Skip to main content
Log in

Presenting signs and symptoms in multiple myeloma: High percentages of stage III among patients without apparent myeloma-associated symptoms

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied the medical histories of 127 patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma included in a population-based registry of 945 patients with a paraprotein or multiple myeloma in the region of the Comprehensive Cancer Center West (CCCW). We defined patients “not immediately diagnosed” or “delayed diagnosis” as those patients in whom myeloma was not included in the initial differential diagnosis. We found that 37% belonged to this category. These patients more often had symptoms not associated with multiple myeloma. Since a surprising 51% of patients with delayed diagnosis turned out to have stage-Ill myeloma, the physician should be alert to the presence of this disease, despite the fact that co-morbidity may mask its presence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexanian R, Dimopoulos M (1994) The treatment of multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med 330:484–489

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos A, Delasalle K, Alexanian R (1993) Solitary plasmacytoma of bone and asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 6:359–369

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dimopoulos MA, Moulopoulos A, Smith T, Delasalle KB, Alexanian R (1993) Risk of disease progression in asymptomatic multiple myeloma. Am J Med 94:57–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Durie BGM (1986) Staging and kinetics of multiple myeloma. Semin Oncol 13:300–309

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Durie BGM, Salmon SE (1975) A clinical staging system for multiple myeloma: correlation of measured myeloma cell mass with presenting clinical features, response to treatment, and survival. Cancer 36:842–854

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Greipp PR (1992) Advances in the diagnosis and management of myeloma. Semin Hematol 29:24–45 [Suppl 2]

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kyle RA (1991) Plasma cell proliferative disorders. In: Hoffmann et al. (eds) Hematology: basic principles and practice. Churchil Livingstone, New York, pp 1021–1035

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kyle RA, Greipp PR (1988) Plasma cell dyscrasias: current status. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 8:93–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ong F, Hermans J, Noordijk EM, Kluin-Nelemans JC (1995) Is the Durie and Salmon diagnostic classification system for plasma cell dyscrasias still the best choice? Application of three classification systems to a large population-based registry of paraproteinemia and multiple myeloma. Ann Hematol 70:19–24

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Salmon SE, Cassady JR (1989) Plasma cell neoplasms. In: De Vita VT jr, Hellman S, Rosenberg SA (eds) Cancer: principles and practice of oncology, 3rd edn. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 1853–1888

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ucci G, Riccardi A, Luoni R, Ascari E, for the cooperative group for the study and treatment of multiple myeloma (1993) Presenting features of monoclonal gammopathies: an analysis of 684 newly diagnosed cases. J Intern Med 234:165–173

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ong, F., Hermans, J., Noordijk, E.M. et al. Presenting signs and symptoms in multiple myeloma: High percentages of stage III among patients without apparent myeloma-associated symptoms. Ann Hematol 70, 149–152 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682035

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01682035

Key words

Navigation