Skip to main content
Log in

General survey of trimethoprim combinations in the treatment of urinary tract infections

Allgemeine Übersicht über Trimethoprim-Kombinationen in der Behandlung von Harnwegsinfektionen

  • Clinical Evaluation
  • Published:
Infection Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The properties of trimethoprim (TM), reviewed here, show it to be an excellent antimicrobial agent in its own right. However, with very few exceptions, TM has been made available clinically only in combination with a sulphonamide, usually sulphamethoxazole (SMX). We present evidence to suggest that the decision so to restrict the availability of TM was mistaken. Synergy between TM and SMX can be shown clearly in vitro, but there is no evidence from clinical trials that it plays a significant therapeutic role in urinary infections. Also, there is no evidence that combining the two antibiotics suppresses the emergence of resistance. Recently, sulphonamides other than SMX have been proposed as partners for TM, mainly on pharmacokinetic grounds. Compounds other than sulphonamides may also be logical partners for TM: we have made extensive studies on TM + rifampicin, for instance, and have obtained excellent results in certain clearly-defined patient groups. Only clinical trials of these new combinations will reveal whether they are superior to TM/SMX. There is already sufficient evidence to suggest that TM alone will be as effective as, and more acceptable than, TM/SMX. We propose that further large-scale clinical trials with TM alone be carried out, both to treat acute urinary infections and in prophylaxis.

Zusammenfassung

Die hier besprochenen Eigenschaften von Trimethoprim (TM) zeigen, daß es für sich allein ein vorzügliches antimikrobielles Mittel ist. Jedoch ist TM mit sehr wenigen Ausnahmen klinisch nur in Verbindung mit einem Sulfonamid, für gewöhnlich Sulfamethoxazol (SMX) zur Verfügung gestellt worden. Wir stellen Faktoren vor, aus denen geschlossen werden kann, daß es falsch war, die Verfügbarkeit von TM so einzuschränken. Der Synergismus zwischen TM und SMX kann in vitro eindeutig nachgewiesen werden, doch gibt es aus klinischen Untersuchungen keine Beweise dafür, daß er bei Harnwegsinfektionen eine wesentliche therapeutische Rolle spielt. Auch kann nicht bewiesen werden, daß die Kombination der beiden Antibiotika die Resistenzentwicklung vermindert. In jüngerer Zeit wurden vorwiegend aus pharmakokinetischen Gründen andere Sulfonamide als SMX als Partner für TM vorgeschlagen. Außer Sulfonamiden können auch andere Verbindungen sinnvolle Partner für TM sein. Wir haben beispielsweise ausgedehnte Untersuchungen an TM + Rifampicin durchgeführt und bei bestimmten klar umrissenen Patientengruppen ausgezeichnete Ergebnisse erzielt. Nur klinische Untersuchungen über diese neuen Kombinationen werden klären, ob sie dem TM/SMX überlegen sind. Es gibt bereits genügend Belege für die Annahme, daß TM allein ebenso wirksam sein wird wie TM/SMX und zugleich zufriedenstellender. Wir machen den Vorschlag, daß weitere umfangreiche klinische Versuche mit TM allein zur Behandlung von akuten Harnwegsinfektionen und zur Prophylaxe durchgeführt werden.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature

  1. Hitchings, G. H. Species differences among dihydrofolate reductases as a basis for chemotherapy. Postgrad. Med. J. 45 Suppl. (1969) 7–10.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Waterworth, P. M. Practical aspects of testing sensitivity to trimethoprim and sulphonamide. Postgrad. Med. J. 45 Suppl. (1969) 21–27.

    Google Scholar 

  3. McAllister, T. A., Alexander, J. G., Dulake, C., Percival, A., Boyce, J. M. H., Wormald, P. J. Multicentric study of sensitivities of urinary tract pathogens. Postgrad. Med. J. 47 Suppl. (1971) 7–14.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lewis, E. L., Lacey, R. W. Present significance of resistance to trimethoprim and sulphonamides in coliforms,Staphylococcus aureus, andStreptococcus faecalis. J. Clin. Pathol., 26 (1973) 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fruensgaard, K., Korner, B. Alterations in the sensitivity pattern after use of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole für two years in the treatment of urinary tract infections. Chemotherapy 20 (1974) 97–101.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ortel, S. Trimethoprim resistance of pathogenic organisms previous to common clinical use of sulprim®. Proc. 9th Int. Congress Chemoth. 6 (1974) 353–358.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Grüneberg, R. N. Susceptibility of urinary pathogens to various antimicrobial substances: a four-year study. J. Clin. Pathol. 29 (1976) 292–295.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Grey, D., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., Brumfitt, W.: Incidence and mechanisms of resistance to trimethoprim in clinically isolated Gram-negative bacteria. Chemotherapy (1979) (in press).

