Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound study of bonein vitro

  • Session VII
  • Published:
Calcified Tissue International Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Ultrasound has been investigated as a tool for characterizing the biomechanical competence of bone. The rationale for using ultrasound rests on two points. First, its interaction with tissues can be used to measure their density, velocity, and structure, and thus to characterize the elasticity and to infer the strength of bone. Second, ultrasound may be used to characterize tissue properties over a wide range of spatial dimensions and organizational levels, ranging from its constituents (e.g., trabeculae for cancellous bone) to the entire organ. Different ultrasound techniques can be used to investigate diverse bone properties, but two techniques have emerged as having the potential for providing useful information on problems of current biomedical interest. These measure two parameters, density and velocity, which correlate with the elastic and ultimate properties of bone. In particular, the elasticity E is formally related to the product of density and velocity squared, E = ϱv2. Moreover, it has been shown by mechanical testing that there is a single linear correlation between elasticity and strength at all orientations, both in cortical and in cancellous bone, materials with a strong intrinsic anisotropy. At the tissue level, it may therefore be expected that the ultrasound parameters will prove to be useful predictors of bone strength and of its dependence on orientation.In vitro ultrasound studies have shown that these properties can be measured specifically and quantitatively, and that they vary under different physiological conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Currey JD (1970) The mechanical properties of bone. Clin Orthop Rel Res 73:210–231

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hayes WC, Gerhart TN (1985) Biomechanics of bone: applications for assessment of bone strength. In: Peck WA (ed) Bone and mineral research. Elsevier Science Publishers, BV

  3. Heaney RP (1989) Osteoporotic fracture space: a hypothesis. Bone Miner 6:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goss SA, Johnston RL, Dunn F (1978) Comprehensive compilation of empirical ultrasonic properties of mammalian tissues. J Acoust Soc Am 64:423–457

    Google Scholar 

  5. Theismann H, Pfander F (1949) Uber die Durchlassigkeit des Knochens fur Ultraschall. Strahlentherapie 80:607–610

    Google Scholar 

  6. Anast GT, Fields T, Siegel IM (1958) Ultrasonic technique for the evaluation of bone fractures. Am J Phys Med 37:157–159

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen AB, Ammitzboll F, Dyrbye C, Cornelissen M, Cornelissen P, Van der Perre G (1986) Assessment of tibial stiffness by vibration testing in situ—I. Identification of mode shapes in different supporting conditions. J Biomech 19(1):53–60

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cornelissen P, Cornelissen M, Dan der Perre G, Christensen AB, Ammitzboll F, Dyrbye C (1986) Assessment of tibial stiffness by vibration testing in situ—II. Influence of soft tissues, joints and fibula. J Biomech 19(7):551–561

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cornelissen M, Cornelissen P, Van der Perre G, Christensen AB, Ammitzboll F, Dyrbye C (1987) Assessment of tibial stiffness by vibration testing in situ—III. Sensitivity of different modes and interpretation of vibration measurements. J Biomech 20(4):333–342

    Google Scholar 

  10. Abendschein W, Hyatt GW (1970) Ultrasonics and selected physical properties of bone. Clin Orthop 69:294–301

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yoon HS, Katz JL (1976) Ultrasonic wave propagation in human cortical bone—II. Measurements of elastic properties and microhardness. J Biomech 9:459–464

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ashman RB, Cowin SC, Van Buskirk WC, Rice JC (1984) A continuous wave technique for the measurement of the elastic properties of cortical bone. J Biomech 17:349–361

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jeffcott LB, McCartney RN (1985) Ultrasound as a tool for assessment of bone quality in the horse. Vet Rec 116:337–342

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ashman RB, Corin JD, Turner CH (1987) Elastic properties of cancellous bone: measurement by an ultrasonic technique. J Biomechan 20:979–986

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ashman RB, Rho JY (1988) Elastic modulus of trabecular bone material. J Biomech 21:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  16. Turner CH, Eich M (1991) Ultrasonic velocity as a predictor of strength in bovine cancellous bone. Calcif Tissue Int 49:116–119

    Google Scholar 

  17. Geusens P, Nijs J, Van der Perre G et al. (1992) Longitudinal effect of tiludronate on bone mineral density, resonant frequency, and strength in monkeys. J Bone Miner Res 7:599–609

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chandra K, Thompson C (1990) On ultrasound scattering from bone tissue. Ann Intern Conf of the IEEE Eng in Med and Biology Society 12:1400–1401

