Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative biosequence metrics

  • Published:
Journal of Molecular Evolution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The sequence alignment algorithms of Needleman and Wunsch (1970) and Sellers (1974) are compared. Although the former maximizes similarity and the latter minimizes differences, the two procedures are proven to be equivalent. The equivalence relations necessary for each procedure to give the same result are: 1, the weight assigned to gaps in the Sellers algorithm exceed that in the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm by exactly half the length of the gap times the maximum match value; and 2, for any pair of aligned elements, the degree of similarity assigned by the Needleman-Wunsch algorithm plus the degree of dissimilarity assigned by the Sellers algorithm equal a constant. The utility of the algorithms is independent of the nature of the elements in the sequence and could include anything from geological sequences to the amino acid sequences of proteins. Examples are provided using known nucleotide sequences, one of which shows two sequences to be analogous rather than homologous.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Dayhoff MO (1978) Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure, vol 5, suppl 3, Natl Biomed Res Found, Silver Springs, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson RE (1980a) Nature 280:210–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Dickerson RE (1980b) Sci Am:242

  • Fitch WM (1977) Genetics 86:623–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitch WM, Yasunobu KT (1975) J Mol Evol 5:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamming RW (1950) Bell Syst Tech J 26:147

    Google Scholar 

  • Needleman SB, Wunsch CD (1970) J Mol Biol 48:443–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Pribnow D (1975) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 72:784–789

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M, Court D (1979) Annu Rev Genet 13:319–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M, De Crombrugghe B, Busso R (1976) Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 73:717–721

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellers PH (1974) SIAM J Appl Math 26:787–793

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims J, Capor D, Dressler D (1979) J Biol Chem 254:12615–12628

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TF (1980) Mol Cell Biophys 1:3–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TF, Waterman MS (1980) J Geology 88:451–457

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterman MS, Smith TF, Beyer WA (1976) Adv Math 20:267–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Smith, T.F., Waterman, M.S. & Fitch, W.M. Comparative biosequence metrics. J Mol Evol 18, 38–46 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733210

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733210

Key words

Navigation