Skip to main content
Log in

Quinolone resistance inPseudomonas aeruginosa andStaphylococcus aureus. Development during therapy and clinical significance

Chinolonresistenz beiPseudomonas aeruginosa undStaphylococcus aureus: Entwicklung während der Therapie und klinische Bedeutung

  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This review focuses on published information on the experimental as well as clinical data on the emergence of quinolone resistant isolates. In the course of clinical use of fluoroquinolones, only a sporadic emergence of quinolone resistance has been noted. The resistant organisms emerged particularly in certain clinical settings where large numbers of organisms frequently causing chronic infections are present and/or in loci where quinolone concentrations may not be optimal. In terms of occurrence in individuals, quinolone resistance has emerged most frequently in hospitalized and nursing-home patients with identifiable risk factors. Epidemiological studies revealed that in nearly all the cases studied one or one predominating quinolone resistant clone was selected that was horizontally transmitted. Thus, the emergence of quinolone resistance is not due to an independent selection of resistant strains in a number of patients, but to the clonal spread of one strain once it has acquired quinolone resistance. Therefore, the rate of quinolone resistance is very likely to be lower than reported.

Zusammenfassung

Die publizierten präklinischen sowie klinischen Daten zur Chinolonresistenz sind synoptisch dargestellt. Im Verlauf der klinischen Anwendung von Fluorochinolonen wurde bislang nur sporadisch das Auftreten Chinolon-resistenter Stämme beobachtet. Diese resistenten Stämme traten vor allem unter solchen klinischen Bedingungen auf, unter denen entweder hohe Bakterienzellzahlen chronische Infektionen verursachen und/oder in solchen Infektlokalisationen, in denen die Chinolonkonzentrationen nicht optimal sein können. Bezogen auf die individuelle Wahrscheinlichkeit des Auftretens Chinolon-resistenter Stämme treten diese vorrangig in hospitalisierten Patienten oder Pflegeheimbewohnern mit identifizierbaren Risikofaktoren auf. Epidemiologische Studien ergaben, daß in nahezu allen untersuchten Fällen ein oder ein vorherrschender Chinolon-resistenter Klon selektiert worden war, der sich anschließend horizontal ausbreitete. Somit ist das Auftreten einer Chinolonresistenz nicht auf eine unabhängige Selektion einer Vielzahl resistenter Stämme in entsprechend vielen Patienten zurück-zuführen, sondern vielmehr auf eine klonale Ausbreitung eines einzigen Stammes sobald dieser eine Chinolonresistenz erworben hat. Folglich ist die Rate der Chinolonresistenz sehr wahrscheinlich geringer als publiziert.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kresken, M., Wiedemann, B. Development of resistance to nalidixic acid and the fluoroquinolones after the introduction of norfloxacin and ofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 1285–1288.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wiedemann, B., Zühlsdorf, M. T. Brief report: resistance development to fluoroquinolones in Europe. Am. J. Med. 87 (Suppl. 5A) (1989) 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kresken, M., Hafner, D., Mittermayer, H., Verbist, L., Bergogne-Bérézin, E., Giamarellou, N., Esposito, S., Van Klingeren, B., Kayser, F. N., Reeves, D. and Study Group of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, European Study Group ‘Bacterial Resistance’: Prevalence of antibiotic resistance in Europe, 1990. 6th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, March 1993, Seville, Abstract No. 308.

  4. Kresken, M., Haftner, D. and Study Group of the Paul Ehrlich Society for Chemotherapy, European Study Group ‘Bacterial Resistance’: Development of resistance to fluoroquinolones between 1983 and 1990 in central Europe. 6th European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, March 1993, Seville, Abstract No. 1046.

  5. Focht, J., Kraus, H., Nosner, K.: Comparativein vitro activity of ofloxacin and other antimicrobial agents used in oral therapy in general practice during the years 1985–1991. 4th International Symposium on New Quinolones, Munich, August 1992, Abstract No. 7.

  6. Grimm, H.: Resistance trend of ofloxacin and ciprofloxacin: monitoring of more than 300,000 strains in the last 5 years. 3rd Int.Symp. New Quinolones, Vancouver, July 1990, Abstract No. 94.

  7. Tillotson, G. S., Culshaw, K. D., O'Keefe, B. J. O.: Longitudinal survey of ciprofloxacin susceptibility in the UK: 5 years' experience. 4th International Symposium on New Quinolones, Munich, August 1992, Abstract No. 10.

