Skip to main content
Log in

Cardiovascular parameters and scoring systems in the evaluation of response to therapy in sepsis and septic shock

Herz-Kreislauf-Parameter und Score-Systeme in der Beurteilung des Therapieerfolges bei Sepsis und septischem Schock

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

In 47 medical and postoperative ICU patients with 57 episodes of sepsis and septic shock, cardiovascular parameters including systemic vascular resistance (SVR), cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SVI), left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) as well as six scoring systems (APACHE II, Elebute, Goris, HIS, SAPS and SSS) were studied regarding their usefulness in the assessment of disease progression and evaluation of response to supplemental sepsis therapy (immunoglobulins, plasmapheresis). Among the hemodynamic parameters, only a prompt SVR improvement significantly discriminated between ultimate survivors and nonsurvivors. Thus, an increase in SVR (>160 dyn*cm−5*sec, within days 0 to 4, persisting for >24 hours) can serve as a prognostically validated “response” criterion (responders/non-responders: 26/31; mortality: 27% vs. 77%). Non-invasively, the APACHE II score was best suited (specificity: 88%, sensitivity: 67%) to classify hemodynamically defined responders to supplemental sepsis treatment (score-reduction ≥4 on day 4 after onset of therapy).

Zusammenfassung

Bei 47 internistischen sowie postoperativen Intensivpatienten mit insgesamt 57 Episoden von Sepsis und septischem Schock wurden Herz-Kreislauf-Parameter inklusive systemischer Gefäßwiderstand (SGW), Herzindex, Schlagvolumenindex und linksventrikulärer Schlagarbeitsindex sowie sechs Score-Systeme (APACHE II, Elebute, Goris, HIS, SAPS und SSS) in ihrer Wertigkeit zur Beurteilung des Krankheitsverlaufes sowie des Ansprechens auf additive Sepsistherapie (Immunglobuline, Plasmapherese) untersucht. Von den hämodynamischen Parametern diskriminierte nur der — prompt nachweisbare — Anstieg des SGW signifikant zwischen letztlich überlebenden und nicht überlebenden Patienten. Ein Anstieg des SGW (>160 dyn*cm−5*s innerhalb von vier Tagen, länger als 24 Stunden anhaltend) kann somit als prognostisch validiertes „Responder“-Kriterium dienen (Responder/Non-Responder: 26/31; Letalität: 27% vs. 77%). Nichtinvasiv erwies sich der APACHE II Score (Kriterium: Score-Abfall ≥4 bis zum Tag 4 nach Therapiebeginn) zur Klassifizierung der hämodynamisch definierten Therapie-„Responder“ bei additiver Sepsistherapie am besten geeignet (Spezifität: 88%, Sensitivität 67%).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dellinger, E. P. Use of scoring systems to assess patients with surgical sepsis. Surg. Clin. North America 68 (1988) 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fink, P. C., Erdmann, R., Schöndube, F., Baca, I. Leucocytes, neutrophilia and elastase-α1-proteinase-inhibitor-complex: marker of different validity for monitoring the perioperative infection risk. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.): Progress in clinical and biological research, Second Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 308. Alan R. Liss, New York 1989, pp. 695–700.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pilz, G., Stäblein, A., Reuschel-Janetschek, E., Autenrieth, G., Werdan, K. The use of scoring systems in patients with cardiogenic and septic shock. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.). Progress in clinical and biological research, Second Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 308. Alan R. Liss, New York 1989, pp. 625–631.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kipping, N., Grundmann, R., Hornung, M., Wesoly, C. Efficiency of sepsis score, AT III- and endotoxin evaluation in predicting the prognosis of postoperative sepsis in the intensive care unit. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.). Progress in clinical and biological research, Second Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 308. Alan R. Liss, New York 1989, pp. 637–642.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dominioni, L., Dionigi, R., Zanello, M., Monico, R., Cremaschi, R., Dionigi, R., Ballabio, A., Massa, M., Comelli, M., Dal Ri, P., Pisati, P. Sepsis score and acute-phase protein response as predictors of outcome in septic surgical patients. Arch. Surg. 122 (1987) 141–146.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Redl, G., Zadrobilek, E., Schindler, I., Mauritz, W., Sporn, P. Judgement of central haemodynamics with and without Swan Ganz catheter in septic shock states. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.). Progress in clinical and biological research, First Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 236-B Monitoring and treatment of shock. Alan R. Liss, New York 1987, pp. 123–128.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knaus, W. A., Wagner, D. P., Draper, E. A. The value of measuring severity of disease in clinical research on acutely ill patients. J. Chron. Dis. 37 (1984) 455–463.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wilson, R. F., Thal, A. P., Kindling, P. H., Grifka, T., Ackerman, E. Hemodynamic measurements in septic shock. Arch. Surg. 91 (1965) 121–129.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Winslow, E. J., Loeb, H. S., Rahimtoola, S. H., Kamath, S., Gunnar, R. M. Hemodynamic studies and results of therapy in 50 patients with bacteremic shock. Am. J. Med. 54 (1973) 421–432.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parker, M. M., Parillo, J. E. Septic shock: hemodynamics and pathogenesis. JAMA 250 (1983) 3324–3327.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Parker, M. M., Shelhamer, J. H., Bacharach, S. L., Green, M. V., Natanson, C., Frederick, T. M., Damske, B. A., Parillo, J. E. Profound but reversible myocardial depression in patients with septic shock. Ann. Int. Med. 100 (1984) 483–490.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abraham, E., Bland, R. D., Cobo, J. C., Shoemaker, W. C.: Sequential cardiorespiratory patterns associated with outcome in septic shock. Chest (1984) 75–80.

