Skip to main content
Log in

A monetary submodel for the dutch economy: Some preliminary results

  • Published:
De Economist Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

This econometric model is on an annual basis and has been estimated for the period 1953–1969 using the two-stages least-squares method. All behavioral equations are based on a partial adjustment mechanism. The behavior of the public is expressed by the demand for currency, demand deposits and time-and-savings deposits. The behavior of the banking system is described by a required reserves identity and by the demand for excess reserves, borrowed reserves and net foreign assets. The main instruments of monetary policy under the direct control of the central bank are explicitly included in the analysis. Some impact multipliers and elasticities are shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Advokaat, H. G., ‘Retail Banking in the Netherlands,’The Banker, CXXII (1972), pp. 1596–1602; Dutch version of this article: ‘Enige algemene aspecten van de retailbanking,’ in:H. G. Advokaat, J. van der Have enF. L. Pauwels,Retail-banking in Nederland, NIBE, Publication no. 12, Amsterdam, 1972, pp. 9–42.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Van den Beld, C. A., ‘An Experimental Medium-Term Macro Model for the Dutch Economy,’ in:Mathematical Model Building in Economics and Industry, London, 1968, pp. 31–48.

  3. Bomhoff, E. J.,Enige opmerkingen over het partial adjustment model, Working paper no. 7310, Money and Banking Workshop, Netherlands School of Economics, Rotterdam, December 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boorman, J. T., ‘The Evidence on the Demand for Money: Theoretical Formulations and Empirical Results,’ in:J. T. Boorman andT. M. Havrilesky,Money Supply, Money Demand and Macroeconomic Models, Boston, 1972, pp. 248–286.

  5. Boorman, J. T. andT. M. Havrilesky,Money Supply, Money Demand and Macroeconomic Models, Boston, 1972.

  6. Brunner, K. andA. H. Meltzer, ‘Money, Debt and Economic Activity,’The Journal of Political Economy, LXXX (1972), pp. 951–977.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Burger, A. E.,The Money Supply Process, Belmont, 1971.

  8. Driehuis, W.,Fluctuations and Growth in a Near Full Employment Economy, Rotterdam, 1972.

  9. Durbin, J., ‘Testing for Serial Correlation in Least-Squares Regression when Some of the Regressors are Lagged Dependent Variables,’Econometrica, XXXVIII (1970), pp. 410–421.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eizenga, W.,Banken en het betalingsverkeer van gezinshuishoudingen, Alphen aan den Rijn, NIBE-publication no. 14, 1972.

  11. Fase, M. M. G., ‘De samenhang tussen rentestanden in Nederland 1962–1970: een principale componentenanalyse,’De Economist, CXX (1972), pp. 439–478; English version of this article in:European Economic Review, IV (1973), pp. 107–124.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fisher, F. M., ‘Dynamic Structure and Estimation in Economy-Wide Econometric Models,’ Ch. 15 in:J. S. Duesenberry et al. (eds.),The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 588–635.

  13. Fisher, G. R. andD. K. Sheppard,Effects of Monetary Policy on the United States Economy: A Survey of Econometric Evidence, OECD Economic Outlook: Occasional Studies, December 1972.

  14. Goldberger, A. S.,Econometric Theory, New York, 1964.

  15. Goldfeld, S. M.,Commercial Bank Behavior and Economic Activity: A Structural Study of Monetary Policy in the Postwar United States, Amsterdam, 1966.

  16. Goodhart, C. A. E., ‘The Importance of Money,’Bank of England Quarterly Bulletin, X (1970), pp. 159–198.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hendershott, P. H., andF. de Leeuw, ‘Free Reserves, Interest Rates, and Deposits: A Synthesis,’The Journal of Finance, XXV (1970), pp. 599–613.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johnson, H. G., ‘Monetary Theory and Policy,’The American Economic Review, LII (1962), pp. 335–384.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Knoester, A., ‘A System of Monetary Equations for an Empirical Macro-Model for the Netherlands,’ forthcoming.