  8. Wolff, M., Buré, A., Pathé, J. P., Pangon, B., Regnier, B., Rouger-Barbier, D., Vachon, F. Evolution des résistances bactériennes à la péfloxacin dans le service de réanimation de l'hôpital Claude-Bernard. In:Pocidalo, J. J., Vachon, F., Regnier, B. (eds): Les nouvelles quinolones. Paris, Editions Arnette 1985, pp. 213–226.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Acar, J. F., Francoual, S. The clinical problems of bacterial resistance to the new quinolones. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26 (Suppl. B) (1990) 207–213.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wadsworth, S. J., Kim, Ki-Ho., Satischandran, V., Axelrod, P., Truant, A. L., Suh, B. Development of new antibiotic resistance in methicillin-resistant but not methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30 (1992) 821–826.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schuster, F. X., Holzmann, R. M., Schmidbauer, G. P., Porpaczy, P.: Comparativein vitro activity of ofloxacin and other orally absorbed antimicrobial agents against more than 7,000 urinary tract bacterial pathogens. Eur. Congr. Clin. Microbiol., Nice 1989, Abstract No. 2.

  12. Shalit, I., Haas, H., Berger, S. A. Susceptibility ofPseudomonas aeruginosa to fluoroquinolones following 4 years of use in a tertiary care hospital. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30 (1992) 149–152.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Fernandez, P. B., Hanson, C. W., Stamm, J. M., Vojtko, C., Shipkowitz, N. L., Martin, E. St. The frequency ofin vitro resistance development to fluoroquinolones and the use of murine pyelonephritis model to demonstrate selection of resistancein vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 19 (1987) 449–465.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Michéa-Hamzehpour, M., Auckenthaler, R., Regamey, P., Pechère, J. C. Resistance occurring after fluoroquinolone therapy of experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa peritonitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 1803–1808.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bayer, A. S., Hirano, L., Yin, J. Development of β-lactam resistance and increased quinolone MICs during therapy of experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 231–235.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Bayer, A. S., Blomquist, J. K., Kim, K. S. Ciprofloxacin in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due toPseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 17 (1986) 641–649.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Chamberland, S., Bayer, A. S., Schollardt, T., Wong, S. A., Bryan, L. E. Characterization of mechanisms of quinolone resistance inPseudomonas aeruginosa strains isolatedin vitro andin vivo during experimental endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 624–634.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gordin, F. M., Hackbarth, C. J., Scott, K. G., Sande, M. A. Activities of pefloxacin and ciprofloxacin in experimentally inducedPseudomonas aeruginosa in neutropenic guinea pigs. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 27 (1985) 452–454.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Scribner, R. K., Welche, D. F., Marks, M. J. Low frequency of bacterial resistance to enoxacinin vitro and in experimental pneumonia. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 16 (1985) 597–603.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kemmrich, B., Small, G. J., Pennington, J. E. Comparative evaluation of ciprofloxacin, enoxacin and ofloxacin in experimentalPseudomonas aeruginosa pneumonia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 29 (1986) 395–399.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bamberger, D. M., Peterson, L. R., Gerding, D. N., Fasching, C. E. Ciprofloxacin, azlocillin, ceftizoxime, and amikacin alone and in combination against gram-negative bacilli in an infected chamber model. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (1986) 51–63.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Norden, C. W., Shinner, E. Ciprofloxacin as therapy for experimental osteomyelitis caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa. J. Infect. Dis. 151 (1985) 291–294.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dworkin, R., Modin, G., Kunz, S., Rich, R., Zak, O., Sande, M. Comparative efficacies of ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin and vancomycin in combination with rifampicin in a rat model of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus chronic osteomyelitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34 (1990) 1014–1016.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Henry, N. K., Rouse, M. S., Whitesell, A. L., McConnell, M. E., Wilson, W. Treatment of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus experimental osteomyelitis with ciprofloxacin or vancomycin alone or in combination with rifampin. Am. J. Med. 82 (Suppl. 4A) (1987) 73–75.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lucain, C., Regamy, C., Bellido, F., Pechère, J. C. Resistance emerging after pefloxacin therapy of experimentalEnterobacter cloacae peritonitis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 937–943.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roosendaal, R., Bakker-Woudenberg, I. A. J. M., van den Berghevan Raffe, M., van den Berg, J. C. V., Michel, M. F. Comparative studies of ciprofloxacin und ceftazidime againstKlebsiella pneumoniae in vitro and in experimental pneumonia in leukopenic rats. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (Suppl. 11) (1987) 1809–1815.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Thauvin, C. L., Lecomte, F., Le Boete, I., Grise, G., Lemeland, J. F. Efficacy of ciprofloxacin alone and in combination with azlocillin in experimental endocarditis due toPseudomonas aeruginosa. Infection 17 (Suppl. 1) (1989) 31–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kaatz, G. W., Barriere, S. L., Schaberg, D. R., Fekety, R. The emergence of resistance to ciprofloxacin during treatment of experimentalStaphylococcus endocarditis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 20 (1987) 753–758.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaatz, G. W., Seo, S. M., Ruble, C. A. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance inStaphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 163 (1991) 1080–1086.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Kaatz, G. W., Barriere, S. L., Schaberg, D. R., Fekety, R. Ciprofloxacin versus vancomycin in the therapy of experimental methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 527–530.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernandez-Guerrero, M., Rouse, M., Henry, N., Wilson, W. Ciprofloxacin therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-susceptible or methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 747–751.