Skip to main content
Log in

Geometry of quantum states

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the first part of this work, an attempt of a realistic interpretation ofquantum logic is presented. Propositions of quantum logic are interpreted as corresponding to certain macroscopic objects called filters; these objects are used to select beams of particles. The problem of representing the propositions as projectors in a Hilbert space is considered and the classical approach to this question due to Birkhoff and von Neumann is criticized as neglecting certain physically important properties of filters. A new approach to this problem is proposed.

The second part of the paper contains a revision of the concept of a state in quantum mechanics. The set of all states of a physical system is considered as an abstract space with a geometry determined by the transition probabilities. The existence of a representation of states by vectors in a Hilbert space is shown to impose strong limitations on the geometric structure of the space of states. Spaces for which this representation does not exist are called non-Hilbertian. Simple examples of non-Hilbertian spaces are given and their possible physical meaning is discussed. The difference between Hilbertian and non-Hilbertian spaces is characterized in terms of measurable quantities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dirac, P. A. M.: Principles of quantum mechanics. Oxford: Clarendon Press 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Birkhoff, G.: Lattice theory, New York: Am. Math. Soc. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  3. —— Ann. Math.36, 743–748 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  4. ——, andJ. von Neumann: Ann. Math.37, 823–843 (1936).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mackey, G. W.: The mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. New York: W. A. Benjamin Inc. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jauch, J. M., andC. Piron: Helv. Phys. Acta36, 827–837 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Piron, C.: Helv. Phys. Acta37, 439–468 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Finkelstein, D., J. M. Jauch, S. Schimonowich, andD. Speiser: Foundations of quaternionic quantum mechanics. J. Math. Phsy.3, 207 (1962); — Some physical consequences of general Q-covariance. J. Math. Phys.4, 788 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Finkelstein, D.: The logic of quantum physics. N. Y. Acad. Sci.1963, 621–637.

  10. Schwinger, J.: Quantum mechanics (Lectures at the Summer School, Les Houches, 1955).

  11. Pool, J. C. T.: Simultaneous observability and the logic of quantum mechanics, Univ. of Iowa, Ph. D. thesis, Department of Physics Report No. 12.

  12. Ramsay, A.: J. Math. Mech.15, 277 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gunson, J.: Commun. Math. Phys.4, 262 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mielnik, B. Geometry of quantum states. Commun.Math. Phys. 9, 55–80 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01654032

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01654032

Keywords

Navigation