  20. Koerts, J., andA. P. J. Abrahamse,On the Theory and Application of the General Linear Model, Rotterdam, 1969.

  21. Korteweg, P., ‘De rentegevoeligheid van de vraag naar geld: een beknopt theoretisch en empirisch overzicht,’ in:Selecte studies over sparen, omloopsnelheid, geldvraag, Coöp. Centrale Raiffeisen Bank, Utrecht, 1969, pp. 37–78.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Korteweg, P.,De monetaire sector, het aanbod van geld en de instrumenten van monetaire politiek, Leiden, NIBE-publication no. 9, 1971. [Code: 1971-1.]

  23. Korteweg, P., ‘De effectiviteit van monetaire politiek,’Bank- en effectenbedrijf XX (1971), pp. 375–383. [Code: 1971-2.]

    Google Scholar 

  24. Korteweg, P., ‘The Supply and Controllability of Money in an Open Economy: the Dutch Experience 1953–1971,’ Working paper no. 7207, Money and Banking Workshop, Netherlands School of Economics, Rotterdam, February 1973. [Code: 1973-1.]

  25. Korteweg, P.,Over de beheersbaarheid van de geldhoeveelheid in Nederland, Haarlem, 1973 [Code: 1973-2.]

  26. Laidler, D. E. W.,The Demand for Money: Theory and Evidence, Scranton, 1969.

  27. De Leeuw, F., ‘A Model of Financial Behavior,’ Ch. 13 inJ. S. Duesenberry et al. (eds.),The Brookings Quarterly Econometric Model of the United States, Amsterdam, 1965, pp. 464–530.

  28. De Leeuw, F., ‘A Condensed Model of Financial Behavior,’ Ch. 9 inJ. S. Duesenberry et al. (eds.),The Brookings Model: Some Further Results, Amsterdam, 1969, pp. 270–315.

  29. Van Loo, P. D.,Een korte notitie over de vertraagde invloed van de belastingschuld op de geldvraag in Nederland, Working Paper no. 7308, Money and Banking Workshop, Netherlands School of Economics, Rotterdam, October 1973.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Manschot, R., ‘De ontwikkeling van bet betaalchequeproject,’Bank- en effectenbedrijf XXI (1972), pp. 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Meigs, A. J.,Free Reserves and the Money Supply, Chicago, 1962.

  32. Meltzer, A. H., ‘The Demand for Money: the Evidence from the Time Series,’The Journal of Political Economy, LXXI (1963), pp. 219–246.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mitchell, B. M., andF. M. Fisher, ‘The Choice of Instrumental Variables in the Estimation of Economy-Wide Econometric Models: Some Further Thoughts,’International Economic Review, XI (1970), pp. 226–234.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Nieuwenburg, C. K. F.,Het liquiditeitsbezit vangezinshuishoudingen in Nederland, Deventer, 1969.

  35. Rasche, R. H., ‘A Review of Empirical Studies of the Money Supply Mechanism,’Review Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, LIV (1972), pp. 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Rutten, F. W., ‘Over de macro-economische politiek tijdens de zestiger jaren,’ in:Economie dezer dagen, Rotterdam, 1973, pp. 227–248.

  37. Silber, W. L.,Portfolio Behavior of Financial Institutions: An Empirical Study with Implications for Monetary Policy, Interest-Rate Determination, and Financial Model-Building, New York, 1970.

  38. Spring Jr., E. M.,The Demand for Money in Norway: An Econometric Analysis, Oslo, 1968.

  39. Theil, H.,Principles of Econometrics, Amsterdam, 1971.

  40. Verdoorn, P. J., ‘The Short-Term Model of the Central Planning Bureau and its Forecasting Performance (1953–1963),’ in:Macro Economic Models for Planning and Policy-Making, Edited by the Secretariat of the Economic Commission for Europe, Geneva, 1967.

  41. Verdoorn, P. J., J. J. Post andS. S. Goslinga,The 1969 Re-estimation of the Annual Model, Central Planning Bureau, The Hague, 1970.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Van Loo, P.D. A monetary submodel for the dutch economy: Some preliminary results. De Economist 122, 89–128 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680100

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01680100

Keywords

Navigation