  13. Baumgartner, J. D., Vaney, E., Perret, C. An extreme form of the hyperdynamic syndrome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 10 (1984) 245–249.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Parker, M. M., Shelhamer, J. H., Natanson, C., Alling, D. W., Parillo, J. E. Serial cardiovascular variables in survivors and nonsurvivors of human septic shock: heart rate as an early predictor of prognosis. Crit. Care Med. 15 (1987) 923–929.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Groeneveld, A. B. J., Bronsveld, W., Thijs, L. G. Hemodynamic determinants of mortality in human septic shock. Surgery 99 (1986) 140–152.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Artucio, H., Digenio, A., Pereyra, M. Left ventricular function during sepsis. Crit. Care Med. 17 (1989) 323–327.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lenz, K., Laggner, A., Druml, W., Graninger, G., Grimm, G., Schneeweiß, B. Hemodynamic characterization of sepsis. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.): Progress in clinical and biological research, First Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 236-B Monitoring and treatment of shock. Alan R. Liss, New York 1987, pp. 129–138.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tuchschmidt, J., Fried, J., Swinney, R., Sharma, O. P. Early hemodynamic correlates of survival in patients with septic shock. Crit. Care Med. 17 (1989) 719–723.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goris, R. J. A., Boekhorst, T. P. A.:Nuytinck, J. K. S., Gimbrere, J. S. F. Multiple organ failure: generalized autodestructive inflammation? Arch. Surg. 120 (1985) 1109–1115.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cerra, F. B. The systemic septic response: Multiple systems organ failure. Crit. Care Clin. 1 (1985) 591–607.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Elebute, E. A., Stoner, H. B. The grading of sepsis. Br. J. Surg. 70 (1983) 29–31.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Stevens, L. E. Gauging the severity of surgical sepsis. Arch. Surg. 118 (1983) 1190–1192.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Knaus, W. A., Draper, E. A., Wagner, D. P., Zimmerman, J. E. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit. Care Med. 13 (1985) 818–829.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Lehmkuhl, P., Jeck-Thole, S., Pichlmayr, I. A new scoring system for disease intensity in a surgical intensive care unit. World J. Surg. 13 (1989) 252–258.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Le Gall, J. R., Loirat, P., Alperovitch, A., Glaser, P., Granthill, C., Mathieu, D., Mercier, P., Thomas, R., Villers, D. A simplified acute physiology score for ICU patients. Crit. Care Med. 12 (1984) 975–977.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bone, R. C., Fisher, C. J., Clemmer, T. P., Slotman, G. J., Metz, C. A., Balk, R. A., andThe Methylprednisolone Severe Sepsis Study Group A controlled clinical trial of high-dose methylprednisolone in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N. Engl. J. Med. 317 (1987) 653–658.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Hinshaw, L., Peduzzi, P., Young, E., Sprung, C., Shatney, C., Sheagren, J., Wilson, M., Haakenson, C., andThe Veterans Administration Systemic Sepsis Cooperative Study Group Effect of high-dose glucocorticoid therapy on mortality in patients with clinical signs of sepsis. N. Engl. J. Med. 317 (1987) 659–665.

