Skip to main content
Log in

The functional results after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for severe constipation (Arbuthnot Lane's disease) as related to rectal sensory function

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rectoanal manovolumetry during graded isobaric rectal distension was carried out in 12 women with severe constipation classified as slow transit constipation (Arbuthnot Lane's disease). The resting anal sphincter pressure, the rectoanal inhibitory reflex and the rectal capacity were all normal. While thedistension volumes required to elicit sensation of rectal filling and an urge to defaecate were within normal limits in all patients thedistension pressures required to elicit such sensations fell outside the 95% limits of variation of control subjects in 4 patients. All patients were subsequently subjected to colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis. Patients with normal rectal sensory function had a satisfactory functional result after colectomy, whereas the four patients with blunted sensation did not improve. These findings suggest that rectoanal manovolumetry with determination of the distension pressures required to elicit rectal sensation is an important preoperative measure to be used in patients with severe constipation for selection of patients suitable for colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith B (1973) Pathological changes in the colon produced by anthraquinone purgatives. Dis Colon Rectum 16:455–458

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krishnamurthy S, Schuffler MD, Rohrmann CA, Popell CE (1985) Severe idiopathic constipation is associated with a distinctive abnormality of the colonic myenteric plexus. Gastroenterology 88:26–34

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hinton JM, Lennard-Jones JE (1968) Constipation: definition and classification. Postgrad Med J 55:720–723

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes ESR, McDermott FT, Johnson WR, Polglase AL (1981) Surgery for constipation. Aust NZ Surg 51:144–151

    Google Scholar 

  5. Watier A, Devroede G, Duvanceau A, Alderrahman M, Dugnay C, Forand MC, Tétreault L, Arhan P, Lamarche J, Elhilali M (1983) Constipation with colonic inertia. A manifestation of systemic disease? Dig Dis Sci 28:1025–1033

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goligher JC (1984) Surgery of the anus, rectum and colon, 5th edn. Balliére — Tindall London, pp 335–345

    Google Scholar 

  7. Preston DM, Hawley PR, Lennard-Jones JE, Todd IP (1984) Results of colectomy for severe idiopathic constipation in women (Arbuthnot Lane's disease). Br J Surg 71:547–552

    Google Scholar 

  8. Poisson J, Devroede G (1983) Severe chronic constipation as a surgical problem. Surg Clin North Am 63:193–213

    Google Scholar 

  9. Preston DM, Lennard-Jones JE (1986) Severe chronic constipation of young women: idiopathic slow transit constipation. Gut 27:41–48

    Google Scholar 

  10. Roe AM, Bartolo DCC, Mortensen NJMcC (1986) Diagnosis and surgical management of intractable constipation. Br J Surg 73:854–861

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fasth S, Hedlund H, Svaninger G, Öresland T, Hultén L (1983) Functional results after subtotal colectomy and caecorectal anastomosis. Acta Chir Scand 149:623–627

    Google Scholar 

  12. Abrahamsson H, Antov S (1987) Gastrointestinal transit time (GITT) in constipated patients evaluated by a single abdominal radiogram. Scand J Gastroent 22 [Suppl 135]: 55

    Google Scholar 

  13. Åkervall S, Fasth S, Hultén L, Nordgren S, Öresland T (in press) Rectoanal manovolumetry — a new method for investigation of anorectal function. Gut

  14. Read NW, Timms JM, Barfield LJ, Donnelly TC, Bannister JJ (1986) Impairment of defecation in young women with severe constipation. Gastroenterology 90:55–60

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lanfranchi GA, Bazzocchi G, Campieri M, Brijnola C, Fois F, Marzio L, Labo J (1984) Intestinal transit time is related with different ano-rectal motility patterns in chronic non-organic constipation. In: Ramon C (ed) Gastrointestinal motility. MTP Press: Lancaster, pp 477–481

    Google Scholar 

  16. Penninckx FM, Mebis JH, Kerremans RP (1982) The rectoanal reflex in cats analyzed in vitro. Scand J Gastroenterol 17 [Suppl 71]: 147–149

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hurst AF (1911) The sensibility of the alimentary canal. Goalstonian Lectures. Frowde, London Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  18. Baldi F, Ferrarini F, Corinaldesi R, Balestra R, Cassan M, Fenati GP, Barbara L (1982) Function of the internal anal sphincter and rectal sensitivity in idiopathic constipation. Digestion 24:14–22

    Google Scholar 

  19. Garry RC (1933) Responses to stimulation of the caudal end of the large bowel in the cat. J Physiol 78:208

    Google Scholar 

  20. Lane RHS, Parks AG (1977) Function of the anal sphincters following colo-anal anastomosis. Br J Surg 64:596–599

    Google Scholar 

  21. Goligher JC, Hughes ESR (1951) Sensibility of the rectum and colon, its role in the mechanism of anal incontinence. Lancet 1:543–548

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Åkervall, S., Fasth, S., Nordgren, S. et al. The functional results after colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis for severe constipation (Arbuthnot Lane's disease) as related to rectal sensory function. Int J Colorect Dis 3, 96–101 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645313

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01645313

Keywords

Navigation