Skip to main content
Log in

Etappenlavage: Advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fastener, and Velcro® analogue for temporary abdominal closure

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Etappenlavage is defined as a series of planned multiple operative procedures performed at a 24-hour interval. It includes a commitment to reexplore the patient's abdomen at the initial corrective operation. This is a report of a prospective study of 117 patients treated by etappenlavage for severe advanced suppurative peritonitis in 2 institutions. Etappenlavage was performed in 15% of all patients with operations for peritonitis. In these patients, the abdominal infection had progressed to an advanced stage of severe functional impairment. A total of 669 laparotomies were performed and the abdomen closed temporarily utilizing retention sutures (n=45), a simple zipper (n=26), a slide fastener (n=29), and Velcro® analogue (n=17). An average of 6.1 procedures were necessary to control the infection. In 57% of the patients, additional complications were recognized and repaired after the initial operation. Patients were artificially ventilated for an average of 17 days. The median duration of therapy was 33 (range, 3–183) days. Twenty-eight patients died between days 3 and 71 (median, 9) after initiation of therapy. In 88%, uncomplicated wound healing was observed after wounds were closed definitely. In the last 17 patients, no complications were attributable to the use of 2 adhesive sheets of polyamide plus nylon or perlon for temporary abdominal closure (Velcro®-like artificial burr). APACHE II scoring predicted a median mortality of 47%. The actual mortality was 25%. Overall, the mortality of advanced diffuse peritonitis was reduced from a predicted 34–93% (APACHE II/SIS scoring) to 24%. Velcro® analogue (artificial burr) was the most practical device for temporary abdominal closure.

Résumé

L'etappenlavage est défini comme une série d'interventions répétées à intervalles de 24 heures. Cette technique implique une nouvelle exploration de l'abdomen lors de l'intervention initiale. Dans ce travail, nous rapportons les résultats chez 117 patients étudiés prospectivement traités par l'etappenlavage pour péritonite sévère dans 2 institutions. L'etappenlavage a été effectuée chez 15% des patients ayant une péritonite. Chez ces patients, l'infection abdominale avait évolué et comportait une défaillance fonctionnelle avancée. On a pratiqué 669 laparotomies et la fermeture pariétale provisoire a nécessité des sutures sur bourdonnets (n=45), une fermeture éclair (n=26), un fermoir à glissière (n=29), et des Velcro® équivalent (n=17). En moyenne, on a réopéré ces patients 6.1 fois pour contrôler l'infection. Chez 57% des patients on a mis en évidence des complications supplémentaires qui ont requis une réparation secondaire. La ventilation artificielle était nécessaire environ 17 jours. La durée moyenne du traitement à ventre ouvert a été de 33 (3–183) jours. Vingt-huit patients sont morts entre jour 3 et 71 (médiane, 9 jours) après la première laparotomie. La plaie abdominale a cicatrisé sans problème chez 88% des patients après fermeture définitive. Chez les 17 autres patients, on a utilisé 2 feuillets adhésifs de polyamide mélangé soit à du fil de nylon soit à du perlon, rapprochés avec un Velcro®. La mortalité médiane prévisible avec le score APACHE II était de 47%. La mortalité réelle était de 25%. La mortalité de la péritonite diffuse avancée a été réduite depuis un score combiné (APACHE II/SIS) de 34–93% à 24%. La fermeture temporaire par Velcro® équivalent s'est avérée la plus pratique.

