Skip to main content
Log in

Einige Bemerkungen zur Zustandsänderung von relativistischen quantenmechanischen Systemen durch Messungen und zur Lokalitätsforderung

  • Published:
Communications in Mathematical Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A description of relativistic quantum mechanical systems is introduced, in which the states depend on the possible information of the observer. The possibility of information is limited by Einstein-causality for classical systems (

). Observables belonging to measurements in finite regions of the Minkowskispace have a degenerate spectrum. The measurement of such an observable leads to a mixture; for the description of such a mixture we use a proposal first made byLüders (

). We assume the locality condition for the observables (ℒ), this means the commutativity of two observables measured in two relatively space-like regions. The main result is the equivalence of (ℒ), (

), (

) on the one side and (

) and (

) on the other side. (

) is the Einstein-causality including quantum mechanical systems. The idealisation of a measurement as a point event is used for the derivation of this result.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literatur

  1. Siehe z. B.Wightman, A. S.: Problèmes mathématiques de la théorie quantique des champs. Vorlesungsausarbeitung. Paris 1958.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Siehe z. B.Wightman, A. S.: Introduction to some aspects of the relativistic dynamics of quantized fields. Lectures at the French Summer School of Theoretical Physics, Cargèse, Corsica 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Siehe z. B.Haag, R., andD. Kastler: An algebraic approach to quantum field theory. J. Math. Phys.5, 848–861 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Araki, H.: On the algebra of all local observables. Progr. Theoret. Phys. (Kyoto)32, 844–854 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guenin, M., andB. Misra: On the von Neumann algebras generated by field operators. Nuovo Cimento30, 1272–1290 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haag, R., andD. Kastler: In [3].

    Google Scholar 

  7. Reeh, H., u.S. Schlieder: Bemerkungen zur Unitäräquivalenz von Lorentzinvarianten Feldern. Nuovo Cimento22, 1051–1068 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borchers, H. J.: On the structure of the algebra of field operators. Nuovo Cimento24, 214–236 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  9. ——, andW. Zimmermann: On the self-adjointness of field operators. Nuovo Cimento31, 1047–1059 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Siehe z. B.Feynman, R. P.: Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics. Phys. Rev.76, 769–789 (1949).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Wightman, A. S.: In [2].

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jost, R., u.K. Hepp: Matrixelemente des Translationsoperators. Helv. Phys. Acta35, 34–46 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lüders, G.: Über die Zustandsänderung durch den Meßprozeß. Ann. Physik 6. Folge Bd. 8, 322–328 (1951).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Siehe z. B.Süssmann, G.: Über den Meßvorgang. Abhandl. Bayer. Akad. Wiss. Math.-Naturw. Kl. 1958.

  15. Wigner, E. P.: The problem of measurement. Am. J. Phys,31, 6–15 (1963).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jauch, J. M.: The problem of measurement in quantum mechanics. Helv. Phys. Acta37, 293–316 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scheibe, E.: Die kontingenten Aussagen in der Physik. Frankfurt am Main und Bonn: Athenäum-Verlag 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Einstein, A., B. Podolsky, andN. Rosen: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete? Phys. Rev.47, 777–780 (1935).

    Google Scholar 

  19. z. B.Bell, J. S.: On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. Physics1, 195 to 200 (1964).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bohm, D., andY. Aharonov: Discussion of experimental proof for the paradox ofEinstein, Rosen, andPodolsky. Phys. Rev.108, 1070–1076 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  21. z. B.Wightman, A. S.: Note on polarization effects of Compton scattering. Phys. Rev.74, 1813–1817 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  22. z. B.Nishijima, K.: Fundamental particles. New York and Amsterdam: W. A. Benjamin Inc. 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Day, T. B.: Demonstration of quantum mechanics in the large. Phys. Rev.121, 1204–1206 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  24. z. B.Neumann, J. v.: Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Kap. VI. 1. Berlin: Julius Springer 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gelfand, I. M., u.N. J. Wilenkin: Verallgemeinerte Funktionen, Bd. IV. Berlin: Deutscher Verlag der Wissenschaften 1964.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Licht, A. L.: Superposition of local states. Bull. Am. Phys. Soc.10, no.1, 47 (1965); siehe auch 20.

    Google Scholar 

  27. —— Local states. J. Math. Phys.7, 1656–1669 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Schlieder, S. Einige Bemerkungen zur Zustandsänderung von relativistischen quantenmechanischen Systemen durch Messungen und zur Lokalitätsforderung. Commun.Math. Phys. 7, 305–331 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646663

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01646663

Navigation