Summary
We studied thein vitro activity of ciprofloxacin against 570 strains of ampicillin-resistantEnterobacteriaceae and 286Pseudomonas aeruginosa strains. 95.26% of theEnterobacteriaceae and 53.45% of theP. aeruginosa were inhibited by 0.1 mg/l of ciprofloxacin. 2 mg/l of ciprofloxacin inhibited all of theEnterobacteriaceae strains and 4 mg/l all of theP. aeruginosa. We compared the activity of ciprofloxacin with that of temocillin in theEnterobacteriaceae strains. In theP. aeruginosa strains, classified according to their susceptibility to carbenicillin and gentamicin, we compared the activity of ciprofloxacin with that of ceftazidime. In the strains studied, thein vitro activity of ciprofloxacin is superior to that of temocillin against theEnterobacteriaceae and to that of ceftazidime against theP. aeruginosa strains.
Zusammenfassung
Es wurde die Wirksamkeitin vitro von Ciprofloxacin bei 570 Ampicillin-resistentenEnterobacteriaceae- und 286Pseudomonas aeruginosa-Stämmen untersucht. 95,26% derEnterobacteriaceae- und 53,45% derP. aeruginosa-Stämme wurden mit 0,1 mg/l Ciprofloxacin gehemmt. 2 mg/l von Ciprofloxacin hemmten alleEnterobacteriaceae-Stämme und 4 mg/l alleP. aeruginosa-Stämme. Bei denEnterobacteriaceae-Stämmen wurde die Wirksamkeit von Ciprofloxacin mit der von Temocillin verglichen. Bei den nach Carbenicillin- und Gentamicin-resistenten Isolaten klassifiziertenP. aeruginosa-Stämmen verglichen wir die Aktivität von Ciprofloxacin und Ceftazidim. Bei den den untersuchtenEnterobacteriaceae-Stämmen ist die Wirksamkeit von Ciprofloxacinin vitro höher als die von Temocillin und bei denP. aeruginosa-Stämmen höher als die von Ceftazidim.
Literature
Gadebusch, H. H., Shungu, D. L., Weinberg, E., Chung, S. K. Comparison of the antibacterial activity of norfloxacin (MKO366, AM715), a new organic acid, with that of other orally absorbed chemotherapeutic agents. Infection 10 (1982) 41–44.
Matsumoto, J. I., Miyamoto, T., Minamida, A., Nishimura, Y., Egawa, H., Nishimura, H. Structure-activity relationships of 4-oxo-1,8-naphthyridine-3-carboxylic acids including AT-2266, a new oral antipseudomonal agent. In:Nelson, J. D., Grassi, C. (eds.): Current chemotherapy and infectious disease. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, D.C. 1980, p. 454.
Sato, K., Matsuura, Y., Inoue, M., Une, T., Osada, Y., Ogawa, H., Mitsuhashi, S. In vitro andin vivo activity of DL-8280, a new oxazine derivative. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 22 (1982) 548–553.
Bauernfeind, A., Petermüller, C. In vitro activity of ciprofloxacin, norfloxacin and nalidixic acid. Eur. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2 (1983) 111–115.
Wise, R., Andrews, J. M., Edwards, L. J. In vitro activity of BAYo 9867, a new quinoline derivative, compared with those of other antimicrobial agents. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 23 (1983) 559–564.
Chin, N., Neu, H. C.: Thein vitro activity of BAYo 9867, a new quinoline antimicrobial agent. 83rd Annual Meeting of the ASM, 1983, 4 (A-18).
Park, C. H., López, J. S., Cook, C. B. Acidimetric agar plate method for ampicillin susceptibility testing ofHaemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 13 (1978) 318–320.
Lucas, T. J. An evaluation of 12 methods for the demonstration of penicillinase. J. Clin. Pathol. 32 (1979) 1061–1065.
Richmond, M. H., Sykes, R. B. The β-lactamase of gram-negative bacteria and their possible physiological role. Adv. Microb. Physiol. 9 (1973) 31–88.
Matthew, M., Harris, A. M., Marshall, M. J., Ross, G. W. The use of analytical isoelectric focusing for detection and identification of β-lactamases. J. Gen. Microbiol. 88 (1975) 169–178.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Roy, C., Foz, A., Segura, C. et al. Activity of ciprofloxacin (BAYo 9867) against pseudomonas aeruginosa and ampicillin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. Infection 11, 326–328 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01641358
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01641358