Skip to main content
Log in

Spermatogenesis in the earthwormMicrochaetus pentheri (Oligochaeta, Microchaetidae)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Spermatogenesis inMicrochaetus pentheri (Microchaetidae) follows the familiar pattern known for other oligochaetes. Spermatogenic stages develop around an anucleate cytophore from which they separate as mature spermatozoa. During spermiogenesis the nucleus elongates and becomes surmounted by a complex, elongate acrosome; the flagellar axoneme develops from the distal centriole. The centriole is positioned posterior to the mid-piece, which consists of six mitochondria radially adpressed to form a cylinder about 2 μm long.Microchaetus shows many plesiomorphic features in the structure of its acrosome, which are also seen in two other taxa of the Diplotesticulata,Haplotaxis (Haplotaxidae) andSparganophilus (Sparganophilidae, Aquamegadrili), each of which has the greatest number of plesiomorphies in spermatozoal characters in its group. The Aquamegadrili constitute the sister-group of the Terrimegadrili which contain the earthworm families including the Microchaetidae. The numerous symplesiomorphies in spermatozoal characters do not, however, establish monophyly of microchaetids with haplotaxids and sparganophilids. An apomorphy in the acrosome ofMicrochaetus is its greater length (3.8 μm vs less than 1 μm inHaplotaxis and 1.5 μm inSparganophilus), in this respect resembling other investigated terrimegadriles, the lumbricids, hormogastrids and megascolecids. The axial rod of the acrosome ofMicrochaetus appears apomorphic relative to that ofHaplotaxis, Sparganophilus, lumbricids and megascolecids in lacking an anterior expansion, the capitulum. It ends posteriorly in a cylindrical body, somewhat resembling the node diagnostic of the axial rod of megascolecid earthworms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson WA, Weissman A, Ellis RA (1967) Cytodifferentiation during spermiogenesis inLumbricus terrestris. J Cell Biol 32:11–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraguti M (1983) Annelida — Clitellata. In: Adiyodi KG, Adiyodi RG (eds) Reproductive Biology of Invertebrates, vol II:Spermatogenesis and Sperm Function. Wiley, Chichester, pp 343–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraguti M (1984) Cytological aspects of oligochaete spermiogenesis. Hydrobiologia 115:59–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraguti M, Jamieson BGM (1984) Spermiogenesis and spermatozoal ultrastructure inHormogaster (Hormogastridae, Oligochaeta, Annelida). J Submicrosc Cytol 16:307–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraguti M, Lanzavecchia G (1971) Morphogenetic effects of microtubules. I — Spermiogenesis in Annelida Tubificidae. J Submicrosc Cytol 3:121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (1971) The aquatic Oligochaeta of the world. Brinkhurst RO, Jamieson BGM (eds) Oliver and Boyd, Edinburgh, Toronto, 860 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (1978) Phylogenetic and phenetic systematics of the opisthoporous Oligochaeta (Annelida: Clitellata). Evol Theory 3:195–233

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (1981) Ultrastructure of the Oligochaeta. Academic Press, London, 462 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (1987) A biological classification of sperm types, with special reference to annelids and molluscs, and an example of spermiocladistics. In: Mohri H (ed) New Horizons in Sperm Cell Research, Japan Science Society Press, Tokyo/Gordon and Breach Science Publishers, New York, pp 311–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (1988) On the phylogeny and higher classification of the Oligochaeta. Cladistics 4:367–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM (1991) Fish evolution and systematics: Evidence from Spermatozoa. Cambridge University Press, 320 pp

  • Jamieson BJM, Daddow L (1979) An ultrastructural study of microtubules and the acrosome in Spermiogenesis of Tubificidae (Oligochaeta). J Ultrastruct Res 67:209–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamieson BGM, Erseus C, Ferraguti M (1987) Parsimony analysis of the phylogeny of some Oligochaeta (Annelida) using spermatozoal ultrastructure. Cladistics 3:145–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinucci GB, Felluga B, Carli S (1977) Development and degeneration of cytophorus during spermiohistogenesis inEisenia foetida (Sav.). Boll Zool 44:383–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickford GE (1975) Contributions to a study of South African Microchaetiniae (Annelida:Oligochaeta). Trans Connecticut Acad 46:13–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger JF (1967) A study on the fine structure of developing spermatozoa from the oligochaete,Enchytraeus albidus. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 82:257–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Simms RW (1978) Megadrilacea (Oligochaeta). In: Weger MJA (ed) Biogeography and ecology of southern Africa, vol II, Dr. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 661–676

    Google Scholar 

  • Troyer D, Cameron ML (1980) Spermiogenesis in lumbricid earthworms revisited. I — Function and fate of centrioles, fusion of organelles and organelle movements. Biol Cell 37:273–286

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hodgson, A.N., Jamieson, B.G.M. Spermatogenesis in the earthwormMicrochaetus pentheri (Oligochaeta, Microchaetidae). Zoomorphology 112, 57–66 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01632995

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01632995

Keywords

Navigation