Abstract
Linguistic styles of men and women in the area of sexual language were explored.. Two hundred forty-eight students were requested to list as many synonyms as possible for “sexual intercourse.” On the average, males listed a larger number of sexual intercourse synonyms than did females (nine vs. six). Similarly, males listed over 160 different words, whereas females listed over 130. In both instances, the vocabularies were rich, descriptive, and extensive. Males preferred the word “fuck”; females preferred the word “screw.” Males vis-à-vis females were more prone to approve the use of “fuck” and “screw” in same-sex or mixed-sex company. Females had a penchant for using the phrase “make love,” which may be related to the strong emphasis that females place on love in the context of sexual intimacy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barry, H., Bacon, M., and Child, I. (1957). A cross-cultural survey of some sex differences in socialization.J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 55: 327–332.
Ehrmann, W. (1959).Premarital Dating Behavior Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Jenkins, J. L. (1969). The acquisition of language. In Goslin, D. A. (ed.),Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research Rand McNally, Chicago, pp. 661–686.
Kuhn, M. H., and McPartland, T. (1954). An empirical investigation of self-attitudes.Am. Sociol. Rev. 19: 68–76.
Maccoby, E. (1966).The Development of Sex Differences Stanford University Press, Stanford, Calif.
Parsons, T., and Bales, R. (1955).Family, Socialization, and Interaction Process Free Press, New York.
Reiss, I. L. (1967).The Social Contest of Premarital Sexual Permissiveness Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York.
Spitzer, S., C., and Stratton, J. (1971).The Assessment of the Self Sernoll, Iowa City, Ia.
Walsh, R. H. (1972). The generation gap in sexual beliefs.Sex. Behav. 2: 4–11.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Walsh, R.H., Leonard, W.M. Usage of terms for sexual intercourse by men and women. Arch Sex Behav 3, 373–376 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01636443
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01636443