Summary
Some case studies in elementary particle physics are presented in this work, that can be used for the critical appraisal of specific criteria which were proposed to account for the development of Heisenberg's work. It is attempted to define the philosophical problems associated with and emerging from the structures of theories, rather than analyse the philosophical aspects of concepts used in elementary particle physics. This necessitates the discussion of the relationship between theory and experiment, and the role of the mathematical framework being used. The question of elementarity is studied in this connection. Popper's tetradic schema and his concept of world three are modified, and it is shown that the new schema can accommodate the development of certain research programs in a much more satisfactory manner. As a result of the systematic treatment of specific research programs, the principle of contextual re-interpretation is expanded by specifying the different kinds of interpretations at the various stages of development of theories. It is also shown that principles such as those of simplicity and beauty can be understood in terms of the mathematical structure of the theories, and their methodological importance is emphasized.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Literatur
P. Heelan, “Heisenberg and Radical Theoretical Change” Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie, VI, 113–137, 1975.
L. Althousser,For Marx (Vintage Press, New York, 1970).
M. E. Omel'yanovkii, “The Problem of Elementarity of Particles in Quantum Theory” p. 44 inPhilosophical Problems of Elementary Particle Physics ed. K. Kuznetsov (Daniel Davy Co., New York 1965).
B. d'Espagnat, Phys. Rev.D 11, 1429–35, 1975.
A. Einstein, “Autobiographical Notes” inEinstein; Philosopher-Scientist ed. A. Schilpp (Open Court Library, Illinois, 1973).
Ref. 4, p. 1434.
A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen Phys. Rev.47, 777, 1935.
J. C. Bell Physics1, 195, 1964.
S. J. Freeman, J. F. Clauder Phys. Rev. Letters28, 938, 1972.
Physicist's Conception of Nature, ed. J. Mehra, (Reide, Mass., 1974) article by d'Espagnat “Quantum Logic and Non-separability” p. 734.
J. C. Maxwell,Collected Scientific Papaers, ed. W. D. Niven (Dover, New York, 1965) article titled “On Faraday's Lines of Force”.
A good discussion of these experiments can be found inElementary Particle Physics by S. Gasoirowicz, (Wiley, New York 1966). See alsoPhysics in the Twentieth Century by V. Weiskopf (MIT Press, Mass., 1972).
T. D. Lee, C. N. Yang Phys. Rev.104, 254–58, 1956.
Ibid. p. 254.
K. R. Popper,Objective Knowledge (Oxford University Press, New York, 1972).
Ibid. p. 287.
Ibid. chapter 4.
Ibid. p. 118.
K. R. Popper inThe Philosophy of Karl Popper ed. by A. Schilpp (Open Court Library, Illinois, 1974).
Information about this theory can be found inGravitation by C. Misner, K. Thorpe, J. A. Wheeler (Freeman, Los Angeles, 1974).
The most important original papers contributing to the early development of the weak interaction theory have been collected by P. K. Kabir inThe Development of Weak Interaction Theory (Gordon and Breach, New York, 1965).
L. Wolfenstein Phys. Review Letters13, 562, 1964.
E. Houtapel, P. Van Dam, E. Wigner, Rev. of Mod. Phys.37, 595, 1965.
J. J. Sakurai,Invariance Principles and Elementary Particles (Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, 1966).
T. D. Lee, Oxford Conference on Elementary Particles, Proceedings (Rutherford High Energy Lab., England, 1966).
Ref. 10, article by P. A. M. Dirac titled “Development of the Physicists's Conception of Nature”.
Ibid. p. 15.
Ref. 3 article by I. B. Novik, “Visualizability and Models in the theory of Elementary Particles” p. 232.
Article titled “Space-Time Quantization in Elementary Particle Theory” by I. S. in ref. 3, p. 118. H. R. Coish Phys. Rev.114, 383, 1959.
Ref. 28, p. 249.
Other examples can be found in ref. 28.
The original program has been published in Prog. Theor. Phys.6, 581, 1951. Other references as well as some points concerning our further elaboration of the principle of contextual re-interpretation can be found in Suppl. Prog. Theor. Phys. no. 50, 1971.
T. D. Lee, Lecture given at Brookhaven National Labs. May 1970. See also D. Bainil, Reps. on Progress in Physics34, 491, 1971.
K. Gavroglu, Nuovo Cimento16A, 61., 1973. K. Gavroglu, H. Gottlieb, Nuclear PhysicsB79, 168, 1974.
R. P. Feynman, Proceedings of the International Conference on Elementary Particles, Aix-en-Provence 1961, p. 205.
W. Heisenberg et al., Z. Naturforsch.14a, 441, 1951.
Ref. 10, article by J. A. Wheeler titled “From Relativity to Mutability” p. 243.
An excellent discussion of these points can be found in J. SchwingerParticles and Sources (Addison-Wesley, Mass., 1970).
An interesting article concerning these points is “Problems of Empiricism II” by P. Feyerabend inFunction of Scientific Theories ed. R. Colodny (Pittsburg Univ. Press, Pittsburg, 1970).
D. I. Mendeleev, selection of quotations from “From Mendeleev's Atom to the collapsing star” by J. A. Wheeler Trans. New York Acad. Sci.33, 761, 1971.
P. Heelan, “Complementarity, Context-Dependence and Quantum Logic” Foundations of Physics1, 95, 1970.
K. R. Popper,The Logic of Scientific Discovery chapter VII, (Hutchinson, London, 1959).
S. Fubini, Proceedings of London Conference on Elementary Particles, p. VI-13 (Rutherford Labs., England, 1975).
A thorough discussion can be found in W. PauliNiels Bohr and the Development of Physics (Pergamon, London, 1955).
See ref. 24.
H. Faissner et al., Aachen preprint PITHA-1971-44, J. Hsu, Phys. Rev.D5, 981, 1972.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gavroglu, K. Research guiding principles in modern physics: Case studies in elementary particle physics. Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 7, 223–248 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800764
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01800764