Abstract
The use of quantile criteria in two-person matrix games is explored: maximizing the confidence of a fixed payoff level or maximizing the payoff level for a given confidence level.
We define a series of payoff levels, and indicate lower and upper bounds on their confidences, as a generalization of the maximum security level.
Also the existence of a finite spectrum (to be calculated with L.P.) of optimal quantile strategies is demonstrated. Such a spectrum allows a direct trade-off between payoff and risk and therefore eliminates the impractical need of a utility function.
Only a preference ranking of outcomes is required for the analysis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cassidy, R. G., C. A. Fields andM. J. L. Kirby: Solution of a Satisficing Model for Random Payoff Games, Management Science,19, No. 3, 266–271, 1972.
Luce, R. D., andH. Raiffa: Games and Decisions, John Wiley and Sons, New York 1957.
Walsh, J. E.: Discrete Two Person Game Theory with Median Payoff Criterion, Opsearch6, 83–97, 1969 and see Errata Opsearch6, 216, 1969.
—: Median Two-Person Game Theory for Median Competitive Games, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan12, No. 1, 11–20, 1969.
—: Generally Applicable Solutions for Two-Person Median Game Theory, Journal of the Operations Research Society of Japan,13, 1–5, 1970.
-: Generally Applicablen-Person Percentile Game Theory for Case of Independently Chosen Strategies, Tech. rep. No. 92, Dept. of Statistics, Southern Methodist University, 1970.
—: Description of Median Game Theory with Examples of Competitive and Median Competitive Games, Revue de Statistique — Tijdschrift voor Statistiek10(4), 2–13, 1971.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
de Vries, H. Quantile criteria for the selection of strategies in game theory. Int J Game Theory 3, 105–114 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01766396
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01766396