    Google Scholar 

  28. DeMaria, A., Heffernan, J. J., Grindlinger, G. A., Craven, D. E., McIntosh, T. K., McCabe, W. R. Naloxone versus placebo in treatment of septic shock. Lancet i (1985) 1363–1365.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Just, H.-M., Metzger, M., Vogel, W., Pelka, R. B. Therapeutic effects of immunoglobulin in intensive care patients with severe infections. Klin. Wochenschr. 64 (1986) 245–256.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Haque, K. N., Zaidi, M. H., Haque, S. K., Bahakim, H., El-Hazmi, M., El-Swailam, M. Intravenous immunoglobulin for prevention of sepsis in preterm and low birth weight infants. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 5 (1986) 622–625.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sidiropoulos, D., Boehme, U., von Muralt, G., Morell, A., Barandun, S. Immunoglobulin supplementation in prevention or treatment of neonatal sepsis. Pediatr. Infect. Dis. 5 (1986) 193–194.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Class, I., Junginger, W., Klöss, T. Pseudomonas immune globulin in surgical intensive care patients on mechanical ventilation. Infection 15 (1987) Suppl. 2, S76-S70.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Fomsgaard, A., Baek, L., Fomsgaard, J. S., Engquist, A. Preliminary study on treatment of septic shock patients with antilipopolysaccharide IgG from blood donors. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 21 (1989) 697–708.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ziegler, E. J., McCutchan, J. A., Fierer, J., Glauser, M. P., Sadoff, J. C., Douglas, H., Braude, A. I. Treatment of gram-negative bacteremia and shock with human antiserum to a mutantEscherichia coli. N. Engl. J. Med. 307 (1982) 1225–1230.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Baumgartner, J.-D., McCutchan, J. A., van Melle, G., Vogt, M., Luethy, R., Glauser, M. P., Ziegler, E. J., Klauber, M. R., Muehlen, E., Chiolero, R., Geroulanos, S. Prevention of gram-negative shock and death in surgical patients by antibody to endotoxin core glycolipid. Lancet ii (1985) 60–63.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Werdan, K., Bauriedel, G., Samtleben, W., Banthien, F. C. A., Haberl, R., Hacker, H., Roth, P., Schultheiß, H. P., Gurland, H. J., Autenrieth, G. Beeinflussung des septischen Schocks durch Plasmapherese. In:Deutsch, E., Druml, W., Kleinberger, G., Ritz, R., Schuster, H. P. (eds.): Akutes Nierenversagen und extrakorporale Therapieverfahren. Aktuelle Intensivmedizin 3. Schattauer, Stuttgart 1986, pp. 429–437.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Bjertnaes, L. J. Plasma exchange in septic shock. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.): Progress in clinical and biological research, First Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 236-B Monitoring and treatment of shock. Alan R. Liss, New York 1987, pp. 215–223.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Montgomery, A. B., Stager, M. A., Carrico, C. J., Hudson, L. D. Causes of mortality in patients with the adult respiratory distress syndrome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 132 (1985) 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Swan, H. J. C., Ganz, W., Forrester, J., Marcus, H., Diamond, G., Chonette, D. Catherization of the heart in man with use of a flow directed balloon-tipped catheter. N. Engl. J. Med. 283 (1970) 447–451.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Suffredini, A. F., Fromm, R. E., Parker, M. M., Brenner, M., Kovacs, J. A., Wesley, R. A., Parrillo, J. E. The cardiovascular response of normal humans to the administration of endotoxin. N. Engl. J. Med. 321 (1989) 280–287.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Teasdale, G., Jennett, B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet ii (1974) 81–84.