Abstract
In new, iterative continuum-based optimality criteria (COC) methods, the strain in the adjoint structure becomes non-unique if the number of active local constraints is greater than the number of design variables for an element. This brief note discusses the use of smooth envelope functions (SEF's) in overcoming economically computational problems caused by the above non-uniqueness.
References
Berke, L.; Khot, N.S. 1987: Structural optimization using optimality criteria. In: Mota Soares, C.A. (ed.)Computer aided optimal design: structural and mechanical systems, pp. 271–312. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
Chang, K.J. 1992: Optimality criteria methods using K-S functions.Struct. Optim. 4, 213–217
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Zhou, M.; Gollub, W.;et al. 1989/1990: Continuum-type optimality criteria methods for large finite element systems with a displacement constraint. Parts I, II.Struct. Optim. 1, 47–72,2, 77–104
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Zhou, M. 1991a: The COC algorithm, Part I: cross-section optimization or sizing.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 89, 281–308
Rozvany, G.I.N.; Zhou, M. 1991b: A note on truss design for stress and displacment constraints by optimality criteria methods.Struct. Optim. 3, 45–50
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. 1992: A technique for locating function roots and for satisfying equality constraints in optimization.Struct. Optim. 4, 241–243.
Zhou, M.; Rozvany, G.I.N. 1992: A new discretized optimality criteria method in structural optimization.Proc. AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Dynamics and Materials Conf. (held in Dallas), pp. 3106–3120. Washington DC: AIAA
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Rozvany, G.I.N., Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, J. New optimality criteria methods: Forcing uniqueness of the adjoint strains by corner-rounding at constraint intersections. Structural Optimization 4, 244–246 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742752
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01742752