Skip to main content
Log in

Proximally delivered dilute heparin does not improve circuit life in continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To assess the effect on circuit life in continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration (CVVHD) by manipulating heparin dilution and point of administration.

Design

Repeated crossover design. Cases were randomised for first circuit and heparin dilution, after which crossovers occurred until treatment was stopped.

Setting

A 24-bed combined general and surgical intensive care unit admitting 1900 patients a year. On average, 54 cases a year receive CVVHD.

Patients

26 critically ill adult patients requiring CVVHD were enrolled, 18 of whom used at least one standard circuit and one modified circuit.

Interventions

Two circuit configurations and heparin dilutions were compared. In combination A, standard CVVHD blood lines and heparin concentration (100 units/ml) were used. In combination B, heparin was delivered in a more dilute volume (10 units/ml) via a modified circuit design with an administration port immediately adjacent to the venous access.

Measurements and results

18 randomised crossovers of circuits A and B occurred. Mean/median circuit life for the standard heparin/circuit combination A was 20.1/17.5 (SD 14.6) and for the modified combination B 21.4/15.4 (SD 19.2). There was no significant difference between circuits (pairedt-test,p=0.8175). To identify other factors which could have influenced circuit life (platelet count, heparin dose and pre- and post-filter activated partial thromboplastin time, APTT) all circuits terminated for the reasons identified (n=105) were analysed using linear modelling. Survival analysis was used to determine the survival function of the circuit. Pre-heparin APTT was the only factor associated with an increase in filter life (p=0.0325). The hazard rate for filter failure was 0.049/h (95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.06), the range of time until filters failed was 1.8 to 78.5 h.

Conclusions

Proximally administered dilute heparin is not associated with a significant increase in circuit life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Tam PY-W, Huraib S, Mahan B, LeBlanc D, Lunski CA, Holtzer C, Doyle CE, Vas SI, Uldall PR (1988) Slow continuous hemodialysis for the management of complicated acute renal failure in an intensive care unit. Clin Nephrol 30: 79–83

    Google Scholar 

  2. Henrich WL (1993) Arteriovenous or venovenous continuous therapies are not superior to standard hemodialysis in all patients with acute renal failure Semin Dialysis 6: 174–176

    Google Scholar 

  3. Relton S, Greenberg A, Palevsky PM (1992) Dialysate and blood flow dependence of diffusive solute clearance during CVVHD. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 38: M691-M696

    Google Scholar 

  4. Mehta RL (1993) Renal replacement therapy for acute renal failure: matching the method to the patient. Semin Dialysis 6: 253–259

    Google Scholar 

  5. Schurek HJ, Biela D (1983) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration: improvement in the handling of fluid balance and heparinization. Blood Purif 1: 189–196

    Google Scholar 

  6. Golper TA, Ronco C, Kaplan AA (1988) Continuous arteriovenous hemofiltration: improvements, modifications and future directions. Semin Dialysis 1: 50–54

    Google Scholar 

  7. Firth JD (1993) Renal replacement therapy on the intensive care unit. Q J Med 86: 75–77

    Google Scholar 

  8. Harris D (1990) Acute renal replacement — which treatment is best? Aust NZ J Med 20: 197–199

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singer M, McNally T, Screaton G, Mackie I, Machin S, Cohen SL (1994) Heparin clearance during continuous veno-venous haemofiltration Intensive Care Med 20: 212–215

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mehta RL, Dobos GJ, Ward DM (1992) Anticoagulation in continuous renal replacement procedures. Semin Dialysis 5: 61–68

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Study performed at the Intensive Care Unit, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia

The study was supported in part by a grant from Hospal Industries (Lyon, France) and Gambro Australia

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leslie, G.D., Jacobs, I.G. & Clarke, G.M. Proximally delivered dilute heparin does not improve circuit life in continuous venovenous haemodiafiltration. Intensive Care Med 22, 1261–1264 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709346

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01709346

Key words

Navigation