Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in the organization and chromosomal allocation of satellite DNA between the European long tailed house miceMus domesticus andMus musculus

  • Published:
Chromosoma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We compared the organization of satellite DNA (stDNA) and its chromosomal allocation inMus domesticus and inMus musculus. The two stDNAs show similar restriction fragment profiles after digestion (probed withM. domesticus stDNA) with some endonucleases of which restriction sequences are present in the 230–240 bp repetitive unit of theM. domesticus stDNA. In contrast, EcoRI digestion reveals thatM. musculus stDNA lacks most of the GAATTC restriction sites, particularly at the level of the half-monomer. The chromosome distribution of stDNA (revealed by anM. domesticus stDNA probe) shows different patterns in theM. domesticus andM. musculus karyotypes, with about 60% ofM. domesticus stDNA retained in theM. musculus genome. It is particularly noteworthy that the pericentromeric regions ofM. musculus chromosomes 1 and X are totally devoid ofM. domesticus stDNA sequences. In both groups, the differences in energy transfer between the stDNA-bound fluorochromes Hoechst 33258 and propidium iodide suggest that AT-rich repeated sequences have a much more clustered array in theM. domesticus stDNA, as if they are organized in tandem repeats longer than those ofM. musculus. Considering the data as a whole, it seems likely that the evolutionary paths of the two stDNAs diverged after the generation of the ancestral 230–240 bp stDNA repetitive unit through the amplification, in theM. domesticus genome, of a family repeat which included the EcoRI GAATTC restriction sequence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bonhomme F, Catalan J, Britton Davidian J, Chapman VM, Moriwaki K, Nevo E, Thaler L (1984) Biochemical diversity and evolution in the genus Mus. Biochem Genet 22:275–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottiroli G, Cionini PG, Docchio F, Sacchi CA (1984) In situ evaluation of the functional state of chromatin by means of Quinacrine Mustard staining and time-resolved fluorescence microscopy. Histochem J 16:223–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Bottiroli G, Croce AC, Gerzeli G, Barni S (1989) DNA double staining for a fluorescence energy transfer study of chromatin in liver cells. Cell Biophys 15:249–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Britton-Davidian J, Nadeau JH, Croset H, Thaler L (1989) Genic differentiation and origin of Robertsonian populations of the house mouse (Mus musculus domesticus Rutty). Genet Res 53:29–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown SDM, Dover GA (1980) Conservation of segmental variants of satellite DNA of Mus musculus in a related species: Mus spretus. Nature 285:47–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns J, Chan VT-W, Jonasson JA, Fleming KA, Taylor S, Mc Gee JOD (1985) Sensitive system for visualising DNA probes hybridized in situ: rapid sex determination of intact cells. J Clin Pathol 38:1085–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo G, Ginelli E, Soave C, Bernardi G (1968) Isolation and characterization of mouse and guinea pig satellite deoxyribonucleic acid. Biochemistry 7:4373–4379

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder FFB, Hsu TC (1988) Tandem fusion in the evolution of mammalian chromosomes. In: Daniel A (ed) The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements. Alan R. Liss, New York, pp 481–506

    Google Scholar 

  • Elder FFB, Lee MR (1985) The chromosomes of Sigmodon ochrognathus and S. fulviventer suggest a realignment of Sigmodon species groups. J Mammal 66:511–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Faircloug RH, Cantor CR (1978) The use of singlet-singlet energy transfer to study macromolecules assemblies. Methods Enzymol 48:347–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris SD, Sage RD, Prager EM, Ritte U, Wilson AC (1983) Mitochondrial DNA evolution in mice. Genetics 105:681–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Festing MFW, Lovell DP (1981) Domestication and development of the mouse as a laboratory animal. In: Berry RJ (ed) Biology of the house mouse. Academic Press, London, New York, pp 43–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Flam WG, McCallum M, Walker PMB (1967) The isolation of complementary strands from a mouse DNA fraction. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 57:1729–1734

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamperl R, Ehmann C, Bachmann K (1982) Genome size and heterochromatin variation in rodents. Genetica 58:199–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Gropp A, Winking H (1981) Robertsonian translocations: cytology, meiosis, segregation patterns and biological consequences of heterozygosity. In: Berry RJ (ed) Biology of the house mouse. Academic Press, London, New York, pp 141–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerz W, Altenburger W (1981) The compaction of mouse heterochromatin as studied by nuclease digestion. FEBS Lett 134:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoerz W, Zachau HG (1977) Characterization of distinct segments in mouse satellite DNA by restriction nucleases. Eur J Biochem 73:383–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu TC, Arrighi FE (1971) Distribution of constitutive heterochromatin in mammalian chromosomes. Chromosoma 34:243–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones KW (1970) Chromosomal and nuclear location of mouse satellite DNA in individual cells. Nature 255:912–915

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois RG, Carrano AV, Gray JW, Van Dilla MA (1980) Cytochemical studies of metaphase chromosomes by flow cytometry. Chromosoma 77:229–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Latt SA, Sahar E, Eisenhard ME (1979) Pairs of fluorescent dyes as probes of DNA and chromosomes. J Histochem Cytochem 27:65–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning. A laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbour Laboratory, NY, p 466