    Google Scholar 

  19. Langton CM, Palmer SB, Porter RW (1984) The measurement of broadband ultrasonic attenuation in cancellous bone. Eng Med 13:89–91

    Google Scholar 

  20. McKelvie ML, Fordham J, Clifford C, Palmer SB (1989) In vitro comparison of quantitative computed tomography and of broadband ultrasonic attenuation of trabecular bone. Bone 10:101–104

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCloskie EV, Murray SA, Charlesworth D, et al. (1990) Assessment of broadband ultrasound attenuation in the os calcis in vitro. Clin Sci 78:221–225

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rice JC, Cowin SC, Bowman JA (1988) On the dependence of the elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density. J Biomech 21:155–168

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lakes R, Yoon HS, Katz JL (1985) Ultrasonic wave propagation and attenuation in wet bone. J Biomed Eng 8:143–148

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lees S, Cleary PF, Gariepy EF (1979) Distribution of sonic plesio-velocity in a compact bone sample. J Acoust Soc Am 66:641–647

    Google Scholar 

  25. Lees S (1986) Sonic properties of mineralized tissues. In: Greenleaf JF (ed), Tissue characterization with ultrasound, vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, pp 207–226

    Google Scholar 

  26. Whiting JF (1977) Ultrasonic critical angle reflection goniometer for in vivo bone mineral analysis. In: White D, Brown RE (eds), Ultrasound in medicine. Plenum, New York, pp 1629–1643

    Google Scholar 

  27. Antich PP, Anderson JA, Ashman RB, Dowdey JE, Gonzales J, Murry RC, Zerwekh JE, Pak CYC (1991) Measurement of mechanical properties of bone material in vitro by ultrasound reflection: methodology and comparison with ultrasound transmission. J Bone Miner Res 6:417–426

    Google Scholar 

  28. Katz JL, Meunier A (1987) The elastic anisotropy of bone. J Biomech 20:1063–1070

    Google Scholar 

  29. Zimmerman MC, Meunier A, Katz JL, Christel P (1990) The evaluation of cortical bone remodeling with a new ultrasonic technique. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 37(5):433–441

    Google Scholar 

  30. Zimmerman MC, Meunier A, Katz JL, Christel P, and Sedel L (1989) The evaluation of bone remodeling about orthopaedic implants with ultrasound. J Orthop Res 7(4):607–611

    Google Scholar 

  31. Lees S, Hanson DB (1992) Effect of fluoride dosage on bone density, sonic velocity and longitudinal modulus of rabbit femora. Calcif Tissue Int 50:88–92

    Google Scholar 

  32. Turner CH, Akhter MP, Heaney RP (1992) The effects of fluoridated water on bone strength. J Orthop Res 10:581–587

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wright LL, Glade MJ, Gopal J (1987) The use of transmission ultrasound to assess bone status in the human newborn. Pediatric Res 22:541–544

    Google Scholar 

  34. Heaney RP, Avioli LV, Chestnut CH, Lappe J, Recker RR, Brandenburger GH (1989) Osteoporotic bone fragility: detection by ultrasound transmission velocity. JAMA 261:2986–2989

    Google Scholar 

  35. Antich PP, Pak CYC, Gonzales J, Anderson JA, Sakhaee K, Rubin C (1993) Measurement of intrinsic bone quality in vivo by reflection ultrasound: correction of impaired quality with slow release sodium fluoride and calcium citrate. J Bone Miner Res 8(3):301–311

    Google Scholar 

  36. Zerwekh JE, Antich PP, Sakhaee K, Gonzales J, Gottschalk F, Pak CYC (1991) Assessment by reflection ultrasound method of the effect of intermittent slow-release sodium fluoride-calcium citrate therapy on material strength of bone. J Bone Miner Res 6:239–244

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zerwekh JE, Antich PP, Sakhaee K, Prior J, Gonzales J, Gottschalk F, Pak CYC (1992) Lack of deleterious effect of slow-release sodium fluoride treatment on cortical bone histology and quality in osteoporotic patients. Bone Miner 18:65–76

    Google Scholar 

  38. Antich PP, Boivin G, Meunier PJ, Gonzales J, Anderson J, Prior J, Zerwekh JE, Pak CYC (1992) Dependence of bone quality, mineral density and fluoride content on the mode of fluoride administration. J Bone Miner Res 7(1):S198

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Antich, P.P. Ultrasound study of bonein vitro . Calcif Tissue Int 53 (Suppl 1), S157–S161 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01673428

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01673428

Key words

Navigation