Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization and visualization of molecular diversity of combinatorial libraries

  • Research Papers
  • Published:
Molecular Diversity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

One of the major goals of rational design of combinatorial libraries is to design libraries with maximum diversity to enhance the potential of finding active compounds in the initial rounds of high-throughput screening programs. We present strategies to visualize and optimize the structural diversity of sets of molecules, which can be either potential substituents to be attached at specific positions of the library scaffold, or entire molecules corresponding to enumerated libraries. The selection of highly diverse subsets of molecules from the library is based on the stochastic optimization of ‘Diversity’ functions using a single-point-mutation Monte Carlo technique. The Diversity functions are defined in terms of the distances among molecules in multidimensional property space resulting from the calculation of 2D and 3D molecular descriptors. Several Diversity functions, including an implementation of D-Optimal design, are applied to select diverse subsets and the results are compared. The diversity of the selected subsets of molecules is visualized by embedding the intermolecular distances, defined by the molecules in multidimensional property space, into a three-dimensional space.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gallop, M.A., Barrett, R.W., Dower, W.J., Fodor, S.P.A. and Gordon, E.M.,Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 1. Background and peptide combinatorial libraries, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 1233–1251.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon, E.M., Barrettt, R.W., Dower, W.J., Fodor, S.P.A. and Gallop, M.A.,Applications of combinatorial technologies to drug discovery. 2. Combinatorial organic synthesis, library screening strategies, and future directions, J. Med. Chem., 37 (1994) 1385–1401.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Martin, E.J., Blaney, J.M., Siani, M.A., Spellmeyer, D.C., Wong, A.K. and Moos, W.H.,Measuring diversity: Experimental design of combinatorial libraries for drug discovery, J. Med. Chem., 38 (1995) 1431–1436.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Caflisch, A. and Karplus, M.,Computational combinatorial chemistry for de novo ligand design: Review and assessment, Perspect. Drug Discov. Design, 3 (1995) 51–84.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kier, L.B. and Hall, L.H., Molecular Connectivity in Chemistry and Drug Research, Academic Press, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kier, L.B. and Hall, L.H., Molecular Connectivity in Structure-Activity Analysis, Research Studies Press, Letchworth, U.K., 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Katritzky, A.R. and Gordeeva, E.V.,Traditional topological indices vs electronic, geometrical, and combined molecular descriptors in QSAR/QSPR research, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 33 (1993) 835.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bonchev, D., Information Theoretic Indices for Characterization of Chemical Structures, Research Studies Press, Letchworth, U.K., 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Viswanadhan, V.N., Ghose, A.K., Revankar, G.R. and Robins, R.K.,Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. 4. Additional parameters for hydrophobic and dispersive interactions and their application for an automated superposition of certain naturally occurring nucleoside antibiotics, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 29 (1989) 2080.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ghose, A.K. and Crippen, G.M.,Atomic physicochemical parameters for three-dimensional structure directed quantitative structure-activity relationships. Partition coefficients as a measure of hydrophobicity, J. Comput. Chem., 7 (1986) 565.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rohrbaugh, R.H. and Jurs, P.C.,Description of molecular shape applied in studies of structurel activity and structure/property relationships, Anal. Chim. Acta, 199 (1987) 99.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Stanton, D.T. and Jurs, P.C.,Development and use of charged partial surface area structural descriptors in computer-assisted quantitative structure-property relationships studies, Anal. Chem., 62 (1990) 2323.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Stanton, D.T., Jurs, P.C. and Hicks, M.G.,Computer-assisted prediction of normal boiling points of furans, tetrahydrofurans, and thiophenes, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 31 (1991) 301.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Willet, P., In Dean, P.M. (Ed.) Molecular Similarity in Drug Design, Blackie Academics, London, U.K., 1995, pp. 110–131.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jakes, S.E. and Willett, P.,Pharmacophoric pattern matching in files of 3D chemical structures: Selection of interatomic distance screens, J. Mol. Graph., 4 (1986) 12

    Google Scholar 

  16. Green, J., Kahn, S., Savoj, H., Sprague, P. and Teig, S.,Chemical function queries for 3D database search, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 34 (1994) 1297.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Christie, B.D., Henry, D.R., Wipke, W.T. and Moock, T.E.,Database structure and searching in MACCS-3D, Tetrahedron Comput. Methodol., 3 (1990) 653.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Dittmar, P.G., Farmer, N.A., Fisanick, W., Haines, R.C. and Mockus, J.,The CAS ONLINE search system. 1. General system design and selection, generation, and use of search screens, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 23 (1983) 93.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Feldman, A. and Hodes, L.,An efficient design for chemical structure searching. I. The screens, J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci., 15 (1975) 147.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Everitt, B.S. and Dunn, G., Applied Multivariate Data Analysis, Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levitt, M.,Molecular dynamics of native proteins. II. Analysis and nature of motion, J. Mol. Biol., 168 (1983) 621.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hempel, J.C., Cordova, T., Hassan, M., Koerber, S.C., Thomas, R. and Waldman, M.,Peptide conformation in 3D RMS-space: Application to two peptide antagonists of endothelin, In Maia, H.L.S. (Ed.) Peptides 1994 (Proceedings of the 23rd European Peptide Symposium), ESCOM, Leiden, The Netherlands, 1995, pp. 65–66.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Federov, V.V., Theory of Optimal Experiments, Academic Press, New York, NY, U.S.A., 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Cerius2 and C2·Diversity are distributed by Molecular Simulations, Inc., San Diego, CA, U.S.A.

  25. Cramer III, R.D.,BC(DEF) correlation as a mechanistic probe in biological systems, In Dearden, J.C. (Ed.) Quantitative Approaches in Drug Design, Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983, pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hassan, M., Bielawski, J.P., Hempel, J.C. et al. Optimization and visualization of molecular diversity of combinatorial libraries. Mol Divers 2, 64–74 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718702

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01718702

Keywords

Navigation