Abstract
The Convex Linearization method (CONLIN) exhibits many interesting features and it is applicable to a broad class of structural optimization problems. The method employs mixed design variables (either direct or reciprocal) in order to get first order, conservative approximations to the objective function and to the constraints. The primary optimization problem is therefore replaced with a sequence of explicit approximate problems having a simple algebraic structure. The explicit subproblems are convex and separable, and they can be solved efficiently by using a dual method approach.
In this paper, a special purpose dual optimizer is proposed to solve the explicit subproblem generated by the CONLIN strategy. The maximum of the dual function is sought in a sequence of dual subspaces of variable dimensionality. The primary dual problem is itself replaced with a sequence of approximate quadratic subproblems with non-negativity constraints on the dual variables. Because each quadratic subproblem is restricted to the current subspace of non zero dual variables, its dimensionality is usually reasonably small. Clearly, the Hessian matrix does not need to be inverted (it can in fact be singular), and no line search process is necessary.
An important advantage of the proposed maximization method lies in the fact that most of the computational effort in the iterative process is performed with reduced sets of primal variables and dual variables. Furthermore, an appropriate active set strategy has been devised, that yields a highly reliable dual optimizer.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Braibant, V.; Fleury, C. 1985: An approximation concepts approach to shape optimal design.Comp. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 53, 119–148
Braibant, V.; Geradin, M. 1985: Optimum path planning of robot arms.LTAS Report RA-2, University of Liége, Belgium
Fleury, C. 1979: Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 14, 1761–1783
Fleury, C. 1982: Reconciliation of mathematical programming and optimality criteria approaches to structural optimization. In: Morris, A.J. (ed.)Foundations of structural optimization: a unified approach pp. 363–404. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
Fleury, C. 1987: Computer aided optimal design of elastic structures. In: Mota Soares, C.A. (ed.)Computer aided optimal design: structural and mechanical systems, pp. 832–900. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
Fleury, C. 1986: Shape optimal design by the convex linearization method. In: Bennett, J.; Botkin, M. (eds.)The optimum shape: automated structural design, pp. 297–326. New York: Plenum Press
Fleury, C.; Braibant, V. 1986: Structural optimization: a new dual method using mixed variables.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 23, 409–428
Fleury, C.; Schmit, L.A. 1980: Dual methods and approximation concepts in structural synthesis.NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR 3226
Kuritz, S.P.; Fleury, C. 1989: Mixed variable structural optimization using convex linearization techniques.Eng. Opt. (to appear)
Lasdon, L.S. 1970:Optimization theory for large systems. New York: Macmillan
Liefooghe, D.; Shyy, Y.K.; Fleury, C. 1989: Shape sensitivity analysis using low and high order elements.Eng. with Computers 4, 213–228
Lootsma, F.A. 1989: A comparative study of primal and dual approaches for solving separable and partially separable nonlinear optimization problems.Struct. Opt. 1, 73–79
Morris, A.J. 1982:Foundations of structural optimization: a unified approach. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons
Nagendra, G.K.; Fleury, C. 1989: Sensitivity and optimization of large scale composite structures.Finite Elements in Analysis and Design (to appear)
Nguyen, V.H.; Fleury, C.; Strodiot, J.J. 1987: A mathematical convergence analysis of the convex linearization method for engineering design optimization.Eng. Opt. 11, 195–216
Olhoff, N. 1988: Optimal structural design via bound formulation and mathematical programming.Proc. GAMM Seminar Discretization Methods and Structural Optimization (held in Siegen, FRG). Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer
Schmit, L.A.; Miura, H. 1976: Approximation concepts for efficient structural synthesis.NASA Contractor Report NASA-CR 2552
Schmit, L.A.; Fleury, C. 1980: Structural synthesis by combining approximation concepts and dual methods.AIAA J. 18, 1252–1260
Starnes, J.H.; Haftka, R.T. 1979: Preliminary design of composite wings for buckling, stress and displacement constraints.J. Aircraft 16, 564–570
Svanberg, K. 1987: Method of moving asymptotes — a new method for structural optimization.Int. J. Num. Meth. Eng. 24, 359–373
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fleury, C. CONLIN: An efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts. Structural Optimization 1, 81–89 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637664
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01637664