Summary
Screening for breast cancer using the combination of physical examination of the breasts and mammography was effective in women age 50 or more in the HIP study. However, major questions remain, especially the benefit of screening women age 40–49, and the independent effect of mammography. Such questions can only be answered by large-scale randomized controlled trials, and trials to answer these questions are now underway in Canada (the NBSS) and Sweden. Only the NBSS, however, is attempting to replicate the HIP study in women age 40–49, and to evaluate the additional contribution of mammography to annual physical examination in women age 50–59. The Swedish studies are evaluating the effectiveness of mammography alone, while studies in Britain will help to evaluate breast self-examination (BSE) and biannual mammography with annual physical examination. Because much of the benefit in HIP could have derived from the physical examination, it is necessary to complete the present trials before population-based screening for breast cancer using mammography can be advocated. Trials are justifiable because the risk of mammographic screening seems likely to be negligible, and the use of the combination of annual mammography and physical examination to be cost-effective.
In the meantime, there seems no immediate substitute on a population basis for efficient physical examination of the breasts by primary care physicians coupled with breast self-examination by the woman. Techniques such as ultrasound and diaphanography seem unlikely to supplant mammography in screening, and in any case, have to be evaluated in comparison with mammography.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moore FD: Breast self-examination. New Engl J Med 299: 304–305, 1978
Cole P, Austin H: Breast self-examination: an adjuvant to early cancer detection. Am J Pub Health 71: 572–574, 1981
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination: The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 121: 1193–1250, 1979
Fabia J, Bernard PM, Hill G: Recent time trends of agespecific death rates from breast cancer. Quebec and other provinces, 1965 through 1974. Can Med Assoc J 116: 1135–1138, 1977
Shapiro S, Strax P, Venet L, Venet W: Changes in 5-year breast cancer mortality in a breast cancer screening program. Seventh National Cancer Conference Proceedings. American Cancer Society, January 1974, pp 663–678
Shapiro S: Evidence on screening for breast cancer from a randomized trial. Cancer 39: 2772–2782, 1977
Beahrs O, Shapiro S, Smart C: Report of the Working Group to review the National Cancer Institute American Cancer Society Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Projects. J Natl Cancer Inst 62: 640–709, 1978
Shapiro S: Ten to fourteen-year effects of breast cancer screening on mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 69: 349–355, 1982
Hutchison GB, Shapiro S: Lead time gained by diagnostic screening for breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 41: 665–681, 1968
Zelen M, Feinleib M: On the theory of screening for chronic disease. Biometrika 56: 601–614, 1969
Breslow L, Thomas LB, Upton AC (chairmen): Final reports of the National Cancer Institute ad hoc working groups on Mammography in Screening for Breast Cancer and summary report of their joint findings and recommendations. J Natl Cancer Inst 59: 467–541, 1977
Pasternack BS, Strax P: Usefulness of statistical models to assess the benefit of breast cancer screening (letter). J Natl Cancer Inst 63: 1109–1110, 1979
Prorok PC, Hankey BF, Bundy BN: Concepts and problems in the evaluation of screening programs. J Chron Dis 34: 159–171, 1981
Shapiro S: Reply to Pasternack and Strax (letter). J Natl Cancer Inst 63: 1110, 1979
Pollack ES, Horm JW: Trends in cancer incidence and mortality in the United States 1969–76. J Natl Cancer Inst 64: 1091–1103, 1980
Leger JL, Naimark AP, Beique RA, McFarlane DV, Miller S, Miller AB: Report of the ad hoc committee on mammography. J Canad Assoc Radiol 25: 3–21, 1974
Bailar JC: Mammography: a contrary view. Ann Intern Med 84: 77–84, 1976