    Google Scholar 

  • Manuelidis L (1981) Consensus sequence of mouse satellite DNA indicates it is derived from base pair repeats. FEBS Lett 129:25–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall JT, Sage RD (1981) Taxonomy of the house mouse. In: Berry RJ (ed) Biology of the house mouse. Academic Press, London, New York, pp 15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayfield JE, Ellison JR (1976) The fluorescence localization of mouse satellite DNA in interphase nuclei. Chromosoma 54:27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazrimas JA, Balhorn R, Hatch FT (1979) Separation of satellite DNA chromatin and main band DNA chromatin from mouse brain. Nucleic Acids Res 7:935–946

    Google Scholar 

  • Moriwaki K, Yonekawa H, Gotoh O, Minezawa M, Winking H, Gropp A (1984) Implications of the genetic divergence between European wild mice with Robertsonian translocations from the viewpoint of mitochondrial DNA. Genet Res 43:277–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka Y (1987) Y-chromosomal DNA polymorphism in mouse inbred strains. Genet Res 50:69–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardue ML (1985) In situ hybridization. In: Hames BD, Higgins SJ (eds) Nucleic acid hybridization. IRL Press, Oxford, pp 179–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardue ML, Gall JG (1970) Chromosomal localization of mouse satellite DNA. Science 168:1356–1358

    Google Scholar 

  • Pietras DF, Bennet KL, Siracusa LD, Woodworth-Gutai M, Chapman VM, Gross KW, Kane-Haas C, Hastie ND (1983) Construction of a small Mus musculus repetitive DNA library: identification of a new satellite sequence in Mus musculus. Nucleic Acids Res 11:6965–6983

    Google Scholar 

  • Redi CA, Capanna E (1988) Robertsonian heterozygotes in the house mouse and the fate of their germ cells. In: Daniel A (ed) The cytogenetics of mammalian autosomal rearrangements. Alan R Liss, New York, pp 315–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Redi CA, Garagna S, Mazzini G, Winking H (1986) Pericentromeric heterochromatin and A—T contents during Robertsonian fusion in the house mouse. Chromosoma 94:31–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed Rice N, Straus NA (1973) Relatedness of mouse satellite deoxyribonucleic acid to deoxyribonucleic acid of various Mus species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3546–3550

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiller PW (1975) The measurement of intramolecular distances by energy transfer. In: Chen RF, Edelhoch H (eds) Biochemical fluorescence: Concepts. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 285–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidtke J, Brennecke H, Schmid M, Neitzel H, Sperling K (1981) Evolution of muntjac DNA. Chromosoma 84:187–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK, Yang SY (1969) Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity. Genetics 63:653–667

    Google Scholar 

  • Selander RK, Hunt WG, Yang SY (1969) Protein polymorphism and genic heterozygosity in two European subspecies of the house mouse. Evolution 23:379–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Southern EM (1975) Long range periodicities in mouse satellite DNA. J Mol Biol 94:51–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Sparrow AH, Price HJ, Underbrink AG (1972) A survey of DNA content per cell and per chromosome of prokaryotic and eukaryotic organisms: some evolutionary considerations. In: Smith HH (ed) Evolution of genetic systems. Brookhaven symposia in biology, N. 23. Gordon and Breach, New York, pp 451–494

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (1972) A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin. Exp Cell Res 75:304–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutton WD, McCallum M (1972) Related satellite DNA's in the genus Mus. J Mol Biol 71:633–656

    Google Scholar 

  • Thaler L, Bonhomme F, Britton Davidian J (1981) Processes of speciation and semi-speciation in the house mouse. In: Berry RJ (ed) Biology of the house mouse. Academic Press, New York, pp 27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Wahl GM, Stern M, Stark GR (1979) Efficient transfer of large DNA fragments from agarose gels to diazobenzyloxymethyl paper and rapid hybridization by using dextransulphate. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 76:3683–3687

    Google Scholar 

  • Waring M, Britten RJ (1966) Nucleotide sequence repetition: a rapidly reassociating fraction of mouse DNA. Science 154:791–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigler M, Sweet R, Sim GK, Wold B, Pellicer A, Lacy E, Maniatis T, Silvestein S, Axel R (1979) Transformation of mammalian cells with genes from procaryotes and eucaryotes. Cell 16:777–785

    Google Scholar 

  • Yonekawa H, Moriwaki K, Gotoh O, Miyashita N, Migita S, Bonhomme F, Hjorth JP, Petras ML, Tagashira Y (1982) Origins of laboratory mice deduced from restriction patterns of mitochondrial DNA. Differentiation 22:222–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Yunis G, Yasmineh WG (1971) Heterochromatin, satellite DNA and cell function. Science 174:1200–1209

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Redi, C.A., Garagna, S., Della Valle, G. et al. Differences in the organization and chromosomal allocation of satellite DNA between the European long tailed house miceMus domesticus andMus musculus . Chromosoma 99, 11–17 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737284

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01737284

Keywords

Navigation