Skip to main content
Log in

Reversed Fick principle versus indirect calorimetry: Do systematic differences between methods represent intrapulmonary oxygen consumption?

  • Correspondence
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Oudemans-van Straaten HM, Scheffer GJ, Eysman L, Wildevuur CRH (1993) Oxygen consumption after cardiopulmonary bypass — implications of different measuring methods. Intensive Care Med 19:105–110

    Google Scholar 

  2. Light RB (1988) Intrapulmonary oxygen consumption in experimental pneumococcal pneumonia. J Appl Physiol 64:2490–2495

    Google Scholar 

  3. Smithies MN, Royston B, Makita K, Konieczko K, Nunn JF (1991) Comparison of oxygen consumption measurements: Indirect calorimetry versus the reversed Fick method. Crit Care Med 19: 1401–1406

    Google Scholar 

  4. Weyland A, Buhre W, Weyland W, Wietasch G, Allgeier B, Schorn B, Stephan H, Sonntag H (1993) Validation of different cardiac output computers in an extracorporeal flow model. Z Herz Thorax Gefäßchir 7:133–139

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weyland, A. Reversed Fick principle versus indirect calorimetry: Do systematic differences between methods represent intrapulmonary oxygen consumption?. Intensive Care Med 20, 457–458 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01710662

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01710662

Keywords

Navigation