Beahrs OH, Smart CR: Diagnosis of minimal breast cancers in the BCDDP. The 66 questionable cases. Cancer 43: 848–850, 1979
Miller AB: Risk benefit in mass screening programs for breast cancer. Semin Oncol 5: 351–359, 1978
Baker LH: Breast cancer detection demonstration project: five-year summary report. Ca — A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 32: 194–225, 1982
Moskovitz M, Gartside PS: Evidence of breast cancer mortality reduction — aggressive screening in women under age 50. Am J Roentgenol 138: 911–916, 1982
Miller AB (ed): Screening in Cancer, UICC Technical Report Series Vol 40. International Union Against Cancer, Geneva, 1978
Howe GR, Sherman GJ, Seminciew RM, Miller AB: Estimated benefits and risks of screening for breast cancer. Can Med Assoc J 124: 399–403, 1981
American College of Radiology: Board approves mammography policy, summary of current opinion. Bull Am Coll Radiol 32: 1, 1976
American Cancer Society: Guidelines for the cancerrelated check-up: recommendations and rationale. Ca — A Cancer Journal for Clinicians 30: 194–240, 1980
Dales LG, Freidman GD, Collen MF: Evaluating periodic multi-phasic health check-ups: a controlled trial. J Chron Dis 32: 385–404, 1979
De Waard F, Rombach JJ, Collette HJA: The Dom-project for the early diagnosis of breast cancer in the city of Utrecht, the Netherlands.In AB Miller (ed): Screening in Cancer, UICC Technical Report Series Vol 40. International Union Against Cancer, Geneva, 1978, pp 183–200
UK Trial of Early Detection of Breast Cancer Group: Trial of early detection of breast cancer: description of method. Brit J Cancer 44: 618–627, 1981
Tabar L, Gad A: Screening for breast cancer: the Swedish trial. Radiology 138: 219–222, 1981
Lundgren B: Efficiency of single-view mammography: rate of interval cancer cases. J Natl Cancer Inst 62: 799–803, 1979
Anderson I, Andren L, Hildell J, Linell F, Ljungqvist U, Pettersson H: Breast cancer screening with mammography. A population-based, randomized trial with mammography as the only screening mode. Radiology 132: 273–276, 1979
National Cancer Institute of Canada: National breast cancer screening study gets underway. Can Med Assoc J 122: 243–244, 1980
Miller AB, Howe GR, Wall C: The National Study of Breast Cancer Screening. Clin Invest Med 4: 227–258, 1981
Bross IDJ: Mammography (letter). Can Med Assoc J 123: 94–95, 1980
Miller AB, Howe GR, Sherman GJ, Lindsay J: The Canadian study of cancer following multiple fluoroscopies. I: Mortality from breast cancer in women, 1950–1977 (in preparation, 1983)
Land CE, Boice JD, Shore RE, Norman JE, Tokunaga M: Breast cancer risk from low-dose exposures to ionizing radiation: results of parallel analysis of three exposed populations of women. J Natl Cancer Inst 65: 353–376, 1980
Moolgavkar SH, Knudson AG: Mutation and cancer: a model for human carcinogenesis. J Natl Cancer Inst 66: 1037–1052, 1981
Kobayashi T: Ultrasonic detection of breast cancer. Clin Obstet Gynecol 25: 409–423, 1982
Yu SZ, Miller AB, Sherman GJ: Optimizing the age, number of tests, and test interval for cervical screening in Canada. J Epid Commun Health 36: 1–10, 1982
Miller AB: Controversies in screening for breast cancer.In R Margolese (ed): Contemporary Issues in Clinical Oncology: Breast Cancer. Churchill-Livingstone, New York (in press, 1983)
Miller AB: Present status of breast cancer screening. Can Med Assoc J 117: 845–846, 1977
Miller AB, Bulbrook RD: Screening, detection, and diagnosis of breast cancer. Lancet 1: 1109–1111, 1982
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Address for reprints: Dr A.B. Miller, NCIC Epidemiology Unit, Faculty of Medicine, 3rd Floor McMurrich Building, 12 Queen's Park Cres. West, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 1A8, Canada.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, A.B., Chir, B. Screening for breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Tr 3, 143–156 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01803557
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01803557