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaatz, G. W., Seo, S. M., Barriere, S. L., Albrecht, L. M., Rybak, M. J. Development of resistance to fleroxacin during therapy of experimental methicillin-susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus endocarditis. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 (1991) 1547–1550.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Thauvin, C., Lemeland, J. F., Humbert, G., Fillastre, J. P. Efficacy of pefloxacin-fosfomycin in experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 32 (1988) 919–921.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Davey, P., Barza, M., Stuart, M. Tolerance ofPseudomonas aeruginosa to killing by ciprofloxacin, gentamicin and imipenemin vitro andin vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 21 (1988) 395–404.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Kaatz, G. W., Seo, S. M., Ruble, C. A. Mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resistance inStaphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 163 (1991) 1080–1086.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Schacht, P., Arcieri, G., Branolte, J., Bruck, H., Chysky, V., Griffith, E., Gruenwaldt, G., Hullmann, R., Konopka, C. A., O'Brien, B., Rahm, V., Ryoki, T., Westwood, A., Weuta, H. Worldwide clinical data on efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin. Infection 16 (Suppl. 1) (1988) 29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ball, P. Emergent resistance to ciprofloxacin amongstPseudomonas aeruginosa andStaphylococcus aureus: clinical significance and therapeutic approaches. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26 (Suppl F.) (1990) 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Guibert, J. M., Distree, D. M., Acar, J. F. Ciprofloxacin (Bay 0 9867): clinical evaluation in urinary tract infections due toPseudomonas aeruginosa. Chemioterapia 6 (Suppl 2) (1987) 524–525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Scully, B. E., Neu, H. C., Parry, M. F., Mandell, W. Oral ciprofloxacin therapy of infections due toPseudomonas aeruginosa. Lancet i (1986) 819–822.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Van Poppel, H., Wegge, M., Dammekens, H., Chysky, V. Oral treatment ofPseudomonas induced urinary tract infections with ciprofloxacin. Chemotherapy 32 (1986) 83–87.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Brown, E. M., Morris, R., Stephenson, T. P. The efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin in the treatment of chronicPseudomonas aeruginosa urinary tract infection. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (Suppl D) (1986) 123–127.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Leigh, D. A., Emmanuel, F. X. S., Petch, K. J. Ciprofloxacin therapy in complicated urinary tract infections caused byPseudomonas aeruginosa and other resistant bacteria. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 18 (Suppl D) (1986) 117–121.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Dalhoff, A. Clinical perspectives of quinolone resistance inPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antibiotic Chemother. Basel 44 (1991) 221–239.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lesse, A. J., Freer, C., Salate, P. A., Francis, J.-B., Scheld, W. M. Oral ciprofloxacin therapy for gram-negative bacillary osteomyelitis. Am. J. Med. 82 (Suppl 4A) (1987) 247–253.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Gilbert, D. N., Tice, A. D., Marsh, P. K., Craven, P. C., Preheim, L. C. Oral ciprofloxacin therapy for chronic contiguous osteomyelitis caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Am. J. Med. 82 (Suppl 1) (1987) 254–258.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Slama, T. G., Misinski, J., Sklar, S. Oral ciprofloxacin for osteomyelitis caused by aerobic gram-negative bacilli. Am. J. Med. 82 (Suppl 4A) (1987) 259–261.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Trexler-Hessen, M., Ingerman, M. J., Kaufman, D. H., Weiner, P., Santoro, J., Korzeniowski, O. M., Boscia, J., Topiel, M., Bush, L. M., Kaye, D., Levison, M. E. Clinical efficacy of ciprofloxacin therapy for gram-negative bacillary osteomyelitis. Am. J. Med. 82 (Suppl 4A) (1987) 262–265.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Daikos, G. L., Lolans, V. T., Jackson, G. G. Alterations in outer membrane proteins ofPseudomonas aeruginosa associated with selective resistance to quinolones. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32 (1988) 785–787.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Piddock, L. J. V., Wijnands, W. J. A., Wise, R. Quinolone/ureidopenicillin cross-resistance. Lancet i (1987) 907.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Piddock, L. J. V., Hall, M. C., Bellido, F., Bains, M., Hancock, R. E. W. A pleiotropic, posttherapy, enoxacin-resistant mutant ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36 (1992) 1057–1061.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Cherubin, C. E. Activity of amoxycillin clavulanic acid againstEscherichia coli in vivo. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 30 (1992) 229–242.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Chin, N. Y., Clynes, N., Neu, H. C. Resistance to ciprofloxacin appearing during chemotherapy. Am. J. Med. 87 (Suppl 5A) (1989) 285–315.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Diver, J. M., Scholaardt, T., Rabin, H. R., Thorson, C., Bryan, L. E. Persistence mechanisms inPseudomonas aeruginosa from cystic fibrosis patients undergoing ciprofloxacin therapy. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 (1991) 1538–1546.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Masecar, B. L., Celesk, R. A., Robillard, N. J. Analysis of acquired ciprofloxacin resistance in a clinical strain ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34 (1990) 281–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Hirai, K. I., Suzue, S., Irikua, S., Iyobe, S., Mitsuhashi, S. Mutations producing resistance to norfloxacin inPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1987) 582–586.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Jakics, E. V., Iyobe, S., Hirai, K., Fukuda, H., Hashimoto, H. Occurrence of the nfxB type mutation in clinical isolates ofPseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36 (1992) 2562–2565.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Chamberland, S., Malouin, F., Rabin, W. R., Schollardt, T., Parr, T. R., Bryan, L. E. Persistence ofPseudomonas aeruginosa during ciprofloxacin therapy of a cystic fibrosis patient: transient resistance to quinolones and protein F deficiency. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 25 (1990) 995–1010.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Gotoh, N., Wakebe, H., Yoshihara, E., Nakae, T., Nishino, T. Role of protein F in maintaining structural integrity ofPseudomonas aeruginosa outer menbrane. J. Bacteriol. 171 (1989) 983–990.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Neu, H. C. Bacterial resistance to fluoroquinolones. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10 (Suppl. 1) (1989) 57–63.

