Skip to main content
Log in

Moxalactam and piperacillin: A study of in vitro characteristics and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients

Moxalactam und Piperacillin: In vitro-Charakteristika und Pharmakokinetik bei Karzinompatienten

  • Originalia
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

We evaluated the microbiologic characteristics including MIC determinations, synergy plate assays and serum bactericidal activity for two regimens being examined as empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients. The regimens consisted of moxalactam (4 g i.v. q12h) plus piperacillin (75 mg/kg i.v. q6h) or moxalactam (as above) plus amikacin (levels adjusted to one hour post-infusion levels of 25 mg/l and troughs of 6–8 mg/l). Detailed pharmacokinetics were ascertained for the beta lactams. All drugs were active against a panel of 11 strains each ofEscherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, andStaphylococcus aureus. The pharmacokinetic profile showed serum levels sufficient to provide good antimicrobial activity throughout the dosing interval. Both regimens displayed synergistic or partially synergistic activity in the main for the test organisms; moxalactam plus piperacillin produced good results againstS. aureus andP. aeruginosa. In the serum bactericidal assays, the moxalactam-piperacillin combination produced significantly higher mean titers at both peak and trough when compared to the moxalactam-amikacin regimen. This may be because moxalactam acts as a beta lactamase inhibitor for both staphylococcal beta lactamase, as well as the Sabath-Abraham Id type beta lactamase carried byP. aeruginosa (among others). Moxalactam-piperacillin deserves extensive evaluation as empiric therapy for the febrile neutropenic cancer patients.

Zusammenfassung

Wir untersuchten die mikrobiologischen Charakteristika mit MHK-Bestimmungen, Synergismus-Plattentests und Serumbakterizidie von zwei Therapieregimen, die für die empirische Antibiotikatherapie bei granulozytopenischen Krebspatienten mit Fieber geprüft wurden. Die Therapieschemata bestanden aus Moxalactam (4 g i.v. alle 12 Stunden) plus Piperacillin (75 mg/kg i.v. alle 6 Stunden) oder Moxalactam (wie oben) plus Amikacin (Anpassung der Serumspiegel auf 25 mg/l eine Stunde nach der Infusion und Talspiegel 6–8 mg/l). Für die β-Lactam-Antibiotika wurden detaillierte pharmakokinetische Bestimmungen durchgeführt. Alle Medikamente waren gegen eine Gruppe von jeweils 11 Stämmen vonEscherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa undStaphylococcus aureus wirksam. Das pharmakokinetische Profil zeigte Serumspiegel, die für eine gute antimikrobielle Aktivität während des gesamten Dosierungsintervalls ausreichten. Beide Therapieschemata wiesen synergistische oder teilweise synergistische Aktivität für die wesentlichen Testorganismen auf. Moxalactam plus Piperacillin zeigte auch gute Ergebnisse in der Aktivität gegenS. aureus undP. aeruginosa. Im Serum-Bakterizidie-Test zeigte die Kombination Moxalactam-Piperacillin im Mittel signifikant höhere Titer zum Zeitpunkt der Spitzen- und Talspiegel als die Kombination Moxalactam-Amikacin. Möglicherweise ist dies darauf zurückzuführen, daß Moxalactam sowohl die Staphylokokken-β-Lactamase hemmt als auch die β-Lactamase vom Sabath-Abraham-Typ Id, die (unter anderen)P. aeruginosa trägt. Umfangreiche Studien zur Kombination Moxalactam-Piperacillin für die empirische Therapie bei neutropenischen Karzinompatienten mit Fieber sind gerechtfertigt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. de Jongh, C. A., Wade, J. C., Schimpff, S. C., Newman, K. A., Finley, R. S., Salvatore, P. C., Moody, M. R., Standiford, H. C., Fortner, C. L., Wiernik, P. H.: Empiric antibiotic therapy for suspected infection in granulocytopenic cancer patients: a comparison between the combination of moxalactam plus amikacin and ticarcillin plus amikacin. Am. J. Med. 73 (1982) 89–96.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Wade, J. C., Schimpff, S. C., Newman, K. A., Fortner, C. L., Standiford, H. C., Wiernik, P. H. Piperacillin or ticarcillin plus amikacin: a double-blind prospective comparison of empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile granulocytopenic cancer patients. Am. J. Med. 71 (1981) 983–990.

