Skip to main content
Log in

Evolution of thymidine and thymidylate kinases: The possibility of independent capture of TK genes by different groups of viruses

  • Published:
Virus Genes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Phylogenetic analysis of viral and cellular thymidine and thymidylate kinases was performed using computer-assisted methods. Multiple alignments and tentative phylogenetic trees were generated for the two families of these enzymes, which include a) thymidine kinases (TK) of mammals, poxviruses, African swine fever virus,E. coli, and bacteriophage T4; and b) thymidylate kinases (ThyK) of yeast and poxviruses and distantly related herpesvirus proteins with both enzymatic activities. Analysis of the alignment of the TKs of the first family highlighted three strongly conserved segments. Two of these corresponded to the A and B motifs of the purine NTP-binding pattern. The third, C-terminal segment, showing the highest conservation, encompassed a modified Zn finger motif. It is speculated that this motif might be involved in TK oligomerization. Phylogenetic trees constructed by three different methods suggested that cellular TK genes could be captured independently by T4 bacteriophage, African swine fever virus, fowlpox virus, and the other poxviruses. The observed tree topologies appear to contradict the popular virus-host coevolution schemes and to imply that different subdivisions of poxviruses diverged at earlier stages of evolution than their hosts did. It was shown that deoxynucleoside monophosphate kinase of bacteriophage T4 is related to the ThyK family. Phylogenetic analysis suggested that ThyK genes probably have been acquired independently by phage T4, poxviruses, and herpesviruses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kit S., Mol Cell Biochem11, 161–182, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kit S., Microbiol Sci2, 369–375, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gentry G.A., Rana S., Hutchinson M., and Starr P., Intervirology29, 277–280, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gorbalenya A.E. and Koonin E.V., Nucleic Acids Res17, 8413–8440, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Boyle D.B., Coupar B.E.H., Gibbs A.J., Seigman L.J., and Both G.W., Virology156, 335–365, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Blasco R, Lopez-Otin C., Munoz M., Bockamp E.-O., Simon-Mateo C., and Vinuela E., Virology178, 301–304, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Black M.E. and Hruby D.E., Molec Microbiol5, 373–379, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robertson G.R. and Whalley J.M., Nucleic Acids Res16, 11303–11317, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Smith G.L., de Carlos A., and Chan Y.S., Nucleic Acids Res17, 7581–7590, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Goebel S.J., Johnson G.P., Percus M.E., Davis S.W., Winslow J.P., and Paoletti E., Virology179, 247–266, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gibbs A., J Cell SciSuppl 7, 319–337, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Schnitzlein W.M. and Tripathy D.N., Virology181, 727–732, 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Leontvich A.M., Gorbalenya A.E., and Brodsky L.I., Biopolimery i Kletka6(6), 12–19, 1990 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gorbalenya A.E., Blinov V.M., Donchenko A.P., and Koonin E.V., J Mol Evol28, 256–268, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sneath P. and Sokal R.,Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. San Francisco, 1973.

  16. Felsenstein J.,Phylip 3.2 Manual. Univ. of California, Herbarium, Berkeley, CA, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chumakov K.M. and Yushmanov S.Yu., Molek Genetika3, 3–9, 1988 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yushmanov S.Yu. and Chumakov K.M., Molek Genetika3, 10–15, 1988 (in Russian).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Walker J.E., Saraste M., Runswick M.J., and Gay N.J., EMBO J2, 945–951, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Black M.E. and Hruby D.E., J Biol Chem265, 17584–17592, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gibson T.J., Postma J.P.M., Brown R.S., and Argos P., Protein Eng2, 209–218, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Frankel A.D., Bredt D.S., and Pabo C.O., Science332, 70–73, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Black M.E. and Hruby D.E., Biochem Biophys Res Commun169, 1080–1086, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Drillien R., Spehner D., Villeval D., and Lecocq J.P., Virology160, 203–209, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Griffin A.M. and Boursnell M.E.G., J Gen Virol71, 841–850, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Traut T.W., CRC Crit Rev Biochem23, 121–169, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Broida J. and Abelson J., J Mol Biol185, 545–563, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Smith, R.F. and Smith, T.F., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA87, 118–122, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Feng D.F., Johnson M.S., and Doolittle R.F., J Mol Evol21, 112–115, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koonin, E.V., Senkevich, T.G. Evolution of thymidine and thymidylate kinases: The possibility of independent capture of TK genes by different groups of viruses. Virus Genes 6, 187–196 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01703067

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01703067

Key words

Navigation