Resumen

Se define el etappenlavage como una serie de procedimientos operatorios múltiples que se realizan cada 24 horas para el tratamiento de la sepsis intraabdominal avanzada. La definición implica el compromiso de reexplorar el abdomen diariamente después de la operación inicial. El presente artículo informa los resultados de un estudio prospectivo sobre 117 pacientes tratados mediante etappenlavage por peritonitis supurativa en 2 instituciones. Se realizó etappenlavage en 15% de todos los pacientes operados por peritonitis, aquellos en quienes la infección abdominal había progresado hasta un estado de severa alteración funcional. En total se realizaron 669 laparotomías y el abdomen fue cerrado temporalmente utilizando suturas de retención (n=45), un zipper simple (n=26), un cierre de lámina plástica (n=29), o una lámina de plástico adhesivo (Velcro® equivalente, n=17). Fue necesario realizar un promedio de 6.1 procedimientos para lograr el control de la infección. En 57% de los casos se reconocieron y corrigieron complicaciones adicionales después de la operación inicial. Los pacientes fueron sometidos a ventilación mecánica por un promedio de 17 días. El promedio de duración del regimen terapéutico fue de 33 (rango, 3–183) días; 28 pacientes murieron entre los 3 y los 71 días (promedio, 9) después del inicio del regimen terapéutico. Cicatrización libre de complicaciones ocurrió en 88% de los casos una vez que las heridas fueron cerradas en forma definitiva. En los últimos 17 pacientes el cierre temporal del abdomen fue efectuado mediante el uso de 2 láminas adhesivas de nylon o perlon (Velcro®); no se hallaron complicaciones que pudieran ser atribuíbles a este método. La aplicación del método APACHE II para establecer el grado de severidad de la enfermedad predijo una tasa de mortalidad promedio de 47%; la tasa real de mortalidad fue de 25%. La tasa global de mortalidad de la peritonitis difusa avanzada fue reducida de una tasa predecible de 34–93% (APACHE II/SIS) a 24%. El Velcro® equivalente probó ser el aditamento mas útil para el cierre temporal de la laparotomía.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kirschner, M.: Die Behandlung der akuten eitrigen freien Bauchfellentzündung. Langenbecks Arch. Klin. Chir.142:53, 1926

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wittmann, D.H.: Zur Therapie der Bauchfellentzündung. Habilitation, Hamburg University, 1984

  3. Wittmann, D.H., Aprahamian, C., Bergstein, J.M.: A temporary device for abdominal closure. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet. (submitted for publication)

  4. Nyström, P.-O.: Proposed definitions for diagnosis, severity scoring, stratification, and outcome for trials on intraabdominal infection. World J. Surg.14:148, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wittmann, D.H., Teichmann, W., Müller, M.: Development and validation of the peritonitis-index-Altona (PIA II). Langenbecks Arch. Chir.372:834, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wittmann, D.H., Teichmann, W., Frommelt, L.: The impact of intraabdominal pathogens on treatment of purulent peritonitis. (German). Chirurg56:363, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wittmann, D.H., Schassan, H.H.: Penetration of eight ss-lactam antibiotics into the peritoneal fluid. Arch. Surg.118:205, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wittmann, D.H., Teichmann, W.: Therapy for pathogenic bacteria in diffuse peritonitis by scheduled relaparotomies. Langenbecks Arch. Chir.366:629, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fry, D.E., Pearlstein, L., Fulton, R.L., Polk, Jr., H.C.: Multiple systems organ failure: The role of uncontrolled infection. Arch. Surg.115:136, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  10. Schoentag, J.J., Plat, M.E., Cerra, F.B., Wells, P.B., Walzak, P., Bucklay, R.: Aminoglycoside nephrotoxicity in critically ill surgical patients. J. Surg. Res.26:270, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pujol, J.P.: La non fermature des incisions abdominales d'urgence. Techniques et rèsultats. Thesis, Paris, U.E.R. X Bichat, 1975

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mastboom, W.J.B., Kuypers, H.H.C., Schoots, F.J., Wobbes, T.: Small-bowel perforation complicating the open treatment of generalized peritonitis. Arch. Surg.124:689, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schein, M., Saadia, R., Decker, G.G.A.: The open management of the septic abdomen. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.163:587, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  14. Levy, E.: Principles of surgery for diffuse peritonitis. Management of the abdominal wall. (French). Ann. Chir.39:547, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fagniez, P.L.: La prèvention des lèsions intestinales lors de èviscerations. Nouv. Presse Mèd.7:1117, 1978

    Google Scholar 

  16. Goris, R.J.A.: Ogilvie's method applied to infected wound disruption. Arch. Surg.115:1103, 1980

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schmitt, H.J., Grinnan, G.L.B.: Use of Marlex mesh in infected abdominal war wounds. Am. J. Surg.113:825, 1967

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wouters, D.B., Krom, R.A.F., Slooff, M.J.H., Kootstra, G., Kuijjer, P.J.: The use of Marlex mesh in patients with generalized peritonitis and multiple organ system failure. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.156:609, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pichlmayr, R., Lehr, L., Pahlow, J., Guthy, E.: Postoperative kontinuierliche dorso-ventrale Bauchspülung bei schweren Formen der Peritonitis. Chirurg54:299, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schein, M., Saadia, R., Decker, G.G.A.: The open management of the septic abdomen. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.163:587, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maddaus, M.A., Simmons, R.L.: Leave the abdomen open for peritonitis: Yes, no, maybe? Adv. Surg.21:1, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  22. Hay, J.M., Duchatelle, P., Elman, A., Flamant, Y., Maillard, J.N.: The abdomen left open. (French). Chirurgie105:508, 1979

