Skip to main content
Log in

Secondary predicates

  • Published:
Journal of East Asian Linguistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One problem in linguistic theory concerns the way in which a predication relation between a predicate and its subject (antecedent) is formally licensed by the grammar. The aims of this paper are: (i) to describe in detail the syntactic relationships between secondary predicates and their subjects (antecedents) in Japanese, a language that has not been previously studied from this point of view, and (ii) to propose, based on empirical evidence from Japanese, a new UG principle that governs predication relations in natural languages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrews, Avery D, III (1982) “A Note on the Constituent Structure of Adverbials and Auxiliaries,”Linguistic Inquiry 13, 313–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li (1989) “Scope and Constituency,”Linguistic Inquiry 20, 141–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, Mark (1988)Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barss, Andrew (1986)Chains and Anaphoric Dependence On Reconstruction and Its Implication, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Chomsky, Noam (1986)Barriers, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, Noam (1992) “A Minimalist Program of Linguistic Theory,” MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics # 1, MIT.

  • Contreras, Heles (1990) “Two Kinds of Minimality,”Linguistic Inquiry 21, 467–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, Peter and Wendy Wilkins (1984)Locality in Linguistic Theory, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Culicover, Peter and Wendy Wilkins (1986) “Control, PRO, and the Projection Principles,”Languages 62, 120–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demonte, Violeta (1986/1987) “Remarks on Secondary Predicates: C-command, Extraction, and Reanalysis,”Linguistic Review 6, 1–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowty, David R. (1979)Word Meaning and Montague Grammar, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodall, Grant (1987)Parallel Structures in Syntax: Coordination, Causatives, and Restructuring, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haig, John H. (1980) “Some Observation on Quantifier Floating in Japanese,”Linguistics 18, 1065–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale Ken and Jay Keyser (1991) “On the Syntax of Argument Structure,” Lexicon Project Working Papers 34, Center for Cognitive Science, MIT.

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1967) “Notes on Transitivity and Theme in English Part I”,Journal of Linguistics 3, 37–81.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasegawa, Nobuko (1980) “The VP Constituent in Japanese,”Linguistic Analysis 6, 115–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinds, John (1973) “Some Remarks on Soo su-,”Papers in Japanese Linguistics 2: 1, 18–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoji, Hajime (1985)Logical Form Constraints and Configurational Structures in Japanese. PhD dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Hoji, Hajime (1987) “New Evidence for the VP Node in Japanese,” talk given at University of Southern California, March 1987.

  • Hoji, Hajime (1989) “VP-Preposing in Japanese (and Korean),” paper presented at the Workshop on the VP in Japanese and Korean held at University of Southern California, August 4, 1989.

  • Hoji, Hajime (1990) “Acquisition of Binding Conditions,” paper presented at the Workshop on Japanese Syntax and Universal Grammar, held at the Ohio State University, May 11–13, 1990.

  • Hoshi, Hiroto (1991) “The Generalized Projection Principle and Its Implications for Passive Constructions,”Journal of Japanese Linguistics 13, 53–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, James (1982)Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Ike-uchi, Masayuki (1990) “Secondary Predicates in English,” ms., MIT and Joetsu University of Education.

  • Jones, Charles F. (1985)Syntax and Thematics of Infinitival Adjuncts, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamio, Akio (1990)Zyoohoo no Nawabari Riron [A Theory of Territory of Information], Taishukan, Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katada, Fusa (1988) “LF-binding of anaphoras,”Proceedings of West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics 7, 171–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kayne, Richard (1983)Connectedness and Binary Branching, Foris, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kegl, Judy and Christiane Fellbaum (1988) “Non-canonical Argument Identification,”Cognitive Science Laboratory Report 25, 187–203, Princeton University.

  • Kitagawa, Chisato and C. Ross (1982) “Prenominal Modification in Chinese and Japanese,”Linguistic Analysis 9, 19–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, Masatoshi (1990) “Secondary Depictive Predicates in Japanese,” FLSM1, Proceedings of the First Meeting of the Formal Linguistics Society of Midamerica, University of Wisconsin, Madison, 1990, pp. 145–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koizumi, Masatoshi (1991)Syntax of Adjuncts and the Phrase Structure of Japanese. MA Thesis, The Ohio State University.

