Skip to main content
Log in

Arbitration of two-party disputes under ignorance

  • Papers
  • Published:
International Journal of Game Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

When an arbitrator lacks complete information about the dispute in question, he may have to turn to the disputants themselves to provide information. If they know how the information is to be used, they may have incentives to hide the truth. By using the players reports as checks on each other, a completely ignorant arbitrator of a dispute between two completely informed players can induce truthful revelation in the sense that the truth is a Nash equilibrium of the game which the arbitrator's decision process imposes on the players. Such a scheme may be used in conjunction with any one from a class of functions which select Pareto-optimal, individually-rational outcomes in two-person normal-form games.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Groves, T., andJ. Ledyard: Optimal Allocation of Public Goods: A Solution to the ‘Free Rider’ Problem. Econometrica45, 1977, 783–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, T., andM. Loeb: Reflections on ‘Social Costs and Benefits and the Transfer Pricing Problem. Journal of Public Economics5, 1976, 353–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.: Approaches to the Bargaining Problem Before and After the Theory of Games: A Critical Discussion of Zeuthen's, Hicks', and Nash's Theories. Econometrica24, 1956, 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J., andR. Selten: A Generalized Nash Solution for Two-Person Bargaining Games with Incomplete Information. Management Science18, 1972, P80-P106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E.: Proportional Solutions to Bargaining Situations. Econometrica45, 1977, 1623–1630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalai, E., andM. Smorodinsky: Other Solutions to Nash's Bargaining Problem. Econometrica43, 1975, 513–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, D., andH. Raiffa: Games and Decisions. New York 1957, Chapter 6.

  • Nash, J.: The Bargaining Problem. Econometrica18, 1950, 155–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • —: Two-Person Cooperative Games. Econometrica21, 1953, 128–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G.: Game Theory. Philadelphia 1968, Chapter 7.

  • Raiffa, H.: Arbitration Schemes for Generalized Two-Person Games. Annals of Mathematics Studies 28, ed. by Kuhn and Tucker. Princeton 1953, 361–387.

  • Rosenthal, R.: An Arbitration Model for Normal-Form Games. Mathematics of Operations Research1, 1976, 83–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, T.: The Strategy of Conflict. London 1960.

  • Smith, V.: Mechanisms for the Optimal Provision of Public Goods. Technical Report, Department of Economics, University of Arizona.

  • Zeuthen, F.: Problems of Monopoly and Economic Warface. London 1930.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Research supported by Nat. Sc. Found. Grant No. SOC-7401790.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kalai, E., Rosenthal, R.W. Arbitration of two-party disputes under ignorance. Int J Game Theory 7, 65–72 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01753235

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01753235

Keywords

Navigation