable E: Mexican and South American cultures. Presentation to the President's Cancer Panel Meeting on Cancer and the Cultures of America. San Francisco, November 30, 1994.

  64. Howe HL: Repeat mammography among women over 50 years of age. Am J Prev Med 8:182–185, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Guadagnoli E, Rossi JS, DiClemente CC: Patterns of change: dynamic typology applied to smoking cessation. Multivariate Behav Res 26:83–107, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  66. DiClemente CC: Self-efficacy and the addictive behaviors. J Soc Clin Psychol 4:302–315, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  67. USDHHS, Centers for Disease Control: Community health advisors: models, research, and practice. (selected annotations- US. Volume I) September 1994.

  68. Hogness CG, Engelstad LP, Linck LM, Schorr KA: Cervical cancer screening in an urban emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 21(8):933–939, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. CDC: Implementation of the breast and cervical cancer early mortality Act: 1993 progress report to Congress. Atlanta: US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, 1994.

  70. Hurley SF, Kaldor JM: The benefits and risks of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Epidemiol Rev 14:101–130, 1992.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Eaton A, Ernster V: Positive predictive value of screening mammography by age and family history of breast cancer. JAMA 270:2444–2450, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Results from the national breast and cervical cancer early detection program, October 31, 1991 — September 30, 1993. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 43:530–534, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Lee JM: Screening and informed consent. N Engl J Med 328:438–440, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Kreuter MW: Human behavior and cancer: forget the magic bullet! Cancer 72:996–1001, 1993.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiatt, R.A., Pasick, R.J. Unsolved problems in early breast cancer detection: Focus on the underserved. Breast Cancer Res Tr 40, 37–51 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806001

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01806001

Key words

Navigation