Skip to main content
Log in

CONLIN: An efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts

  • Originals
  • Published:
Structural optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Convex Linearization method (CONLIN) exhibits many interesting features and it is applicable to a broad class of structural optimization problems. The method employs mixed design variables (either direct or reciprocal) in order to get first order, conservative approximations to the objective function and to the constraints. The primary optimization problem is therefore replaced with a sequence of explicit approximate problems having a simple algebraic structure. The explicit subproblems are convex and separable, and they can be solved efficiently by using a dual method approach.

In this paper, a special purpose dual optimizer is proposed to solve the explicit subproblem generated by the CONLIN strategy. The maximum of the dual function is sought in a sequence of dual subspaces of variable dimensionality. The primary dual problem is itself replaced with a sequence of approximate quadratic subproblems with non-negativity constraints on the dual variables. Because each quadratic subproblem is restricted to the current subspace of non zero dual variables, its dimensionality is usually reasonably small. Clearly, the Hessian matrix does not need to be inverted (it can in fact be singular), and no line search process is necessary.

An important advantage of the proposed maximization method lies in the fact that most of the computational effort in the iterative process is performed with reduced sets of primal variables and dual variables. Furthermore, an appropriate active set strategy has been devised, that yields a highly reliable dual optimizer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Braibant, V.; Fleury, C. 1985: An approximation concepts approach to shape optimal design.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 53, 119–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Braibant, V.; Geradin, M. 1985: Optimum path planning of robot arms.LTAS Report RA-2, University of Liége, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1979: Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 14, 1761–1783

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1982: Reconciliation of mathematical programming and optimality criteria approaches to structural optimization. In: Morris, A.J. (ed.)Foundations of structural optimization: a unified approach pp. 363–404. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1987: Computer aided optimal design of elastic structures. In: Mota Soares, C.A. (ed.)Computer aided optimal design: structural and mechanical systems, pp. 832–900. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C. 1986: Shape optimal design by the convex linearization method. In: Bennett, J.; Botkin, M. (eds.)The optimum shape: automated structural design, pp. 297–326. New York: Plenum Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Braibant, V. 1986: Structural optimization: a new dual method using mixed variables.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 23, 409–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleury, C.; Schmit, L.A. 1980: Dual methods and approximation concepts in structural synthesis.NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR 3226

  • Kuritz, S.P.; Fleury, C. 1989: Mixed variable structural optimization using convex linearization techniques.Eng. Opt. (to appear)

  • Lasdon, L.S. 1970:Optimization theory for large systems. New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Liefooghe, D.; Shyy, Y.K.; Fleury, C. 1989: Shape sensitivity analysis using low and high order elements.Eng. with Computers 4, 213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Lootsma, F.A. 1989: A comparative study of primal and dual approaches for solving separable and partially separable nonlinear optimization problems.Struct. Opt. 1, 73–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, A.J. 1982:Foundations of structural optimization: a unified approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra, G.K.; Fleury, C. 1989: Sensitivity and optimization of large scale composite structures.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design (to appear)

  • Nguyen, V.H.; Fleury, C.; Strodiot, J.J. 1987: A mathematical convergence analysis of the convex linearization method for engineering design optimization.Eng. Opt. 11, 195–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhoff, N. 1988: Optimal structural design via bound formulation and mathematical programming.Proc. GAMM Seminar Discretization Methods and Structural Optimization (held in Siegen, FRG). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmit, L.A.; Miura, H. 1976: Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis.NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR 2552

  • Schmit, L.A.; Fleury, C. 1980: Structural synthesis by combining approximation concepts and dual methods.AIAA J. 18, 1252–1260

    Google Scholar 

  • Starnes, J.H.; Haftka, R.T. 1979: Preliminary design of composite wings for buckling, stress and displacement constraints.J. Aircraft 16, 564–570

    Google Scholar 

  • Svanberg, K. 1987: Method of moving asymptotes — a new method for structural optimization.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 24, 359–373

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fleury, C. CONLIN: An efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts. Structural Optimization 1, 81–89 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637664

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637664

Keywords

Navigation