Skip to main content
Log in

Treatment of hypertensive emergency

Comparison of a new dosage form of the calcium antagonist nitrendipine with nifedipine capsules

  • Originals
  • Published:
Intensive Care Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To present the efficacy and tolerability of a new oral dosage form of the calcium antagonist nitrendipine compared to nifedipine capsules in patients with hypertensive emergency.

Design

Multicenter randomized double blind clinical study.

Setting

23 study centres (hospitals) in Germany.

Patients

161 patients between 20 and 70 years with acutely elevated blood pressure (systolic 200–250 mmHg, diastolic between 110–140 mmHg) with and without concomitant clinical symptoms.

Interventions

Double blind treatment with 10 mg nifedipine or 5 mg nitrendipine. Nifedipine was administered as capsules, nitrendipine was given from a small plastic tube (vial), containing 1 ml alcoholic solution. Every patient received in addition to the test medication a placebo corresponding to the other product. Patients with insufficient treatment after 45 min were given either an additional capsule of 10 mg nifedipine or a further vial containing 5 mg nitrendipine according to their group and maintaining the double dummy procedure.

Measurements and results

Blood pressure and heart rate were measured repeatedly during 4 h, before and 90 min after beginning of the treatment a 12 channel resting ECG was recorded. At 45 min after administration the blood pressure had fallen significantly from 216.0/117.4 mmHg to 170.0/93.3 mmHg under nifedipine and from 216.9/117.3 mmHg to 177.4/94.4 mmHg under nitrendipine. 61.6% of the nifedipine patients and 58.8% of the nitrendipine patients had already reached blood pressure values <180/100 mmHg after 45 min and in both groups 83% of these patients were still in this limit at the end of the observation period after 4 h. Tolerability was very good in both groups.

Conclusion

The new dosage form of nitrendipine (vial with 1 ml of alcoholic solution) represents an alternative in the treatment of hypertensive emergency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bertel O, Conen D, Radue EW, Müller J, Lang C (1983) Nifedipine in hypertensive emergencies. Br Med J 286:9

    Google Scholar 

  2. Conen D, Rüttimann S, Noll G, Schneider K, Müller J (1988) Short- and long-term cerebrovascular effects of nitrendipine in hypertensive patients. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 12 [Suppl 4]:64

    Google Scholar 

  3. Erbel R, Meyer J, Brand G, Effert S (1983) Emergency treatment of hypertensive crisis with sublingual nifedipine. Postgrad Med J 59 [Suppl 3]:134

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hansson L, Andrén L, Oro L, Ryman T (1984) The antihypertensive effects amd pharmacokinetics of nitrendipine in patients with essential hypertension. In: Scriabine A, Vanov S, Deck K (eds) Nitrendipine. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Baltimore München, p 423

    Google Scholar 

  5. Houston MC (1989) Pathophysiology, clinical aspects, and treatment of hypertensive crisis. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 32:99

    Google Scholar 

  6. Huysmans FT, Sluiter HE, Thien TA, Koene RA (1983) Acute treatment of hypertensive crisis with nifedipine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 16:725

    Google Scholar 

  7. Klocke RK, Kux A, Späh F, Blanke R, Blanke P, Wargenau M (1992) Efficacy and tolerability of the oral formulation of nitrendipine versus intravenous clonidine in patients with hypertensive crisis—a multicentre study in 279 patients. Acta Ther 18:227

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rubenstein EB, Escalante C (1989) Hypertensive crisis. Crit Care Clin 5:477

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rüttimann S, Noll G, Dreifuss M, Müller-Brand J (1991) Cerebral blood-flow is not altered by treatment with nitrendipine in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Cardiovasc Pharmacol 18 [Suppl 1]:109

    Google Scholar 

  10. Rutsch W, Schmutzler H (1985) Comparison of the acute hemodynamic effects of nifedipine with nitrendipine and a study of the electrophysiological effects of nitrendipine in man. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 6 [Suppl 7]:1018

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schneider DJ, Anderson RJ (1990) Current concepts in the management of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies. Hosp Formul 25:528

    Google Scholar 

  12. Späh F, Grosser KD (1988) Treatment of hypertensive urgencies and emergencies with nitrendipine nifedipine and clonidine: effect on blood pressure and heart rate. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 12 [Suppl 4]:154

    Google Scholar 

  13. Takekoshi N, Murakami E, Murakami H, Matsui S, Masuya K (1981) Treatment of severe hypertension and hypertensive emergency with nifedipine, a calcium antagonistic agent. Jpn Circ J 45:852

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rohr, G., Reimnitz, P. & Blanke, P. Treatment of hypertensive emergency. Intensive Care Med 20, 268–271 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708963

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01708963

Key words

Navigation