  9. Grey, D., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. Trimethoprim-resistant bacteria: cross-resistance patterns. Microbios 19 (1977) 45–54.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jobanputra, R. S., Datta, N. Trimethoprim R-factors in enterobacteria from clinical specimens. J. Med. Microbiol. 7 (1974) 169–177.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Amyes, S. G. B., Smith, J. T. The purification and properties of the trimethoprim-resistant dihydrofolate reductase mediated by the R-factor, R 388. Eur. J. Biochem. 61 (1976) 597–603.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Maskell, R., Okubadejo, O. A., Payne, R. H., Pead, L. Human infections with thymine-requiring bacteria. J. Med. Microbiol. 11 (1978) 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Smith, H. W., Tucker, J. F. The virulence of trimethoprim-resistant thymine-requiring strains ofSalmonella. J. Hyg. (Cambridge) 76 (1976) 97–108.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Amyes, S. G. B., Smith, J. T. Thymineless mutants and their resistance to trimethoprim. J. Antimicr. Chemother. 1 (1975) 85–89.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz, D. E., Rieder, J. Pharmacokinetics of sulfamethoxazole + trimethoprim in man and their distribution in the rat. Chemotherapy 15 (1970) 337–355.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Nolte, H., Buttner, H. Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim and its combination with sulfamethoxazole in man after single and chronic oral administration. Chemotherapy 18 (1973) 274–284.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz, D. E., Vetter, W., Englert, G. Trimethoprim metabolites in rat, dog and man: Qualitative and quantitative studies. Arzneim.-Forsch. 20 (1970) 1867–1871.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brumfitt, W., Faiers, M. C., Pursell, R. E., Reeves, D. S., Turnbull, A. R. Bacteriological, pharmacological and clinical studies with trimethoprim-sulphonamide combinations, with particular reference to the treatment of urinary infections. Postgrad. Med. J. 45 Suppl. (1969) 56–61.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kaplan, S. A., Weinfeld, R. E., Abruzzo, C. W., McFaden, K., Jack, M. L., Weissman, L. Pharmacokinetic profile of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole in man. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 128 (1973) S547-S555.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Welling, P. G., Craig, W. A., Amidon, G. L., Kunin, C. M. Pharmacokinetics of trimethoprim and sulfamethoxazole in normal subjects and in patients with renal failure. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 128 (1973) S556-S566.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bach, M. C., Gold, O., Finland, M. Absorption and urinary excretion of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole: Results with single doses in normal young adults and preliminary observations during therapy with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. J. Infect. Dis. 128 (1973) S584-S598.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Raeburn, J. A. A method for studying antibiotic concentrations in inflammatory exudate. J. Clin. Pathol. 24 (1971) 633–635.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Symposium: Antibiotic tissue concentration, determination and significance. Infection 4 Suppl. (1976) S79-S170.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Gillett, A. P., Wise, R. Penetration of four cephalosporins into tissue fluid in man. Lancet 1 (1978) 962–964.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Rieder, J., Schwartz, D. E., Fernex, M., Bergan, T., Brodwall, E. K., Blumberg, A., Cottier, P., Scheitlin, W. Pharmacokinetics of the antibacterial combination sulfamethoxazole plus trimethoprim in patients with normal or impaired kidney function. Antibiot. Chemother. 18 (1974) 148–198.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kremers, P., Duvivier, J., Heusghem, C. Pharmacokinetic studies of co-trimoxazole in man after single and repeated doses. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 14 (1974) 112–117.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Grey, D., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., Brumfitt, W.: Combined action of sulphamethoxazole and trimethoprim against clinically-isolated sulphonamide-resistant bacteria. Chemotherapy (1979) (in press).

