Abstract
Given two side-payment gamesv andw, both defined for the same finite player-setN, the following three welfare criteria are characterized in terms of the datav andw: (A) For everyy ∃ C(w) there existsx ∃ C(v) such thaty≤x; (A′) For everyx∃C(v) there existsyεC(w) such thaty≤x; and (B) There existyεC(w) andxεC(v) such thaty≤x. (HereC(v) denotes the core ofv.) Given two non-side-payment gamesv andw, sufficient conditions for the criteria (A′) and (B) are established, by observing that an ordinal convex game has a large core.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alchian AA, Demsetz H (1972) Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review 62: 777–795
Alkan A, Demange G, and Gale D (1988) Fair allocation of indivisible goods and money. Working Paper No. PAM-421, Center for Pure and Applied Mathematics, University of California, Berkeley, August
Arrow KJ (1974) The limits of organization. Norton. New York
Bondareva ON (1962) Teoriia iadra v igre n lits. Vestnik Leningrad Univ. Math 13: 141–142
Coase RH (1937) The nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405
Delbaen F (1974) Convex games and extreme points. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 45: 210–233
Fan K (1956) On systems of linear inequalities. In Kuhn HW and Tucker AW (eds) Linear inequalities and related systems, pp. 99–156. Princeton University Press. Princeton
Ichiishi T (1981) Super-modularity: Applications to convex games and to the greedy algorithm for LP. Journal of Economic Theory 25: 283–286
Ichiishi T (1982) Management versus ownership, I. International Economic Review 23: 323–336
Ichiishi T (1983) Game theory for economic analysis. Academic Press. New York
Ichiishi T (1985) Management versus ownership, II. European Economic Review 27: 115–138
Ichiishi T (1987a) A note on welfare comparison of two side-payment games. CORE Discussion Paper No. 8741, CORE, Université Catholique de Louvain, August
Ichiishi (T) (1987b) Weak dominance of cores. Working Paper No. 87-05, Department of Economics, The Ohio State University, August
Mo, J-P (1988) Entry and structures of interest groups in assignment games. Journal of Economic Theory 46: 66–96
Peleg B (1982) Convex effectivity functions. Research Memorandum No. 46, Center for Research in Mathematical Economics and Game Theory, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, April
Peleg B (1986) A proof that the core of an ordinal convex game is a von Neumann-Morgenstern solution. Mathematical Social Sciences 11: 83–87
Rosenmüller J (1971) On core and value. Operations Research Verfahren 9: 84–101
Schmeidler D (1967) On balanced games with infinitely many players, Research Program in Game Theory and Mathematical Economics, Research Memorandum No. 28, Department of Mathematics, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Schmeidler D (1972) Cores of exact games, I. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 40: 214–225
Scotchmer S, Wooders MH (1988) Monotonicity in games that exhaust gains to scale. mimeo, March
Sertel MR (1982) Workers and incentives. North-Holland. Amsterdam
Shapley LS (1967) On balanced sets and cores. Naval Research Logistics Quarterly 14: 453–460
Shapley LS (1971) Cores of convex games. International Journal of Game Theory 1: 11–26
Sharkey WW (1982) Cooperative games with large cores. International Journal of Game Theory 11: 175–182
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
In memory of my teacher in Japan, Professor Ryuichi Watanabe, 1928–1986.
A substantially revised version of Ichiishi (1987a). A part of this paper was written during the author's visit to CORE in early June 1987. The hospitality and the financial support of CORE as well as support from the Ohio State University are gratefully acknowledged. The author thanks Van Kolpin, Jean-FranÇois Mertens, Shmuel Zamir and two anonymous referees for their comments and suggestions on the earlier versions. Any possible deficiency in this paper is the author's responsibility.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ichiishi, T. Comparative cooperative game theory. Int J Game Theory 19, 139–152 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01761073
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01761073