Skip to main content
Log in

Mesentericocaval shunt (MCS) with autologous jugular vein

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We report our personal experience of 114 patients with portal hypertension treated with mesentericocaval shunt (MCS) and 167 with portocaval anastomosis (PCA). In addition, the 2 procedures were evaluated in a controlled trial of 21 MCS patients and 25 PCA patients. We found no significant difference in the results of the 2 operations in terms of operative mortality rate, incidence of hepatic encephalopathy, and long-term survival. The surgical procedure of MCS is no easier to perform than PCA; it requires the preparation of the graft, 2 vascular anastomoses, and longer operative time. It seems appropriate to select this operation only with those patients who, for anatomical reasons, cannot undergo PCA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. De Martel, M.F.: A propos d'un cas de fistule d'Eck. Rev. Chir.42:1181, 1910

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lozzi, V.: L'anastomosi fra cava inferiore e vena mesenterica superiore nelle ostruzioni croniche della vena porta. Rinascita Med.31:371, 1937

    Google Scholar 

  3. Valdoni, P.: Meine Erfharungen in der Behandlung des Portales Überdrucks. Helv. Chir. Acta21:442, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  4. Marion, P.: Traitement chirurgical de l'hypertension portale. Helv. Med. Acta21:375, 1954

    Google Scholar 

  5. Clathworthy, H.S., Wall, T., Watman, R.N.: A new type of portal-to systemic venous shunt for portai hypertension. Arch. Surg.71:588, 1955

    Google Scholar 

  6. De Resende-Alvies, J.B.: Operacao de escholha no tratamento de hypertensions portal. J. Bras. Cir.2:1061, 1962

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drapanas, T.: Interposition mesocaval shunt for treatment of portal hypertension. Ann. Surg.176:435, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  8. Stipa, S., Thau, A., Toscano, M., Rossi, P.: Lo shunt-mesenterico-cava con vena giugulare interna. Policlinico-Sez. Chir.77:196, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  9. Stipa, S., Thau, A., Cavallaro, A., Rossi, P.: A technique for mesenterico-caval shunt. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.137:285, 1973

    Google Scholar 

  10. Stipa, S., Ziparo, V., Anza, M., Fabrini, G.F., Lupino, R.: A randomized controlled trial of mesenterico-caval shunt with autologous jugular vein. Surg. Gynecol. Obstet.153:353, 1981

    Google Scholar 

  11. Voorhees, A.B., Jr., Price, J.B., Jr., Britton, R.C.: Portasystemic shunting procedures for portal hypertension. Am. J. Surg.119:501, 1970

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cutler, S.J., Ederer, F.: Maximum utilization of the life table method in analyzing survival. J. Chron. Dis.8:699, 1958

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fulenwider, J.T., Nordlinger, B.M., Millikan, W.J., Sones, P.J., Warren, W.D.: Portal perfusion an angiographic illusion. Ann. Surg.189:257, 1979

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stipa, S., Ziparo, V. Mesentericocaval shunt (MCS) with autologous jugular vein. World J. Surg. 8, 702–705 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655766

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01655766

Keywords

Navigation