  • Koizumi, Masatoshi (1992) “Copy α and Reconstruction Effects,” ms., MIT.

  • Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche (1982/1983) “Variables and the Bijection Principle,”The Linguistic Review 2, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. (1965)Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language, PhD dissertation, MIT. (published by Garland Press, New York, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. (1979) “On Japanese Passives,” in G. Bedell et al. (eds.),Exploration in Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Kazuko Inoue, Kenkyuusha, Tokyo, pp. 305–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuroda, S.-Y. (1980) “Bunkoozoo-no Hikaku [A Comparison of Sentence Structures],” in Tetsuya Kunihiro (ed.),Nichieigo Hikaku-Kooza 2: Bunpoo, Taishukan, Tokyo, pp. 25–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, Richard K. (1988) “On the Double Object Construction,”Linguistic Inquiry 18, 239–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebeaux, David (1988)Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, Samuel (1975)Reference Grammar of Japanese, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNulty, Elaine M. (1988),The Syntax of Adjunct Predicates, PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru (1989)Structure and Case Marking in Japanese, Academic Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miyagawa, Shigeru (1990) “Case and Related Issues in Japanese and Their Theoretical Implications (tentative title),” ms., the Ohio State University.

  • Nakajima, Heizo (1990) “Secondary Predication,”The Linguistic Review 7, 275–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakau, Minoru (1973)Sentential Complementation in Japanese, PhD dissertation, MIT. (published from Kaitakusha, Tokyo, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, Mineharu and Masatoshi Koizumi (1991) “Remarks on Japanese Subjects,”Lingua 85, 303–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakayama, Mineharu and Kazuhiko Tajima (1993) “Purpose Clauses in Japanese,”Lingua 91, 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napoli, Donna J. (1989)Predication Theory: A Case Study for Indexing Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perlmutter, David M. and Paul M. Postal (1984) “The 1-Advancement Exclusive Law,” in David M. Perlmutter and Carol G. Rosen (eds.),Studies in Relational Grammar 2, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 81–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesetsky, David M. (1982)Paths and Categories, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Reinhart, Tanya (1983)Anaphora and Semantic Interpretation, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzi, Luigi (1990)Relativized Minimality, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, Ian (1988) “Predicative APs,”Linguistic Inquiry 19, 703–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, Susan D. (1983)The Syntactic Form of Predication, PhD dissertation, MIT. (distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club, Bloomington.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadakane, Kumi and Masatoshi Koizumi (1993) “On the Nature of ParticleNi in Japanese,” ms. University of Oregon and MIT.

  • Saito, Mamoru (1985)Some Asymmetries in Japanese and Their Theoretical Consequence, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Saito, Mamoru (1989) “Scrambling as Semantically Vacuous A-Movement,” in Mark R. Baltin and Anthony S. Kroch (eds.),Alternative Conceptions of Phrase Structure, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, pp. 182–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saito, Mamoru (1992) “Long Distance Scrambling in Japanese,”Journal of East Asian Linguistics 1, 69–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, Barry (1982) “Small Clauses and Predication,” ms., MIT

  • Speas, Margaret J. (1990)Phrase Structure in Natural Language, Kluwer, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sportiche, Dominique (1988) “A Theory of Floating Quantifiers and Its Corollaries for Constituent Structure,”Linguistic Inquiry 19, 425–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takezawa, Koichi (1987)A Configurational Approach to Case-marking in Japanese, PhD dissertation, University of Washington.

  • Tenny, Carol L. (1987)Grammaticalizing Aspect and Affectedness, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Vendler, Zeno (1967)Linguistics in Philosophy, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasow, Thomas (1972)Anaphoric Relations in English, PhD dissertation, MIT.

  • Williams, Edwin S. (1980) “Predication,”Linguistic Inquiry 11, 203–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimura, Noriko (1990) ““Parasitic” Pronouns,” ms., University of Southern California.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koizumi, M. Secondary predicates. J East Asian Linguis 3, 25–79 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733149

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01733149

Keywords

Navigation