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Jacobs, S., Chang, R. W. S., Lee, B. One year's experience with the Apache II severity of disease classification system in a general intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 42 (1987) 738–744.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Youden, W. J. Index for rating diagnostic tests. Cancer 3 (1950) 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Hanley, J. A., McNeil, B. J. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143 (1982) 29–36.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Quale, J. M., Mandel, L. J., Bergasa, N. V., Straus, E. W. Clinical significance and pathogenesis of hyperbilirubinemia associated withStaphylococcus aureus septicemia. Am. J. Med. 85 (1988) 615–618.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Bohnen, M. A., Mustard, R. A., Oxholm, S. E., Schouten, D. APACHE II score and abdominal sepsis. Arch. Surg. 123 (1988) 225–229.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Moreau, R., Soupison, T., Vauquelin, P., Derrida, S., Beaucour, H., Sicot, C. Comparison of two simplified severity scores (SAPS and APACHE II) for patients with acute myocardial infarction. Crit. Care Med. 17 (1989) 409–413.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jacobs, S., Chang, R. W. S., Lee, B., Lee, B. Audit of intensive care: a 30-month experience using the Apache II severity of disease classification system. Intens. Care Med. 14 (1988) 567–574.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Moser, K. H., Bouillon, B., Troidl, H., Köppen, L. Validation of Continuous APACHE Score (CAPS) for a better prediction of outcome in surgical ICU patients. Theor. Surg. 3 (1989) 192–197.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Hopefl, A. W., Taaffe, C. L., Herrmann, V. M. Failure of APACHE II alone as a predictor of mortality in patients receiving total parenteral nutrition. Crit. Care Med. 17 (1989) 414–417.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Larvin, M., McMahon, M. J. APACHE-II score for assessment and monitoring of acute pancreatitis. Lancet ii (1989) 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Giangiuliani, G., Mancini, M., Gui, D. Validation of a severity of illness score (APACHE II) in a surgical intensive care unit. Intens. Care Med. 15 (1989) 519–522.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Machin, D., Campbell, M. J. Statistical tables for the design of clinical trials. Blackwell Sc. Publ., Oxford 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Pilz, G., Gurniak, T., Bujdoso, O., Werdan, K.: A basic program for calculation of APACHE II and Elebute scores and sepsis evaluation in intensive care medicine. Comput. Biol. Med., submitted for publication.

  55. Calandra, T., Glauser, M., Schellekens, J., Verhoef, J., andthe Swiss-Dutch J5 Immunoglobulin Study Group Treatment of gramnegative septic shock with human IgG antibody toEscherichia coli J5: a prospective, double blind, randomized trial. J. Infect. Dis. 158 (1988) 312–319.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Werdan, K., Pilz, G., Kääb, S. Haemodynamic effects during treatment of sepsis and septic shock with immunoglobulins and plasmapheresis. In:Schlag, G., Redl, H. (eds.). Progress in clinical and biological research, Second Vienna Shock Forum, Vol. 308. Alan R. Liss, New York 1989, pp. 1025–1030.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilz, G., Werdan, K. Cardiovascular parameters and scoring systems in the evaluation of response to therapy in sepsis and septic shock. Infection 18, 253–262 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646996

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646996

Keywords

Navigation