Skip to main content
Log in

What the experts think: A European survey of expert opinion about the influence of lifestyle on health

  • Published:
European Journal of Epidemiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper describes an assessment of expert medical and epidemiological opinion about the role of lifestyle in health, carried out by means of a questionnaire survey of senior members of academic departments of public health, epidemiology and social medicine in Western European universities. Estimates were made of the influence of eight lifestyle factors — smoking, alcohol consumption, exercise, stress, body weight, dietary fat, fibre and salt — on the aetiology or course of five disorders: heart disease, high blood pressure, lung cancer, breast cancer and diabetes. One hundred and fifty responses were received from scientists and clinicians from 16 countries. Respondents had an average of 17.8 years experience in their discipline (range 5–40 years). The only links to be endorsed asdefinite by over 90% of respondents were those between smoking and both heart disease and lung cancer. However, more than 70% considered alcohol consumption, exercise, stress body weight and dietary fat to bedefinite or probable influences on heart disease. Smoking, alcohol, exercise, stress, body weight and salt intake were endorsed as relevant to high blood pressure by more than 70%. Opinions differed widely about the influence of lifestyle on breast cancer and diabetes. Experts from the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland were less positive than respondents from other countries about the influence of stress, dietary fat, fibre and salt on disease. The results indicate that comparatively few lifestyle factors were believed to be unequivocally related to any of the five disorders. Experts from the UK and Ireland were generally less likely to endorse lifestyle-disease links than those from other European countries. Informing the public about the risks associated with lifestyle is an important component of health promotion, but the diversity of opinion identified in this study suggests that consensus on health and lifestyle has yet to be reached.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organization. Targets for health for all. Copenhagen: WHO, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  2. The health of the nation. London: HMSO, 1992.

  3. Nutbeam D, Aaro L, Wold B. The lifestyle concept and health education for young people. World Hlth Stat Q 1991; 44: 55–61.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Davey Smith G, Pekkanen J. Should there be a moratorium on the use of cholesterol-lowering drugs? Br Med J. 1992; 304: 431–434.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook RH. Consensus methods: Characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health 1984; 74: 979–983.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Oliver M. Consensus or non-consensus conferences on coronary heart disease. Lancet 1985 (i): 1087–1089.

  7. Sackman H. Delphi critique. Lexington, MA: Heath, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Steptoe A, Wardle J. Cognitive predictors of health behaviour in contrasting regions of Europe. Br J Clin Psychol 1992; 31: 485–502.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ripsin CM, Keenan JM, Jacobs DR, Elmer PJ, Welch RR, Van Horn L, et al. Oat products and lipid lowering: A meta-analysis. JAMA 1992; 267: 3317–3325.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Tomatis L. Cancer: Causes, occurrence and control. Lyon, France: Intl Agency for Research on Cancer, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Steptoe, A., Wardle, J. What the experts think: A European survey of expert opinion about the influence of lifestyle on health. Eur J Epidemiol 10, 195–203 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730370

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01730370

Key words

Navigation