    Google Scholar 

  60. LeBel, M. Fluoroquinolones in the treatment of cystic fibrosis: a critical appraisal. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 10 (1991) 316–324.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Ogle, J. W., Reller, L. B., Vasil, M. L. Development of resistance inPseudomonas aeruginosa to imipenem, norfloxacin and ciprofloxacin during therapy: proof provided by typing with a DNA probe. J. Infect. Dis. 157 (1988) 743–748.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Döring, G., Hörz, M., Ortelt, J., Rössle, R., Wolz, C. Molecular epidemiology ofPseudomonas aeruginosa in an intensive therapy unit. Epidemiol. Infect. 110 (1993) 427–436.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Worlitzsch, D., Wolz, C., Botzenhart, K., Hansis, M., Burgdorfer, H., Ogle, J. W., Döring, G. Molecular epidemiology ofPseudomonas aeruginosa — urinary tract infections in paraplegic patients. Zbl. Hyg. 189 (1989) 175–184.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Naber, K. G., Witte, W., Bauernfeind, A., Wiedemann, B., Grimm, H. Resistenzentwicklung gegenüber Fluorochinolonen. Chemotherapie J. 2 (1993) 106–111.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. Methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. N. Engl. J. Med. 320 (1989) 1188–1196.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Aboukasm, A. G., Buu-Hoi, A. Y., el Solh, N., Morvan, A., Acar, J. F. Epidemiological study ofStaphylococcus aureus resistance to new quinolones in a university hospital. J. Hosp. Infect. 17 (1990) 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Humphreys, H., Mulvihill, E. Ciprofloxacin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Lancet 17 (1985) 383.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Milne, L. M., Faiers, M. C. Ciprofloxacin resistance in epidemic methicillin-resistantStaphylococcocus aureus. Lancet 8 (1988) 843.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Mulligan, M. E., Ruane, L., Johnston, L., Wong, P., Wheelock, J. P., MacDonald, K., Reinhardt, J.-F., Johnson, C. C., Statner, B., Blomquist, I., McCarthy, J., O'Brien, W., Gardner, S., Hammer, L., Citron, D. Ciprofloxacin for eradication of methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus colonization. Am. J. Med. 82 (1987) 215–219.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Valtonen, V., Karppinen, L., Kariniecni, A. L. A comparative study of ciprofloxacin and conventional therapy in the treatment of patients with chronic lower leg ulcers infected withPseudomonas aeruginosa and other gram-negative rods. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. (Suppl. 60) (1989) 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Weightman, N. C., Brass, A. S. Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin sensitiveStaphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 31 (1993) 179–180.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Kotilainen, P., Nikoskelainen, J., Huovinen, P. Emergence of ciprofloxacin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococcal skin flora in immunocompromised patients receiving ciprofloxacin. J. Infect. Dis. 161 (1990) 41–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Oppenheim, B. A., Hartley, J. W., Lee, W., Burnie, J. P. Outbreak of coagulase-negativeStaphylococcus highly resistant to ciprofloxacin in a leukaemia unit. Br. Med. J. 299 (1989) 294–297.