  28. Stokes, A., Lacey, R. W. Effect of thymidine on activity of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole. J. Clin. Pathol. 31 (1978) 165–171.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Brumfitt, W., Pursell, R. Double-blind trial to compare ampicillin, cephalexin, co-trimoxazole, and trimethoprim in treatment of urinary infection. Br. Med. J. 2 (1972) 673–676.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hoigné, R., Muller, U., Schneider, H. R. A comparison of chemotherapy in patients with urinary tract infections using trimethoprim alone and in combination with sulfamethoxazole (Gantanol). Proc. 6th Int. Congr. Chemoth. 1 (1970) 971–974.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Böhni, E. Co-trimoxazole in sulfonamide-resistant infections. Proc. 8th Int. Congr. Chemoth. 2 (1974) 204–210.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Acar, J. F., Goldstein, F., Chabbert, Y. A. Synergistic activity of trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole on Gram-negative bacilli: observations in vitro and in vivo. J. Infect. Dis. Suppl. 128 (1973) S470-S477.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., Brumfitt, W. Clinical aspects of in vitro antimicrobial synergism: In:Mouton, R. P., Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T. (ed): The rational choice of antibacterial agents. Bohn, Scheltema & Holkema, Utrecht, 1977, p89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lewis, E. L., Anderson, J. D., Lacey, R. W. A reappraisal of the antibacterial action of cotrimoxazole in vitro. J. Clin. Pathol. 27 (1974) 87–91.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Anderson, J. D., Lacey, R. W., Lewis, E. L., Sellin, M. A. Failure to demonstrate an advantage in combining sulphamethoxazole with trimethoprim in an experimental model of urinary infection. J. Clin. Pathol. 27 (1974) 619–622.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Knothe, H. The effect of a combined preparation of trimethoprim and sulphamethoxazole following short-term and long term administration on the flora of the human gut. Chemotherapy 18 (1973) 285–296.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Toivanen, A., Kasanen, A., Sundquist, H., Toivanen, P. Effect of trimethoprim on the occurrence of drug-resistant coliform bacteria in the faecal flora. Chemotherapy 22 (1976) 97–103.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Symposium: Nevin® — Supristol®. Arzneim.-Forsch. 26 (1976) 595–684.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Bergan, T., Vik-Mo, H., Anstad, U. Kinetics of a sulfadiazine-trimethoprim combination. Clin. Pharmacol. Therapeut. 22 (1977) 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Nabert-Bock, V. G., Grims, H. Bakteriologie des Chemotherapeutikums Sulfametrol-Trimethoprim. Vergleich mit Co-trimoxazol. Arzneim.-Forsch. 27 (1977) 1109–1117.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Brumfitt, W.: Rifampicin synergism — the use of rifampicin in combination with trimethoprim and other antibiotics. Symposium on Anonymous Mycobacteria and Use of Rifampicin in the Treatment of Infectious Diseases, Hook, 1978.

  42. Sourander, L. B., Werner, G. E. Efficacy and tolerance of sulphonamide-trimethoprim combinations in geriatric patients with bacteriuria. Proc. 5th Int. Congr. Chemoth. 5 (1967) 199–211.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Koch, U. J., Schumann, K. P., Kuchler, R., Kewitz, H. Efficacy of trimethoprim, sulfamethoxazole and the combination of both in acute urinary tract infection. Chemotherapy 19 (1973) 314–321.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kasanen, A., Toivanen, P., Sourander, L., Kaarsalo, E., Anataa, S. Trimethoprim in the treatment and long-term control of urinary tract infection. Scand. J. Infect. Dis. 6 (1974) 91–96.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Kasanen, A., Kaarsalo, E., Hiltunen, R., Soini, V. Comparision of long-term, low-dosage nitrofurantoin, methenamine hippurate, trimethoprim and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in the control of recurrent urinary tract infection. Ann. Clin. Res. 6 (1974) 285–289.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Männistö, P. T. Comparison of oxolinic acid, trimethoprim and trimethoprim-sulphamethoxazole in the treatment and long-term control of urinary tract infection. Curr. Ther. Res. 20 (1976) 645–654.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Kunin, C. M., Craig, W. A., Uehling, D. T. Trimethoprim therapy for urinary tract infection. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 239 (1978) 2588–2590.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J. M. T., Grey, D. Trimethoprim-resistant coliforms. Lancet 2 (1977) 926.

    Google Scholar 

  49. O'Grady, F., Fry, I. K., McSherry, A., Cattell, W. R. Long-term treatment of persistent or recurrent urinary tract infection with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. J. Inf. Dis. 128 (1973) S652-S656.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Towner, K. J., Pearson, N. J., Cattell, W. R., O'Grady, F. Chromosomal resistance to trimethoprim. Lancet 1 (1978) 1371.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brumfitt, W., Hamilton-Miller, J.M.T. General survey of trimethoprim combinations in the treatment of urinary tract infections. Infection 7 (Suppl 4), S388–S393 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01639018

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01639018

Keywords

Navigation