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sakai, L., Daake, J., Kaminski, D.L.: Acute perforation of sigmoid diverticuli. Am. J. Surg.142:12, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wittmann, D.H., Teichmann, W., Adam, D., Rubinstein, E., Eggert, A.: A new method of measuring the protein unbound fraction of antibiotics in the peritoneal cavity. Prog. and Abstr. 21st Interscience Conf. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemother., Am. Soc. Microbiol., Abstr. 102, 1981

  25. Teichmann, W., Wittmann, D.H., Andreone, P.A.: Scheduled reoperations (etappenlavage) for diffuse peritonitis. Arch. Surg.121:147, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  26. Teichmann, W., Eggert, A., Wittmann, D.H., Böcker, W.: Der Reissver-schluss als neue Methode des temporären Bauchdeckenverschlusses in der Abdominalchirurgie. Chirurg56:173, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  27. Kerremans, R., Penninckx, F., Lauwers, P., Ferdinande, F.: Mortality of diffuse peritonitis patients reduced by planned relaparotomies. In Infektion-Sepsis-Peritoonitis, P. Lawin, U. Hartenauer, editors, Stuttgart, Georg Thieme Verlag, 1982, pp. 104–107

    Google Scholar 

  28. Penninckx, F.M., Kerremans, R.P., Lauwers, P.M.: Planned relaparotomies in the surgical treatment of severe generalized peritonitis from intestinal origin. World J. Surg.7:762, 1983

    Google Scholar 

  29. Strauss, A.A.: A new method and end results in the treatment of carcinoma of the stomach and rectum by surgical diathermy. J. Am. Med. Assoc.106:285, 1936

    Google Scholar 

  30. Leguit, P.: Zip-closure of the abdomen. Neth. J. Surg.34:40, 1982

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stone, H.H., Strom, P.R., Mullins, R.J.: Pancreatic abscess management by subtotal resection and packing. World J. Surg.8:340, 1984

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cullen, D.J., Coyle, J.P., Teplick, R., Long, M.C.: Cardiovascular, pulmonary, and renal effects of massively increased intraabdominal pressure in critically ill patients. Crit. Care Med.17:118, 1989

    Google Scholar 

  33. Condon, R.E.: Management of the acute complications of diverticular disease. Dis. Colon Rectum19:296, 1976

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bruchard, K.W., Ciombor, D.M., McLeod, M.K., Slothman, G.J., Gann, D.S.: Postive end expiratory pressure with increased intraabdominal pressure. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.161:313, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  35. Garcia-Sabrido, J.L., Quintans, A., Polo, J.R.: ado peritoneal postoperatorio continuo (LPPC) enperitonitis de alto riesgo (PAR). Cir. Esp.39:73, 1985

    Google Scholar 

  36. Heddrich, G.S., Wexler, M.J., McLean, A.P.H., Meakins, J.L.: The septic abdomen: Open management with Marlex mesh with a zipper. Surgery99:399, 1986

    Google Scholar 

  37. Lazarou, S.A., Barbul, A., Wasserkrug, H.L., Efron, G.: The wound is a possible source of post-traumatic immune suppression. Prog. 9th Annual Mtg. Surg. Infection Soc., Denver, Colorado, 1989

  38. Wittmann, D.H., Müller, M.: The PIAII Score for intra-abdominal infections. In Workbook of International Congress on Intraabdominal Infections, Cheshire, Adelphi Communications, Macclesfield, 1987, pp. 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  39. Trede, M., Linder, M.M., Wesh, G.: Die Indikation zur Relaparotomie bei postoperativer Peritonitis. Langenbecks Arch. Chir.352: 295, 1983

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Formerly of Hamburg, Federal Republic of Germany.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wittmann, D.H., Aprahamian, C. & Bergstein, J.M. Etappenlavage: Advanced diffuse peritonitis managed by planned multiple laparotomies utilizing zippers, slide fastener, and Velcro® analogue for temporary abdominal closure. World J. Surg. 14, 218–226 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664876

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01664876

Keywords

Navigation