    Google Scholar 

  3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Standard methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria which grow aerobically. Proposed standard M7-P. Villanova, Pennsylvania, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Elion, G. B., Swiger, S., Witchings, G. H. Antagonists of nucleic acid derivatives. J. Biol. Chem. 208 (1954) 477–488.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Murillo, J., Standiford, H. C., Schimpff, S. C., Tatem, B. A. Comparison of serum bactericidal aotivity among three antimicrobial combinations. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 992–996.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miner, D. J., Coleman, D. L., Shepherd, A. M. M., Hardin, T. C. Determination of moxalactam in human body fluids by liquid chromatographic and microbiological methods. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 8 (Suppl.) (1981) 227–231.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, C. B., Koup, J. R., Opheim, K. E., Adelman, L. A., Levy, J., Stull, T. L., Clausen, C., Smith, A. L. Piperacillin pharmacokinetics in pediatric patients. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 22 (1982) 442–447.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Metzler, C. M., Elfring, G. K., McEwen, A. J. A package of computer programs for pharmacokinetic modeling. Biometrics 30 (1974) 562–563.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gibaldi, M., Perrier, D. Pharmacokinetics. Dekker, New York 1975, pp. 45–128.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Loo, J. C. K., Riegelman, S. Assessment of pharmacokinetic constants from postinfusion blood curves obtained after i.v. infusion. J. Pharm. Sci. 59 (1970) 53–55.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jelliffe, R. W., Jelliffe, S. M. A computer program for estimation of creatinine clearance from unstable serum creatinine levels, age, sex, and weight. Math. Biosci. 14 (1972) 17–24.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lau, W. K., Young, L. S., Black, R. E., Winston, D. J., Linne, S. R., Weinstein, R. J., Hewitt, W. L. Comparative efficacy and toxicity of amikacin/carbenicillin versus gentamicin/carbenicillin in leukopenic patients: a randomized prospective trial. Am. J. Med. 62 (1977) 959–966.

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Jongh, C., Joshi, J., Newman, K., Danhauer, F., Finley, R., Moody, M., Wiernik, P., Schimpff, S.: Moxalactam plus piperacillin or amikacin: empiric antibiotic therapy for febrile, neutropenic cancer patients. Presented at the 22nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Miami Beach, Florida, 1982-a, Abstract 943.

  14. Kuch, N. A., Testa, R. T., Forbes, M. In vitro andin vivo antibacterial effects of combinations of beta-lactam antibiotics. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 19 (1981) 634–638.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kurtz, T. O., Winston, D. J., Bruckner, D. A., Martin, W. J. Comparativein vitro synergistic activity of new beta-lactam antimicrobial agents and amikacin againstPseudomonas aeruginosa andSerratia marcescens. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 20 (1981) 239–243.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Anderson, E. T., Young, L. S., Hewitt, W. L. Antimicrobial synergism in the therapy of gram-negative rod bacteremia. Chemotherapy 24 (1978) 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Klastersky, J., Cappel, R., Daneau, D. Clinical significance ofin vitro synergism between antibiotics and gram-negative infections. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2 (1972) 470–475.

    Google Scholar 

  18. de Jongh, C., Newman, K., Moody, M., Wharton, R., Schimpff, S.: Synergism and response in gram-negative bacteremia among granulocytopenic cancer patients. Presented at the 22nd Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, Miami Beach, Florida, 1982-b, Abstract 495.

  19. Bergan, T., Williams, J. D. Dose dependence of piperacillin pharmacokinetics. Chemotherapy 28 (1982) 153–159.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Standiford, H. C., Drusano, G. L., McNamee, W. B., Tatem, B., Ryan, P. A., Schimpff, S. C. Comparative pharmacokinetics of moxalactam, cefoperazone, and cefotaxime in normal volunteers. Rev. Infect. Dis. 4 Suppl. (1982) S 585-S 594.

    Google Scholar 

  21. DeSante, K. A., Israel, K. S., Brier, G. L., Wolny, J. D., Hatcher, B. L. Effect of probenecid on the pharmacokinetics of moxalactam. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 21 (1982) 58–61.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Klastersky, J., Didier, D., Swings, G., Weerts, D. Antibacterial activity in serum and urine as a therapeutic guide in bacterial infections. J. Infect. Dis. 129 (1974) 187–193.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bush, K., Sykes, R. B. Beta-lactamase inhibitors in perspective. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 11 (1983) 97–107.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Winston, D. J., Barnes, R. C., Ho, W. G., Young, L. S., Champlin, R. E., Gale, R. P. Moxalactam plus piperacillin versus moxalactam plus amikacin in febrile granulocytopenic patients. Am. J. Med. 77 (1984) 442–450.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Drusano, G.L., Schimpff, S.C., de Jongh, C. et al. Moxalactam and piperacillin: A study of in vitro characteristics and pharmacokinetics in cancer patients. Infection 13, 20–26 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643616

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01643616

Keywords

Navigation