    Google Scholar 

  74. Piercy, E. A., Barbaro, D., Luby, J. P., Mackowiak, P. A. Ciprofloxacin for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 128–130.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Smith, S. M., Eng, R. H. K., Bais, P., Fan-Havard, P., Teeson-Tumang, F. Epidemiology of ciprofloxacin resistance among patients with methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 26 (1990) 567–572.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Schaefler, S. Methicillin-resistant strains ofStaphylococcus aureus resistant to quinolones. J. Clin. Microbiol. 27 (1989) 335–336.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Budnick, L. D., Schaefler, S. Ciprofloxacin-resistant methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in New York health care facilities, 1988. Am. J. Pub. Health 80 (1990) 810–813.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Peterson, L. R., Quick, J. N., Jensen, B., Homan, S. Johnson, S., Tenquist, J., Shanholtzer, C. Petzel, R. A., Sinn, L., Gerding, D. N. Emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance in nosocomial methicillin resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolates. Arch. Intern. Med. 150 (1990) 2151–2155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Shalit, I., Berger, S. A., Gorea, A., Frimerman, H. Widespread quinolone resistance among methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus isolates in a general hospital. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 33 (1989) 593–594.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Hadorn, K., Lenz, W., Kayser, F. H., Shalit, I., Krasemann, C. Use of a ribosomal RNA gene probe for the epidemiological study of methicillin and ciprofloxacin resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 9 (1990) 649–653.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Blumberg, H. M., Rimland, D., Carroll, D. J., Terry, P., Wachsmuth, I. K. Rapid development of ciprofloxacin resistance in methicillin-susceptible and -resistantStaphylococcus aureus. J. Infect. Dis. 163 (1991) 1279–1285.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Blumberg, H. M., Rimland, D., Kiehlbauch, J. A., Terry, P. M., Wachsmuth, I. K. Epidemiologic typing ofStaphylococcus aureus by DNA restriction fragment length polymorphisms of rRNA genes, elucidation of the clonal nature of a group of bacteriophage-nontypeable, ciprofloxacin-resistant, methicillin-susceptibleS. aureus isolates. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30 (1992) 362–369.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Etienne, J., Brun, Y., Billard, M., Fleurette, J. Hospital dispersion ofStaphylococcus epidermidis isolates resistant to a fluoroquinolone, pefloxacin. Epidemiol. Infect. 103 (1989) 459–464.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Harnett, N., Brown, S., Krishnan, C. Emergence of quinolone resistance among clinical isolates of methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus in Ontario, Canada. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 35 (1991) 1911–1913.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  85. Daum, T. E., Schaberg, D. R., Terpenning, M. S., Sottile, W. S., Kauffman, C. A. Increasing resistance ofStaphylococcus aureus to ciprofloxacin. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34 (1990) 1862–1863.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Goetz, M. B., Mulligan, M. E., Kwok, R., O'Brien, H., Caballes, C., Garcia, J. P. Management and epidemiologic analysis of an outbreak due to methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus. Am. J. Med. 92 (1992) 607–614.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dalhoff, A. Quinolone resistance inPseudomonas aeruginosa andStaphylococcus aureus. Development during therapy and clinical significance. Infection 22 (Suppl 2), S111–S121 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01793575

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01793575

Keywords

Navigation